Cannabis Use Disorder
Conditions
Keywords
Randomized Controlled Trial, Cannabis Use Disorder, Adolescents, Young adults, Motivational Interviewing, Cognitive and Behavioral Therapy, Attachment-based Intervention
Brief summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate an Integrative Therapy for Adolescent Cannabis Use (TIMCA), integrating elements of Motivational Interviewing (MI), Cognitive Behavioral Therapies (CBT) and an Attachment-Based Intervention (ABI), (IBA),compared to Treatment As Usual (TAU) on cannabis use. The secondary objectives of the study are: To assess the effectiveness of the TIMCA, in comparison to the TAU, on: (1) Relationship quality with parents, (2) Relationship quality with closest friend, (3) Emotional regulation strategies, (4) Depressive symptomatology, (5) Anxiety symptomatology, (6) Adherence to therapy
Detailed description
Cannabis is the most used psychoactive substance in the world after tobacco and alcohol, particularly among adolescents and young adults. Cannabis use during adolescence can lead to cognitive, psychological, academic, and social consequences, causing significant distress. In 2019, French adolescents reported one of the highest levels of cannabis experimentation and use (past month) in Europe (5th and 2nd respectively) (Philippon & Spilka, 2020). Regular use of cannabis during adolescence can cause or reinforce psychological suffering in both the young person and those around him/her, and therefore constitutes a major public health issue. Although psychotherapeutic techniques form the basis of treatment for Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD), relapse is common at the follow-up assessment after therapy has ended (Gates et al., 2016; Walther et al., 2016). The literature shows the effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing (MI) on the one hand, and psychotherapies such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapies (CBT) and Multidimensional Family Therapy (MDFT) on the other. The most consistent and coherent evidence supports the combination of CBT and MI to decrease the frequency and severity of cannabis use. As the combination of MI and CBT has proven to be effective with young users, it seems important to add an Attachment-Based Intervention (ABI), as difficulties with interpersonal relationships and emotional regulation are risk factors for the development and maintenance of addiction in adolescents (Fairbairn et al., 2018; Rahioui, 2016). This randomized, single-blind, two-arm, parallel, multicenter trial postulates that participants in the TIMCA group will have better outcomes than those in the Treatment As Usual (TAU) group in terms of cannabis use, quality of relationship with others, emotional regulation strategies, as well as anxiety-depressive symptomatology (during therapy, at the end of therapy, and at four weeks after the end of therapy).
Interventions
OTHERTIMCA
TIMCA is an individual therapy that will include the parents at certain points in the therapy . It will consist of two sessions of MI, two sessions of CBT, five sessions of ABI and one final session of summary to conclude the therapy. Out of 10 sessions, there will be three with the parents and the adolescent together.
OTHERTreatment as Usual
TAU will consist of several approaches including analytical, cognitive-behavioral , intepersonal psychotherapy. Each therapist will be asked to specify the approach used as well as the therapeutic axes.
Sponsors
Centre Hospitalier St Anne
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Intervention model description
This will be a single-blinded, randomised, comparative therapeutic interventions, controlled trial. This is a prospective, randomized, single-blind, two-arm, parallel, multicenter study to evaluate the non-inferiority of an Integrative Therapy for Adolescent Cannabis Misuse (TIMCA) compared to the Treatment As Usual (TAU) control group using an Adaptive Group-Sequential non Inferiority Study Design. Two interim analyses are planned (when 30 and 60 subjects have completed the study). Both interventions will take place under similar conditions: 10 sessions, once a week, delivered by clinical psychologists who will be supervised.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 20 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Aged 14 to 19 years 11 months 29 (or 30) days at the time of the inclusion visit * Consulting as an outpatient center: * Fulfilling the criteria for Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD) according to DSM 5 criteria (mild, moderate or severe) * Fluent in oral and written French * Benefiting from a social security plan * Having signed their consent to participate (and their legal representative if applicable).
Exclusion criteria
* With an acute psychiatric disorder and/or a psychotropic treatment (a characterized depressive episode, a bipolar disorder, a psychotic disorder) * With a substance use disorder other than cannabis and tobacco, * Already engaged in another form of therapy * Pregnant women at the time of inclusion * Participants of age subject to a legal protection measure or unable to express their consent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Cannabis use | 4 weeks after the end of treatment | Cannabis use will be assessed via the TimeLine Follow Back (TLFB) (Robinson et al., 2014) and a urinanalysis (NarcoCheck) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Parent and peer attachment | 4 weeks after the end of treatment | Inventory of Parent and Peer attachment (IPPA) (Vignoli & Mallet, 2004) |
| Emotion regulation | 4 weeks after the end of treatment | The Regulation of Emotions Questionnaire (REQ2) (Sequeira, 2013) |
| Anxiety symptomatology | 4 weeks after the end of treatment | The Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (Spielberger et al., 1993) |
| Depressive symptomatology | 4 weeks after the end of treatment | Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (Byrne & Baron, 1994) |
Countries
France
Contacts
Primary ContactYara BOU NASSIF, psychologist
Outcome results
None listed