Skip to content

Counterfactual Thinking and Decision-making in OSA Syndrome

Counterfactual Thinking About Clinical Decision and Decision-making in the Context of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05768633
Acronym
CT_OSAS
Enrollment
70
Registered
2023-03-14
Start date
2022-03-02
Completion date
2024-03-01
Last updated
2025-08-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Keywords

counterfactual thinking, decision-making, neuropsychological assessment, clinical setting

Brief summary

The aim of this research is to verify the ability of counterfactual thinking about medical decisions in individuals with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome when compared with healthy individuals

Interventions

All participants will be asked to complete the Counterfactual Inference Test - CIT (McNamara et al., 2003), a neuropsychological test that measures the ability to produce counterfactual-derived inferences. Moreover, the decision-making ability will be specifically tested through ad-hoc questionnaire (i.e., the Decision-Making Questionnaire). Finally, all participants will be screened with an extensive neuropsychological assessment, particularly on executive functioning.

Sponsors

Istituto Auxologico Italiano
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

\- Diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, according to the clinical assessment.

Exclusion criteria

\- Concurrent neurological, neurodevelopmental (e.g., autism), motor, and/or psychiatric disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CIT scoreBaselineScore at the Counterfactual inference test (CIT). The questionnaire is a four question forced choice test based on past research regarding factors that enhance counterfactual thinking. For each of the four questions, events experienced by two individuals are presented, and three response options are given. Only one option is the valid: the score is 1. For the not valid options, the score will be 0. Overall, the score range for the questionnaire is from 0 (worse performance) to 4 (best performance).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Decision-making indexBaselineScore at the Decision-Making Questionnaire. The self-report questionnaire assesses the decision making ability according to 7 questions, with a 5-item Likert's scale. The overall score (i.e., the sum of the scores at all questions) can range from 7 (worse decision making strategy) to 35 (best decision making strategy).

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026