Skip to content

Reduction of Myopotential Interference With Smart Pass in S-ICD Patients

The Efficacy of the Smart Pass Filter to Reduce the Risk for Inappropriate Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Shocks From Myopotential Interference

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05766943
Enrollment
71
Registered
2023-03-13
Start date
2023-11-06
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2026-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopotential Interference, Subcutaneous ICD

Keywords

Device interrogation

Brief summary

This study is enrolling participants who are already implanted with a S-ICD device ( subcutaneous ICD), and are undergoing a routine outpatient clinic follow up appointment to have their S-ICD checked. The aim of the study is to see if a feature in the device can recognize muscle movement and differentiate movement from irregular heart signals. The study involves doing some simple arm exercises while collecting device data, both with this feature turn on and then with it turned off. Participants will be randomized to either have the feature turned on or off initially then it will be programmed the alternative way and the same exercise testing will be repeated. The study will involve just one visit.

Detailed description

This study is enrolling participants who are already implanted with a S-ICD device ( subcutaneous ICD), and are undergoing a routine outpatient clinic follow up appointment to have their S-ICD checked. The aim of the study is to see if a feature in the device can recognize muscle movement and differentiate movement from irregular heart signals. The study involves doing some simple arm exercises while collecting device data, both with this feature turn on and then with it turned off. Participants will be randomized to either have the feature turned on or off initially, then it will be programmed the alternative way and the same exercise testing will be repeated. The study will involve just one visit. Following this visit study participation is complete.

Interventions

DEVICESmart Pass ON

Smart Pass filter will be programmed ON in the S-ICD while performing exercise testing.

DEVICESmart Pass OFF

Smart Pass filter will be programmed OFF in the S-ICD while performing exercise testing.

Sponsors

Boston Scientific Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Medical University of South Carolina
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* At least 18 years of age * Implanted EMBLEM S-ICD (Model A 209 and Model A 219, Boston Scientific, St Paul, MN, USA)

Exclusion criteria

* Less than 18 years of age * Hemodynamically unstable * Inability to preform TET due to orthopedic issues or cognitive impairment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The incidence of myopotential interferencethroughout the intervention, approximately 20 minutesThe incidence of myopotential interference, assessed by subcutaneous electrogram annotated T marker during the tube exercise test with or without Smart Pass filter

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of MPI in US participants and Japanese participantsduration of enrollment, approximately 6 monthsCompare the differences in the incidence of myopotential interference in US and Japanese participants

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactDebi Everidge
adamsde@musc.edu843-792-2944
Backup ContactKavin Panneerselvam
panneeer@musc.edu843-792-0464

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026