Skip to content

Comparing Relative Motion Splint and Metacarpophalangeal Joint Blocking Splint for Trigger Finger

A Randomized Comparative Trial of Relative Motion Splint Versus Metacarpophalangeal Joint Blocking Splint in the Management of Trigger Finger

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05763017
Enrollment
36
Registered
2023-03-10
Start date
2022-06-28
Completion date
2024-04-24
Last updated
2024-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stenosing Tenosynovitis, Trigger Finger

Keywords

relative motion splint, metacarpophalangeal joint blocking splint

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of relative motion splint and metacarpophalangeal joint blocking splints in terms of sign and symptoms, hand function, occupational performance, and perception of splint wearability (comfort and satisfaction) after six weeks of TF management.

Interventions

Six weeks relative motion splint wear.

OTHERMetacarpophalangeal Joint Blocking Splint

Six weeks metacarpophalangeal joint blocking splint wear.

Sponsors

National University of Malaysia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* single or multiple trigger finger * unilateral or bilateral trigger finger * neutral metacarpophalangeal joint position can be attained during passive isolated metacarpophalangeal joint extension of the affected finger

Exclusion criteria

* trigger thumb * steroid injection of the affected finger within last six months * A1 pulley release of the affected finger. * history of fracture, tendon injury, nerve injury, Dupuytren's contracture, and other soft tissue injuries of the affected finger or adjacent fingers.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stages of Stenosing Tenosynovitis (SST)Baseline, 6 weeks after splint wearSST is a grading system that divides trigger finger into six stages. Stage 1 is normal; Stage 2 is uneven finger movement; Stage 3 is triggering or clicking or catching; Stage 4 is locking of finger in flexion or extension, which can be unlocked by active finger movement; Stage 5 is locking of finger in flexion or extension, which requires application of passive force to unlock; and Stage 6 is locked finger in flexion or extension

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of triggering events in ten active fistsBaseline, 6 weeks after splint wearThe number of triggering events (0 - 10) can be obtained by asking the patient to make 10 active full fists.
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Outcome MeasureBaseline, 6 weeks after splint wearDASH is a 30-item, self-report questionnaire that range from 0-100 score, with higher scores represent more severe disability or poorer hand function.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for painBaseline, 6 weeks after splint wearThe left end of the VAS labelled as no pain and the right end labelled as extreme pain.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for splint comfortBaseline, 3 and 6 weeks after splint wearThe left end of the VAS labelled as not at all comfortable' and the right end labelled as extremely comfortable.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for splint satisfactionBaseline, 3 and 6 weeks after splint wearThe left end of the VAS labelled as not at all satisfied and the right end labelled as extremely satisfied.
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)Baseline, 6 weeks after splint wearCOPM is a interview-based assessment tool for measuring occupational performance. The importance, satisfaction, and performance of an activity are rated using a 10-point rating scale.

Countries

Malaysia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026