Skip to content

Feasibility Study of the Pulsed Electric Field Ablation System in Treating Chronic Bronchitis

Feasibility and Safety Evaluation of the Pulsed Electric Field Ablation System on Patients With Chronic Bronchitis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05771129
Enrollment
15
Registered
2023-03-16
Start date
2023-03-10
Completion date
2025-03-10
Last updated
2023-03-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Bronchitis

Keywords

Chronic Bronchitis, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Pulsed Electric Field Ablation, Safety Evaluation, Feasibility Study

Brief summary

To preliminarily evaluate the safety and feasibility of the pulsed electric field ablation system independently developed by Zhouling (Shanghai) Medical Appliance Co., Ltd. in the treatment of chronic bronchitis.

Detailed description

Pulsed electric field ablation instrument is a therapeutic instrument based on the irreversible electroporation (IRE) mechanism. The high frequency short duration energy is delivered via a disposable pulse ablation catheter through the bronchoscope and act on the bronchial mucosa, through which goblet cell hyperplasia and airway mucus secretion will be alleviated. The entire treatment consists of two procedure sessions that will be performed one month apart. The first treatment procedure consists of a baseline biopsy of the airway mucosa followed by the treatment of the right lung. The second procedure (one month after right-sided lung treatment) consists of a biopsy of the treated airway, followed by the treatment of the left lung. All procedures will be performed under general anaesthesia. Treatment is considered complete once the two bronchoscopic ablation procedures are successfully completed. A third bronchoscopy will be performed three months following the first treatment where mucosa-biopsy will be taken from the previously treated airway sites to evaluate the histopathological evidence of change in mucus producing cells within the airway after treatment. Subjects will be required to fill questionnaire (SGRQ and CAT ) and complete several examinations (including chest CT scans, respiratory function tests, etc.) during follow-up.

Interventions

DEVICEPulse electric field ablation system developed by Zhouling (Shanghai) Medical Appliance Co., Ltd.

Pulsed electric field ablation instrument is a therapeutic instrument based on the irreversible electroporation (IRE) mechanism. The high frequency short duration energy is delivered via a disposable pulse ablation catheter through the bronchoscope and act on the bronchial mucosa, through which goblet cell hyperplasia and airway mucus secretion will be alleviated. The entire treatment consists of two procedure sessions that will be performed one month apart. The first treatment procedure consists of a baseline biopsy of the airway mucosa followed by the treatment of the right lung. The second procedure consists of a biopsy of the treated airway, followed by the left-side treatment. A third bronchoscopy will be performed three months following the first treatment and mucosa-biopsy will be conducted to evaluate the histopathological change in mucus producing cells after treatment. Subjects will also be required to fill questionnaire and complete several examinations during follow-up.

Sponsors

Zhouling (Shanghai) Medical Appliance Co., Ltd.
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Jiayuan Sun
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject's age is ≥35 years and ≤80 years; 2. Subject has chronic bronchitis, defined as productive cough for at least three months in each of two successive years, whereas other causes of productive cough have been ruled out. 3. Subject has a CAT score ≥ 10. 4. Subject has a SGRQ score ≥ 25. 5. Subject's responses to the first two questions of the CAT questionnaire sum to ≥ 7 points or the sum is 6 points and the subject's total CAT score is \> 20 points. 6. Subject has post -bronchodilator FEV1/FVC \< 0.7. 7. Subject has post-bronchodilator FEV1 percent predicted of ≥ 30%. 8. Subject is receiving guideline directed pharmacotherapy which includes one or more long-acting bronchodilator (LAMA, LABA) with or without an inhaled corticosteroid for at least 8 weeks prior to randomization, unless the patient has attempted such therapy within the past 1 year without significant clinical response or had an adverse reaction. 9. Subject has a cigarette smoking history of at least ten pack years, and has had quit smoking for at least 6 months before enrollment (cigarettes, e-cigarettes, etc.), and agreed to remain non-smoking during the study; 10. In the opinion of the investigator, subject is able to undergo 3 bronchoscopies under general anesthesia (including mucosal biopsy), is willing to participate in the study, and is able to follow the study follow-up plan.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subject has known unresolved lower respiratory tract infection (e.g., pneumonia, mycobacterium avium-intracellulare infection (MAI), fungus, tuberculosis, etc). 2. Subject has a steroid-dependent condition requiring \>10 mg of oral corticosteroid per day. 3. Subject has any implantable electronic device (e.g., pacemaker, cardioverter defibrillator) that cannot be turned off during the procedure. 4. Subject has a history of ventricular tachy-arrhythmia or clinically significant atrial tachyarrhythmia within the past two years, unless the arrhythmia has been treated and/or patient is in regular rhythm during the screening phase. 5. Subject has unresolved lung cancer. 6. Subject has a pulmonary nodule or cavity that in the judgement of the investigator may require intervention during the course of the study. 7. Subject had prior lung surgery, such as lung transplant, LVRS, lobectomy, lung implant/prosthesis, metal airway stent, valves, coils or bullectomy, etc. Previous sub-lobectomy, previous history of pneumothorax but no pneumonectomy, previous pleural disease but no surgical intervention are not the

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To evaluate the rate of adverse events and severe adverse events associated with pulsed electric field ablation systemsWithin 30 days after either the first or second study procedure1. Index Name: Incidence of surgical or device-related adverse events during and within 1 month of bilateral lung ablation Observation purpose: To evaluate the safety of pulsed electric field ablation. Definition of index: To evaluate the adverse events according to CTCAE v5.0 and evaluate its correlation with the device itself or the operation and calculate the incidence rate of serious adverse events related to the device and the operation treatment. 2. Index Name: The incidence of surgery-or device-related serious adverse events. Observation purpose: To evaluate the safety of pulsed electric field ablation. Definition of index: To evaluate the serious adverse events according to CTCAE v5.0 and evaluate its correlation with the device itself or the operation and calculate the incidence rate of serious adverse events related to the device and the operation treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvements in COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score6 and 12 months after bilateral treatmentTo evaluate changes from baseline in the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score at 6 and 12 months after bilateral surgery.
Clinical Efficacy - Pulmonary Function6 and 12 months after bilateral treatmentTo evaluate changes from baseline in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) in pulmonary function tests (PFT) at 6 and 12 months after bilateral surgery.
Pathological examination-goblet cell proliferation score3 months after treatment on the right sideBaseline, 1 month and 3 months after surgery, the mucosa of the right airway should be biopsied, and obtained tissue should be stained with HE and PAS, in which the proliferation of goblet cells should be compared and scored (semi-quantitative , goblet cells: ciliated cells: 0 point, normal, 1: 10; 1 point, mild hyperplasia, 1: 3-10; 2 points, moderate hyperplasia, 1: 1; 3 points, severe hyperplasia, \> 1: 1)
Improvements in COPD Version of the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-C)6 and 12 months after bilateral treatmentTo evaluate the changes from baseline in the total score of the COPD Version of the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-C) at 6 and 12 months after bilateral surgery.
Distal Airway Volume6 and 12 months after bilateral treatmentTo evaluate changes from baseline in distal Airway Volume (based on expiratory phase HRCT imaging analysis) at 6 and 12 months after bilateral surgery.
Incidence of device defectsAfter bilateral treatment, assessed up to 2 monthsIt refers to the unreasonable risks that may endanger human health and life safety in the normal use of medical devices during the clinical trials, such as labeling errors, quality problems, failures, etc.
Acute exacerbation12 months after bilateral treatmentTo evaluate the times of moderate and severe acute exacerbation and the length of hospitalization within 12 months after bilateral operation. Acute exacerbation is defined as the simultaneous occurrence of two or more exacerbations or new episodes of respiratory symptoms, such as short of breath, cough, expectoration, dyspnea or chest tightness, and at least one respiratory symptom lasts for three days or more, resulting in the need for short-acting bronchodilators, or the use of antibiotics and/or oral glucocorticoids (moderate acute exacerbation), or the need for hospitalization or emergency treatment (severe acute exacerbation)

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactJiayuan Sun, MD., PhD.
jysun1976@163.com86-021-22200000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026