Skip to content

Rural Area Pharmacist Intervention for Diabetes

Rural Area Pharmacist Intervention for Diabetes - Management Using eHealth: A Pilot Study (RAPID-ME)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05761886
Enrollment
87
Registered
2023-03-09
Start date
2023-05-16
Completion date
2025-03-26
Last updated
2025-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes

Keywords

Telehealth, Rural populations, Clinical pharmacy services

Brief summary

The goal of the project is to inform the system leaders regarding the feasibility and utility of having an embedded telehealth-based clinical pharmacist at rural primary care practices for supportive disease management of patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and whether continuing and expanding the program within the system is worthwhile.

Detailed description

Improvement of suboptimal type 2 diabetes (T2D) management and outcomes in rural areas in the United States (US) is an urgent national health policy priority. Novel approaches such as telehealth and supportive clinical management of T2D by non-physician providers have been recommended to fill gaps in care. With specialty in drug therapy, clinical pharmacists are in a position to uniquely contribute to filling gaps in T2D management related to medication therapy, which are common and often the cause of adverse outcomes in patients with T2D. The objective of this pilot study is to determine the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, fidelity, barriers and facilitators of implementation, and preliminary effectiveness of a telehealth-based clinical pharmacy intervention to inform the design of a subsequently planned fully powered effectiveness-implementation trial of the intervention. This pilot study will involve randomization based on the days the patients had encounters at participating practices (4 in North Carolina). The 2 study arms will be: 1) Usual care, receiving standard practice of care managed by physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants with access to chronic disease management services and 2) Intervention arm, receiving the intervention consisting of clinical pharmacy services including identification and resolution of medication-related problems and patient needs, optimization of medication regimen and T2D education and self-management support, in addition to usual care. The intervention will last for 3 months and will consist of biweekly video/phone calls between patients and the pharmacist. Based on recommendations from literature on pilot studies, the total planned sample size is 240 patients. Implementation science framework by Proctor and colleagues and scales by Weiner and colleagues (for feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and fidelity) and Consolidated Framework for implementation Research (for barriers and facilitators of intervention implementation) will guide collection of data on outcomes. for using complementary medicine and healthcare avoidance. The results of our work will facilitate wide implementation of the intervention and thereby improved outcomes.

Interventions

OTHERtelehealth-based clinical pharmacy intervention

The pharmacist will perform an initial comprehensive review of the medication regimen, make any adjustments, document those in the patient's electronic health record (EHR) and communicate with the patient's T2D care team as needed. They will also call (using an EHR-based software) the patient using phone/video to educate them about T2D self-management and identify any medication-related unmet needs. Periodic reviews of the medication regimen and roughly biweekly follow-up patient calls will occur with frequency based on need (as judged by the pharmacist). Patient intervention calls will be personalized depending on HbA1c levels, comorbidities, and medication complexity

Sponsors

Duke University
CollaboratorOTHER
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

the target sample size in our pilot study is 72 in the intervention group. The target for the control group is 168.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \>= 18 years and \<=75 years (since children have different incidence, management, and outcomes of Type 2 diabetes (T2D) compared to adults and older adults aged more than 75 years may have had their hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) goals adjusted to higher thresholds) * HbA1c reading ≥ 8% recorded during 6 months prior to or up to 9 days after the encounter at the participating practices * Uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (ICD-10-CM code E11.XX) recorded in the EHR in the year prior to up to 1 week after the uncontrolled HbA1c reading

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with gestational or type 1 diabetes * Those enrolled in any other chronic disease management programs delivered by non-physician healthcare professionals * Those receiving T2D care from an endocrinologist * Those receiving long term, hospice, or palliative care services * Those with serious mental illnesses (schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, major depressive disorders, bipolar disorders, and borderline personality disorder) * Those with malignant cancer * Those with cognitive impairment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of items self-reported by pharmacist - FidelityMonth 17Proportion of items self-reported by pharmacist by checking (yes/no/not applicable) in a task-list of program activities
Patient enrollment ratesMonth 13Proportion of eligible patients enrolled
Proportion of patients with complete dataMonth 17Proportion of patients with complete data
Proportion of respondents selecting a response - FeasibilityMonth 17Proportion of respondents selecting a response of agree/strongly agree (disagree/strongly disagree for negatively worded items) on 70% of the survey items measuring perspectives regarding whether it was possible for the respondents to perform the program activities
Proportion of respondents selecting a response - AcceptabilityMonth 17Proportion of respondents selecting a response of agree/strongly agree (disagree/strongly disagree for negatively worded items) on 70% of the survey items measuring perspectives regarding whether they approve and like the program
Proportion of respondents selecting a response - AppropriatenessMonth 17Proportion of respondents selecting a response of agree/strongly agree (disagree/strongly disagree for negatively worded items) on 70% of the survey items measuring perspectives regarding program fit with the needs of the respondents

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Blood PressureMonth 17Change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure from baseline to follow-up - A normal blood pressure can vary between individuals, but the American Heart Association recommend a target blood pressure below 120 mm Hg systolic and 80 mm Hg diastolic. Usually, hypertension is defined as blood pressure above 140/90 and is considered severe if the pressure is above 180/120.
Number of Acute Care DaysMonth 17Change in the number of days spent in emergency room or hospital from baseline to follow-up
Change in patient-reported medication adherence scoresMonth 17Change in patient-reported medication adherence score from baseline to follow-up measured by a survey Change in patient-reported medication adherence score from baseline to follow-up measured by a single item survey: Over the past week, what percent of the time did you take all your diabetes medications as your doctor prescribed? \[11 response categories (0, 10, 20... 100%) with higher score indicating better adherence\]
Change in barriers to medication adherenceMonth 17Change in patient-reported barriers to medication adherence score from baseline to follow-up Adherence Starts with Knowledge-12 survey - measured by Adherence Starts with Knowledge-12 survey (Score can range from 12-60, with higher scores representing greater barriers to adherence.)
Change in HbA1cMonth 17Change in HbA1c from baseline to follow-up - While the usually recommended HbA1c target is \<7.0%, the American Diabetes Association recommends transitioning the HbA1c target to ≥8.0% based on factors such as age, limited life expectancy, complications, history of hypoglycemia, and comorbidities.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026