Skip to content

Comparison of Different Manual Therapy Approaches in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain

Comparison of Different Manual Therapy Approaches in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05769179
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-03-15
Start date
2023-03-30
Completion date
2024-03-30
Last updated
2023-03-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain

Brief summary

The aim of the study was to compare the effects of different manual therapy approaches on pain, cervical range of motion, balance, functional status and life quality in patients with chronic neck pain.

Detailed description

Various physiotherapy and rehabilitation methods are applied in the treatment of patients with chronic neck pain. Clinical practice guidelines for individuals with chronic neck pain recommend both manual therapy and exercise therapy among conservative treatments. Manual therapy are methods that can be safely applied to soft tissues and joints. Both manual therapy and exercise applications have been shown to have positive effects on neck pain and function. Some studies in the literature have also shown that manual therapy methods have positive effects on balance. However, no study examining the effects of different manual therapy (classical massage, connective tissue massage, manual joint techniques) approaches applied to individuals with chronic neck pain on pain, cervical range of motion, balance, functional status and quality of life was found in the literature.

Interventions

Massage group will be applied classic massage and cervical stabilisation exercises 3 days a week for 4 weeks

OTHERConnective tissue massage group

Connective tissue massage group will be applied connective tissue massage and cervical stabilisation exercises 3 days a week for 4 weeks

Mobilization group will be applied cervical mobilization techniques and cervical stabilisation exercises 3 days a week for 4 weeks

Sponsors

Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* To be between the ages of 18-65. * To participate in the study voluntarily. * Having a complaint of neck pain for at least 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

* To have undergone cervical spine surgery * Having cervical fracture and/or joint subluxation/dislocation * Severe degenerative arthritis * Having a neurological disease (Parkinson's disease, poliomyelitis, etc.) or an -inflammatory rheumatic disease (ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, etc.) * Presence of malignancy * Having cord compression and signs * Severe radiculopathy or myelopathy * Positive vertebrobasilar artery test, * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Intensitychange from baseline at 4 weeksPain intensity will be assessed with the Visual Analogue Scale (a 100 mm long horizontal line). Patient will be asked to score the pain he/she feels out of 10. The beginning of the figure is 0 no pain, ending in 10 there is unbearable pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pressure Pain Thresholdchange from baseline at 4 weeksPressure Pain Threshold will be assessed with a digital algometer device. The device that objectively measures the pain threshold will be used for the evaluation. The probe of the device will be pressed on the trapezius muscle. The first pain threshold felt will be recorded.
Cervical Range of Motionchange from baseline at 4 weeksCervical range of motion will be evaluated with a goniometer in the sitting position. Neck flexion, extension, right-left lateral flexion and right-left rotation ranges of motion will be recorded
Balancechange from baseline at 4 weeksBalance will be evaluated with the Biodex Balance System Device. The individual is placed on a platform of the device that evaluates the ability to keep the centre of gravity on the support surface. Changes in the centre of gravity of the individual standing on this platform will be recorded with this device in static and dynamic, with eyes open and closed.
Functional Statuschange from baseline at 4 weeksFunctional Status will be assessed with Neck Disability Index. This index consists of 10 items. Each item was scored from 0 (no disability) to 5 (complete disability). The total score ranged from 0 (no disability) to 50 (total disability). As the score increased, disability increased and as the score decreased, disability decreased.
Life qualitychange from baseline at 4 weeksLife quality will be assessed with Short Form-36 questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 36 items. Scoring is done over 100 points and the scores are between 0 and 100 points for each sub-parameter. 0 is calculated as the worst value and 100 as the best value.

Contacts

Primary ContactSeyda Toprak Celenay
sydtoprak@hotmail.com+90312 906 1000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026