Stress Incontinence, Female
Conditions
Brief summary
Urinary incontinence is a very common problem in women and can be seen at any age. Laparoscopic burch operation has been shown to be an effective, convenient and safe method in women with stress incontinence. Laparoscopic Burch operation is less invasive because it is advantageous in terms of hospitalization time, blood loss, pain and recovery time, but the disadvantage is the procedure time. Modified extraperitoneal technique may be a good method for lowering the procedure time.
Detailed description
In the research; The pre- and postoperative urodynamics of patients who underwent laparoscopic extraperitoneal (modified) burch operation in the Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic of Istanbul Health Sciences University Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital will be compared. Surgical outcomes together with complications will also be assessed. In addition, the QUALITY OF LIFE (SF36), which determines the quality of life of the patients related to the urinary system functions, and the UROGENITAL DISTRESS INVENTORY (UDI - 6), INCONTINENCE IMPACT QUESTIONNAIRE (IIQ-7) questionnaires that determine the effects of urinary incontinence, will be assessed preoperatively and postoperative 6 months of the patients.
Interventions
Units of a scale of the patients will be compared pre and postoperatively by using SF36
Units of a scale of the patients will be compared pre and postoperatively by using IIQ-7
Units of a scale of the patients will be compared pre and postoperatively by using UDI - 6
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Normally patients with stress urinary incontinence undergoes laparoscopic burch operation if transvaginal sling surgery was not planned. Here in our study group the assigned surgery type applied to study group is extraperitoneal ( modified) burch operation which is performed by not interfering with the abdominal cavity. By the way our study is an interventional study and it is planned to discuss both the anatomic and functional results of this technique.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* having stress urinary incontinence
Exclusion criteria
* having any kind of urogynecological surgery history * having pelvic mass * having endometrial or myometrial pathology * having uterine prolapsus grater than grade 2 * benign obese
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Surgical outcomes | 1 year | Operation time in minutes |
| Preoperative and postoperative urodynamic result | 1 year | First sensation of fluid filled in bladder in milliliter will be compared. |
| Preoperative and postoperative Quality of life Questionnaire | 1 year | The domains assessed were pain, diet, speech, recreation, anxiety, mood, and overall QoL. Patients were asked to choose a Likert scale response (for example, 1 = no pain to 5 = severe pain) to a question on each domain and higher score represents better health. overall score ranges from 6 to 30. Pre and postoperative values will be compared. |
| Preoperative and postoperative UROGENITAL DISTRESS INVENTORY | 1 year | Score ranges from zero to 18 and higher scores indicate more severe symptoms and INCONTINENCE IMPACT QUESTIONNAIRE (IIQ-7) in which SCORES RANGES FROM 0 TO 21 AND a higher score indicates more severe symptoms and lower quality of life. Pre and postoperative values will be compared. |
| Preoperative and postoperative INCONTINENCE IMPACT QUESTIONNAIRE | 1 year | Scores ranges from 0 to 21 AND a higher score indicates more severe symptoms and lower quality of life. Pre and postoperative values will be compared. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)