Hemiparesis, Stroke
Conditions
Keywords
Stroke, Hemiparesis, Rehabilitation, Motor Learning
Brief summary
The purpose of this research is to learn about practice conditions that may benefit stroke survivors when learning to use their more affected arm to perform a task. Participants will be randomized into two groups. Experimental and control groups will differ by one practice variable that will not be disclosed until completion of testing procedures. Participants will practice a motor task using both their more and less affected arms for two consecutive days. A Pre-Test will be administered on Day 1 before the training begins. Immediate Transfer of Learning will be administered on Day 2 after the completion of training. Delayed (24-hour) Retention and Transfer Tests will be administered on Day 3.
Detailed description
Stroke involves loss of blood flow to the brain and can cause impaired upper limb motor function, resulting in long term disability. Targeted motor learning interventions can improve skill acquisition and functional upper limb use after stroke. For example, repetitive practice of a motor task has been shown to improve motor learning outcomes. However, more research is currently needed to identify important active ingredients in complex motor learning interventions and determine the most effective approaches for improving upper limb recovery after stroke. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of a specific practice variable on motor learning for individuals with upper limb hemiparesis after stroke. This research will inform the development of future stroke rehabilitation interventions aimed at improving skill acquisition and motor learning.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALPractice Variable
This group receives the practice variable. The practice variable being studied will not be disclosed until completion of testing procedures.
BEHAVIORALNo Practice Variable
This group does not receive the practice variable. The practice variable being studied will not be disclosed until completion of testing procedures.
Sponsors
Columbia University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
Research participants will be blinded to the overall purpose of the study and will not be informed of the difference between the groups. They will be debriefed after the completion of all study procedures in accordance with IRB policies. Outcomes assessors will be blinded to group allocation.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* At least 6 months following stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) * Upper limb weakness resulting from the stroke * Able to follow 2-step commands * Box and Block test score of 3-60 * Intact proprioception at the index finger of the weaker arm * English speaking
Exclusion criteria
* Severe neglect (Score of 2 on extinction and inattention items of NIHSS) * Arm pain that limits movement or loss of functional range of movement (contracture) * Unable to give informed consent * Received Botox within the past 3-months
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 24-Hour Retention Test: Number of completed scoops (more affected arm) | Day 3 | This is a 24-hour Retention Test of the trained motor task (the Scooping Task) that the participant practiced for 2 days. The participant is asked to use a spoon to scoop beans from one cup to another in an anterior-posterior direction, away from their body, for 30 seconds. One completed scoop occurs when at least one bean is transferred to the second cup. The score is the number of completed scoops that occur within 30 seconds. The participant will complete two blocks of five trials (30 seconds each). The number of completed scoops will be averaged across blocks of trials. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate Transfer Test: Number of transported cubes (more affected arm) | Day 2 | This is an Immediate Transfer Test that will be administered on Day 2 following completion of training on the Scooping Task. The participant is asked to transport cubes in an anterior-posterior direction away from their body, using the Box and Block Test apparatus, for 30 seconds. The score is the number of cubes that are transported within 30 seconds. The participant will complete two blocks of five trials (30 seconds each). The number of transported cubes will be averaged across blocks of trials. |
| 24-Hour Transfer Test: Number of transported cubes (more affected arm) | Day 3 | This is a 24-Hour Transfer Test that will be administered on Day 3. The participant is asked to transport cubes in an anterior-posterior direction away from their body, using the Box and Block Test apparatus, for 30 seconds. The score is the number of cubes that are transported within 30 seconds. The participant will complete two blocks of five trials (30 seconds each). The number of transported cubes will be averaged across blocks of trials. |
| Self-Efficacy Rating for Scooping Task | Day 2 | After completing training on Day 2, the participant will be asked to rate their confidence in achieving various scores on the trained motor task (the Scooping Task). Self-Efficacy will be rated using a 10 point scale (0 = Not confident at all; 10 = Very confident) with higher scores indicating a better outcomes. Scores will be calculated by averaging Self-Efficacy ratings. |
| Rating of Mood | Day 2 | After completing training on Day 2, participants will be asked to rate their mood using the valence subscale of the Self-Assessment Manikin, which is a non-verbal assessment of affect that has five pictures of smiling, neutral, and frowning faces. The participant rates their mood using a 9 point scale based on the pictures (1 = More positive affect; 9 = Less positive affect) with lower scores indicating a better outcome. |
| Interest/Enjoyment Subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory | Day 2 | After completing training on Day 2, the participant will complete items from the interest/enjoyment subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory. This is an assessment of participant's subjective experience of the Scooping Task. Participants will rate each statement according to how true it is for them, using a 7 point scale (1 = Not true at all; 7 = Very true). Higher scores indicate greater interest/enjoyment when practicing the task (better outcome). Scores are calculated by averaging the item scores of the subscale. |
| Perceived Competence Subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory | Day 2 | After completing training on Day 2, the participant will complete items from the perceived competence subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory. This is an assessment of participant's subjective experience of the Scooping Task. Participants will rate each statement according to how true it is for them, using a 7 point scale (1 = Not true at all; 7 = Very true). Higher scores indicate greater perceived competence when practicing the task (better outcome). Scores are calculated by averaging the item scores of the subscale. |
| Perceived Choice Subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory | Day 2 | After completing training on Day 2, the participant will complete items from the perceived choice subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory. This is an assessment of participant's subjective experience of the Scooping Task. Participants will rate each statement according to how true it is for them, using a 7 point scale (1 = Not true at all; 7 = Very true). Higher scores indicate greater perceived choice when practicing the task (better outcome). Scores are calculated by averaging the item scores of the subscale. |
| Value Subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory | Day 2 | After completing training on Day 2, the participant will complete items from the value subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory. This is an assessment of participant's subjective experience of the Scooping Task. Participants will rate each statement according to how true it is for them, using a 7 point scale (1 = Not true at all; 7 = Very true). Higher scores indicate greater value associated with the task (better outcome). Scores are calculated by averaging the item scores of the subscale. |
| Effort Subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory | Day 2 | After completing training on Day 2, the participant will complete items from the effort subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory. This is an assessment of participant's subjective experience of the Scooping Task. Participants will rate each statement according to how true it is for them, using a 7 point scale (1 = Not true at all; 7 = Very true). Higher scores indicate greater effort associated with the task (better outcome). Scores are calculated by averaging the item scores of the subscale. |
| Pressure/Tension Subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory | Day 2 | After completing training on Day 2, the participant will complete items from the pressure/tension subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory. This is an assessment of participant's subjective experience of the Scooping Task. Participants will rate each statement according to how true it is for them, using a 7 point scale (1 = Not true at all; 7 = Very true). Higher scores indicate greater pressure/tension when practicing the task (worse outcome). Scores are calculated by averaging the item scores of the subscale. |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed