Complications, Emergency Surgery, Long-term Antiplatelet Treatment, Severe Spontaneous Intracranial Hemorrhage
Conditions
Brief summary
Background: Despite the capability of emergency surgery to reduce the mortality of severe spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (SSICH) patients, the effect and safety of surgical treatment for severe spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (SSICH) patients receiving long-term oral antiplatelet treatment (LOAPT) remains unclear. In consideration of this, the cohort study is aimed at figuring out the effect and safety of emergency surgery for SSICH patients on LOAPT. Methods: As a multicenter and prospective cohort study, it will be conducted across 7 representative clinical centers. Starting in September 2019, the observation is scheduled to be completed by December 2022, with a total of 450 SSIC H patients recruited. The information on clinical, radiological, and laboratory practices will be recorded objectively. All of the patients will be monitored until death or 6 months after the occurrence of primary hemorrhage. Results: In this study, two comparative cohorts and an observational cohort will be set up. The primary outcome is the effect of emergency surgery, which is subject to assessment using the total mortality and comparison in the survival rate of SSICH patients on LOAPT between surgical treatment and conservative treatment. The second outcome is the safety of surgery, with the postoperative hemorrhagic complication which is compared between the operated SSICH patients on and not on LOAPT. Based on the observation of the characteristics and outcome of SSICH patients on LOAPT, the ischemic events after discontinuing LOAPT will be further addressed, and the coagulation function assessment system for operated SSICH patients on LOAPT will be established. Conclusions: In this study, we will investigate the effect and safety of emergency surgery for SSICH patients on LOAPT, which will provide an evidence for management in the future.
Interventions
PROCEDUREEmergency neurosurgery
Surgical evacuation for intracerebral hemorrhage
PROCEDUREConservative treatment
Standard treatment for intracerebral hemorrhage
Sponsors
Beijing Chao Yang Hospital
Beijing Shuyi Hospital
Beijing Anzhen Hospital
Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital
Beijing Pinggu District Hospital
Beijing Tiantan Hospital
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* (1) 18-75 years old; * (2) non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage; * (3) severe intracerebral hemorrhage, which was defined as patients with supratentorial bleeding volume \> 30 ml, infratentorial bleeding volume \> 10 ml, midline shift \> 1 cm, or large intraventricular hematoma; * (4) Glasgow coma score (GCS) \< 13; * (5) family members agree to provide an informed written consent.
Exclusion criteria
* (1) patients had cerebrovascular diseases, e.g., intracranial aneurysm or vascular malformation, and intracranial tumors, which were associated with hemorrhage; * (2) hemorrhagic transformation of cerebral infarction; * (3) hemorrhage caused by venous thrombosis; * (4) patients with severe coagulation disorder, e.g., hemophilia; * (5) patients with coagulation dysfunction caused by malignant tumor, hepatic insufficiency, renal dysfunction, thrombocytopenia, coagulation diseases, and so on; * (6) patients receiving other anticoagulation medications (vitamin K antagonist and new oral anticoagulants); * (7) patients not on LOAPT who receive conservative treatment; * (8) the patients who died before or on arriving at the hospital and within a short period (6 h) after admission.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Total mortality | From admission to 6 months after the occurrence primary hemorrhage |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Postoperative intracranial bleeding | Within one week after surgery |
Countries
China
Outcome results
None listed