Not Determined
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to learn more about how well a questionnaire about food intake works. The study team will compare questionnaire responses to several other measurements of food intake. There is a special emphasis on fruit and vegetable intake.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Age 18-40 as we are aiming to recruit women of child-bearing age * Pregnant women up to 26 weeks' gestation * Women assigned female sex at birth who are not pregnant
Exclusion criteria
* Women below the age of 18 or over the age of 40 years * Pregnant women more than 26 weeks' gestation at the time of enrollment * Women who are experiencing limited or reduced food intake related to nausea will not be approached for recruitment and are considered ineligible * Women who are unwilling to participate in the study due to time commitment or other reasons * Women whose capacity for study compliance is diminished due to conditions such as active untreated substance use disorder, untreated/uncontrolled schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, active psychosis will not be approached for recruitment and are considered ineligible
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Concurrent validity of VioScreen against 24-hour recalls | 6 weeks | Concurrent validity measures how a new test compares against a validated test, called the criterion or gold standard. |
| Test-retest reliability of VioScreen | one month | Test-retest reliability is a measure of reliability obtained by administering the same test twice over a period of time to a group of individuals. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Test-retest reliability of Veggie Meter | one month | Test-retest reliability is a measure of reliability obtained by administering the same test twice over a period of time to a group of individuals. |
| Test-retest reliability of Fruit and Vegetable Screener | one month | Test-retest reliability is a measure of reliability obtained by administering the same test twice over a period of time to a group of individuals. |
| Concurrent validity of VioScreen against Veggie Meter | 6 weeks | Concurrent validity measures how a new test compares against a validated test, called the criterion or gold standard. |
| Concurrent validity of Fruit and Vegetable Screener against 24-hour recalls | 6 weeks | Concurrent validity measures how a new test compares against a validated test, called the criterion or gold standard. |
| Concurrent validity of Veggie Meter against 24-hour recalls | 6 weeks | Concurrent validity measures how a new test compares against a validated test, called the criterion or gold standard. |
| Concurrent validity of VioScreen against Fruit and Vegetable Screener | 6 weeks | Concurrent validity measures how a new test compares against a validated test, called the criterion or gold standard. |
Countries
United States