Skip to content

Potentiated Aminoglycosides in Postoperative Urinary Tract Infection Prophylaxis

Metabolic Potentiation of Aminoglycosides: a Novel Antimicrobial Strategy to Prevent Urinary Tract Infections (UROPOT TRIAL).

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05761405
Acronym
UROPOT
Enrollment
90
Registered
2023-03-09
Start date
2024-01-16
Completion date
2026-04-15
Last updated
2024-02-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urinary Tract Infections, Urological System Complication of Procedure

Brief summary

Urinary tract hardware such as pig-tail catheters are are frequently used for management of urolithiasis or other obstructive pathologies. They are readily colonized by urogenital flora leading to asymptomatic bacteriuria. While asymptomatic bacteriuria is not per se a problem for patients, it may lead to severe infections in the context of hardware manipulation leading to mucosal damage (e.g. catheter exchanges or stone extraction). Such interventions therefore warrant an antibiotic prophylaxis. However, bacteria rapidly form biofilms on hardware; aside of fluoroquinolones, antibiotics have limited anti-biofilm activity. Furthermore, the widespread use of antibiotics has lead to resistant strains. Hence, novel antimicrobial strategies are needed. Recently, metabolism-based potentiation of aminoglycoside has shown high antimicrobial activity against persistent forms of bacteria such as biofilms in the context of murine catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Because of the highly favorable pharmacodynamic profile of aminoglycoside in the urinary tract and the metabolic potentiation, aminoglycosides can be reduced to levels with minimal toxicity. UROPOT aims to compare the efficacy of potentiated aminoglycoside to standard of care for (i) prophylaxis of asymptomatic bacteriuria during urinary hardware manipulations with mucosal trauma (Pig-tail catheter exchange, stone surgery with prior in-dwelling catheter, etc.) and (ii) sustained microbiological eradication through antibiofilm activity. UROPOT will compare the rate of post-interventional urinary tract infections (primary outcome). It will also assess safety and eradication potency (microbiological outcome).

Detailed description

UROPOT is a randomized, single-centre, double-blind, pilot trial comparing a combination of aminoglycosides and mannitol to standard of care or aminoglycosides alone for the peri-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis of endourological procedures with mucosal trauma in the presence of hardware. Adults (≥18 years) scheduled for such procedures with mucosal trauma (stone surgery with hardware, pig-tail catheter exchanges) and having an asymptomatic bacteriuria E. coli or K. pneumoniae as identified 10 days prior to surgery, will be randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive standard prophylaxis (gen. Ceftriaxone 2 g) for 24 hours, a single dose of amikacin (6mg/kg i.v.) or a single dose of mannitol (pres. 2.5g i.v. bolus)/amikacin (3mg/kg i.v.). Sample size for the three groups will be constructed to demonstrate a non-inferiority for the clinical outcome (absence of infectious complication within 48 hours from operation) with a power of 80%. Complications in the absence of antimicrobial prophylaxis range from 2-10%. Patients will be excluded if baseline urine culture has another bacterial pathogen or E. coli or K. pneumoniae are documented to be aminoglycoside resistant. The primary endpoint will be the prevention of complications(clinical) that will be evaluated for non-inferiority compared to the accepted standard of care. i.e., within a 6% margin Assuming a rate of complication as low as 2%, the new treatments will be considered non-inferior if the corresponding rate of complication is not above 8% (i.e., 6% margin). This non-inferiority margin can be evaluated with a total for 128 patients per treatment arm, at 1-sided alpha of 5%, with power 80%, through an exact two-sample test for proportions. Two comparisons will be performed of arm A and of arm B versus standard of care (SoC). In addition, a microbiological outcome will be included to document higher biofilm eradication rate. This will be documented by sonication of extracted hardware as well as repeat urine culture at post-operative days 7 and 14 days (secondary outcomes). Safety will be monitored with a specific focus on nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. If highly efficient, this novel antimicrobial strategy would be expanded to treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTmannitol-enhanced aminoglycoside

Preselected patients with ureteral stents in situ who are scheduled to undergo endourological ureteral stent manipulation will have routine urine cultures prior to intervention. Procedures: Consented patients will be randomized for the type of antibiotic prophylaxis according to a global randomization list (i.e. CRO, AMK, AMK1/2+MAN)). Antibiotics (± mannitol) will be delivered in a single infusion that will be administered within 30 minutes.

Preselected patients with ureteral stents in situ who are scheduled to undergo endourological ureteral stent manipulation will have routine urine cultures prior to intervention. Procedures: Consented patients will be randomized for the type of antibiotic prophylaxis according to a global randomization list (i.e. CRO, AMK, AMK1/2+MAN)). Antibiotics will be delivered in a single infusion that will be administered within 30 minutes.

DRUGAmikacin

Preselected patients with ureteral stents in situ who are scheduled to undergo endourological ureteral stent manipulation will have routine urine cultures prior to intervention.

Sponsors

Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
CollaboratorOTHER
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
CollaboratorOTHER
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Masking description

The pharmacy prepares a randomization list with an additional 20% to account for drop-outs. Based on this, the pharmacy prepares labels (study ID, local center ID, subject ID) and a randomization list (subject ID, open-label treatment (i.e. AMK, AMK+MAN, CRO)). These are delivered to the blinded to the patient awaiting surgery with anonymized subject IDs (consecutive numbering). The investigator has no access to this list.

Intervention model description

Randomized, multicentre, double-blind

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent * Adults (≥18 years) * Ureteral stent in situ * Patients scheduled for endourological ureteral manipulations (e.g. endourological stone surgery, ureteral stent exchange) * Asymptomatic bacteriuria with strains of E. coli and/or K. pneumoniae sensitive to Ceftriaxone and Amikacin/Aminoglycosides.

Exclusion criteria

* Allergy to one of the study drugs Beta-lactams, aminoglycosides or mannitol * Pregnant and lactating women * Glomerular filtration rate (CKD-EPI eGFR) \< 50ml/min / 1,73m2 * Hearing impairment * Myasthenia gravis or other forms of myoneural disorders * Congestive heart failure, Pulmonary edema * Intracranial hemorrhage, blood-brain barrier compromise * Previous (within 3 months prior to randomization) or concomitant participation in another interventional clinical trial * Antibiotic treatment within 14 days prior to randomization * Mixed cultures of E. coli and/or K. pneumonia with other bacteria * Inability to understand and follow the protocol * Inability to give informed consent * BMI\<20 or \>30

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Infection prophylaxis48 hours postoperativelyIncidence of postoperative infections within the initial 48 hours postoperatively.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Combined microbiological eradication6-8 hours post infusionanti-biofilm activity as determined by culture of sonicated catheter (CFU/ml) and intraoperative urine culture (CFU/ml)
Sustained microbiological eradicationUp to 2 weeksTo document eradication of bacteriuria at postoperative day 2 and 14 day by urine culture (CFU/ml)
Surgical safety outcomeDay 0-14Postoperative complications
Pharmacokinetics outcomeDay 0, Day 2, Day 14Measurements of maximum urine drug concentrations (Amikacin, Ceftriaxone, Mannitol)
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]Day 0-Day 14Safety and tolerability of Amikacin/Mannitol combination (serious adverse events (SAEs), pre-specified adverse events (AEs) of special interest (ototoxicity, nephrotoxicity).

Countries

Switzerland

Contacts

Primary ContactSylvain Meylan, MD-PhD
sylvain.meylan@chuv.ch+41795569418
Backup ContactBeat Roth, Prof.
beat.roth@chuv.ch+41213142981

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026