Skip to content

Digital Versus Conventional Impression Technique in Mandibular Arch

Accuracy of Impression Techniques and Their Effect on the Passive Fit of Screw- Retained Bar Splinting Two Interforaminal Implants

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05770011
Enrollment
54
Registered
2023-03-15
Start date
2023-02-01
Completion date
2024-05-01
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Edentulous Jaw

Brief summary

Objectives: Passive fit of screw retained frameworks is essential to avoid biological and mechanical failures in addition to transmission of unfavourable stresses to the bone-implant interface. However, Several factors contribute to the passive fit of screw retained prosthesis such as relative parallelism between the implants, implant number, impression material, impression technique and method of prothesis fabrication. The current study aims to evaluate the accuracy of three different impression techniques on the fit of screw retained bar splinting two inter-foraminal implants. Methods: The study presents evaluation of the passive fit of screw retained bar fabricated with three different impression techniques.

Detailed description

Surgical guide will be designed for completely edentulous patients. It will be inserted into the patient's mouth, stabilized against the upper denture and secured in place. dental implants will then be placed. For bar fabrication using the first impression technique, closed-top primary impressions will be made followed by open top secondary impression. Extraoral scanning of the impression will be done followed by digital fabrication of the bar. For bar fabrication using the second impression technique, scanning of the lower arch will be done using Omnicam intraoral scanner. Scanning will be done by a single calibrated operator who is trained on intraoral scanning techniques. Scan bodies will be then screwed to the implants and scanning will be done. Both scans will be previewed on the computer desktop and superimposed together. A Standard tessellation language file will be then exported, downloaded and previewed in Inlab Exocad software .Implant system and the bar design will be selected from the software library. Then, the Standard tessellation Language file will be exported to the milling machine and milling of Cobalt chromium bar will be done. For bar fabrication using the third technique, splinting of scan bodies will be done followed by intraoral scanning of the lower arch.

Interventions

DEVICEintraoral scanner of nonsplinted scan bodies

scanning of non splinted scan bodies

DEVICEimpression material

conventional recording

DEVICEintraoral scanner of splinted scan bodies

scanning of splinted scan bodies

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

triple blinded

Intervention model description

one control group and two comparator groups

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* \- Patients' age range from 50 to 65 years old. * Good oral hygiene is mandatory. * Sufficient restorative space (15mm) to accept implant supported over denture diagnosed by mounting the diagnostic casts. * Firm and healthy mucosa covering the alveolar ridge. * Minimum bone width 5.5 mm buccolingually and of 12 mm bone height as diagnosed from the pre-operative cone beam computed tomography scan.

Exclusion criteria

* Heavy smokers. * Patients with para functional habits. * Tempromandibular Joint Disorders. (TMJ disorders) * Patients with systemic disorders that may affect the results of this study. * V-shaped dental arch.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
linear accuracy of impressions by superimposition1 yearaccurate details recorded by superimposition of the impressions using geomagic software program by measuring linear deviation in millimeters
Angular accuracy of impressions by superimposition1 yearaccurate details recorded by superimposition of the impressions using geomagic software program by measuring angular displacements in degrees
passive fit of screw retained barsone yearframe work fitting passively using screw resistance test using screw resistance parameter calculated by subtraction of passive and non passive situations angles of rotation in degrees

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026