Skip to content

KTP Laser vs Pulsed Dye Laser for Port-Wine Stains

Potassium Tetanyl Phosphate Laser vs Pulsed Dye Laser for Treating Port-Wine Stains - A Prospective, Split-Side Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05771311
Enrollment
30
Registered
2023-03-16
Start date
2023-02-01
Completion date
2023-08-01
Last updated
2023-03-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Port-Wine Stain

Brief summary

To compare the efficacy and safety of 532nm KTP laser and 585 nm pulsed dye laser for treating port-wine stains.

Detailed description

Nevus flammeus is a vascular, primarily capillary malformation visible from birth on. In rare cases, it may also affect venous and/or arterial vascular systems of the skin or other organs \[1\]. It occurs in 0.3%-0.5% of the population \[1\], i.e. in about 3-4 out of 1000 newborns, and is thus the most frequent vascular malformation in children. The cause is a permanent dilatation of the capillary vessels, which is caused by a lack of sympathetic nerve fibers or a lower density of the same. First-line therapy of port-wine stains consists of laser treatment with the long-pulsed dye laser \[2\] with a wavelength of 595nm. Treatment must be performed at least 10 times at intervals of about 8 weeks and leads to lightening and reduction of lesions. In recent years, problems have often arisen in care of port-wine stain patients because dye lasers often failed due to the instability of technology, resulting in treatment delays. Novel long-pulsed KTP lasers may be a sufficient alternative to pulsed dye lasers in treatment of port-wine stains.

Interventions

DEVICEKTP

split-side, 1 -5 sessions at intervals of 6 - 8 weeks

DEVICEPDL

split-side, 1 -5 sessions at intervals of 6 - 8 weeks

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Men and women 18 years and older * Good general health, no relevant previous diseases * Presence of one or more port-wine stains * Cognitive ability and willingness to give consent (Informed Consent)

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18 years * Pregnant and breastfeeding women * Significant open wounds or lesions in the region to be treated * Missing consent and/or data protection declarations

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Erythemaat follow-up visit 6 weeks after last treatment sessionassessment scale 1 - 7 (normal skin - dark purple) evaluated by physician and blinded investigator
area reductionat follow-up visit 6 weeks after last treatment sessionmeasurement using photo documentation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
patient satisfactionat follow-up visit 6 weeks after last treatment sessionassessment scale 1 - 6 (very - not at all) evaluated by subjects

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactL Nguyen, MD
l.nguyen@uke.de+49 (0)40 7410-0

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026