Skip to content

Optimizing Active Surveillance in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: a Pilot Study

Optimizing Active Surveillance in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: a Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05764005
Enrollment
39
Registered
2023-03-10
Start date
2022-11-09
Completion date
2024-03-11
Last updated
2026-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Keywords

low-risk, active surveillance

Brief summary

This is a pilot evaluation of a patient-centered intervention that enables providers to support men on active surveillance to maximize adherence. Conducted in urology practices, this pilot will measure key patient-reported, provider-reported, and implementation outcomes. Successful completion of this work will inform a subsequent multi-center effectiveness-implementation hybrid design trial and ultimately will improve low-risk cancer management by effectively engaging Primary Care Physicians (PCPs) in care delivery.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALweb-based tool (MAP- Management of Active surveillance in Prostate Cancer)

A web-based tool with modules on active surveillance education, team based active surveillance care delivery and the role of the PCP, and self-management for cancer anxiety and worry. {may need more detail}

BEHAVIORALMUSIC website

Standard of care educational materials {add more detail}

Sponsors

University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
55 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patient Inclusion Criteria: * 55 years old or older * Men diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer currently on active surveillance * Men who identify having a primary care provider * Access and ability to use the Internet Patient

Exclusion criteria

* Men who are unable to read and/or speak English * Men with impaired decision-making capacity (such as with a diagnosis of dementia or memory loss) PCP Inclusion Criteria: * Identified by patient on baseline survey as their PCP Urologist and Clinic Staff Inclusion Criteria: * Clinicians or staff at a participating urology clinic, including but not limited to MDs, APPs, and nurses

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility - Recruitmentup to 9 monthsDefined as the successful recruitment of 40 patients.
Feasibility - Uptakeup to 6 monthsDefined as the proportion of men who complete the baseline and follow-up surveys out of the total number of patients recruited.
Acceptability - Mean Satisfaction Scoresup to 4 monthsAcceptability asks the extent to which participants consider the intervention is agreeable. Patients in the intervention arm will answer questions (on a 5-point Likert scale) regarding the use of the tool including: a) the tool provided me the necessary information about being on active surveillance; b) the tool helped me know what tests I needed and when; c) the tool helped me understand what my PCP can do for my active surveillance; d) the tool was easy to use; e) the amount of time it took to go through the website; and f) I would recommend the tool to other patients. We will ask an open-ended question on if the tool should have any other features in future versions. We will additionally collect paradata such as user actions (clicks) and time spent on each webpage. Mean score will be provided from a scale of 1-5 for each question. 5 indicating greater acceptability. The name of the web-based tool being studied is MAP- Management of Active surveillance in Prostate Cancer.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORArchana Radhakrishnan

University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

4 patients did not complete the baseline survey and were not randomized

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Customized68.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
34 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
33 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
35 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 170 / 18
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 170 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 170 / 18

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 31, 2026