Skip to content

Human Papilloma Virus Genotypes and Treatment Outcomes of Intralesional Immunotherapy of Anogenital Warts

Human Papilloma Virus Genotypes and Treatment Outcomes of Intralesional Immunotherapy of Anogenital Warts

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05761002
Enrollment
58
Registered
2023-03-09
Start date
2022-06-01
Completion date
2023-07-01
Last updated
2023-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anogenital Wart, Human Papilloma Virus

Brief summary

This study aims to investigate the relationship between HPV genotypes and treatment outcomes of intralesional immunotherapy of anogenital warts with the quadrivalent vaccine (Gardasil).

Detailed description

Human papillomavirus (HPV), a member of the Papillomaviridae family, is a small, icosahedral, non-enveloped virus with a circular double-stranded DNA genome. Sexually transmitted HPV, which mainly infects mucosal and keratinized epithelium, has a cytopathic effect on the epithelium. Genital mucosal HPV infection is persistent and multifocal and can be subclinical (Alacam & Bakir, 2021). Infection with HPV causes a large proportion of cervical, vaginal, vulvar, anal, and penile cancers, as well as genital warts (Choi, 2019). Anogenital warts are common benign dermatological conditions caused by different HPV genotypes, with serotypes 6, 11, 16, and 18 being the most causative types (Santos-López et al., 2015). Their prevalence varies according to geographical locations. Data is not yet available on the HPV burden in the general population of Egypt (Elazab et al., 2021). In October 2014, a very important multicenter observational study in Egypt concluded that the prevalence of HPV among Egyptian women aged 18 years or more is about 10.4%, with the highest prevalence of HPV infection being observed among women aged 45-54 years (Shaltout et al., 2014). Different modalities are available for the treatment of warts, such as topical podophyllin, imiquimod, podophyllotoxin, or trichloroacetic acid, surgical excision, electrosurgery, cryosurgery, laser surgery, and intralesional immunotherapy (Gill, 2021; Nofal et al., 2022). Available treatments are time-consuming, painful, and can leave scars or hypopigmentation. Furthermore, recurrence rates after any treatment range from 6% to 100% (Ciccarese et al., 2019). As a result, there has been a demand for safer modalities to treat recalcitrant warts. Immunotherapy presents an alternative approach to the management of warts as it provides ease of application, but even distant lesions get resolved with application to a single lesion. Immunotherapy has been performed with imiquimod, BCG vaccine, HPV vaccines, and auto implantation therapy (Gill, 2021). Three HPV vaccines are licensed as protective measures against the development of genital warts, cervical cancer, and other anogenital cancers. They include the bivalent vaccine targeting serotypes 16/18 (Cervarix), the quadrivalent vaccine targeting serotypes 6/11/16/18 (Gardasil), and the nonavalent vaccine targeting serotypes 6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58 (Gardasil-9) (Vaccine Information Statement \| HPV \| VIS \| CDC, 2021). There is a strong immune response against the HPV vaccine that not only causes the clearance of local wart lesions but also causes the clearance of distant lesions. The vaccine is designed to elicit neutralizing antibody responses which prevent initial infection with HPV, but in warts it mainly acts by mounting cell-mediated and humoral responses which help in the clearance of warts. The quadrivalent HPV vaccine contains inactive L1 proteins from four different strains: 6, 11, 16, and 18; synthesized in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Gill, 2021).

Interventions

BIOLOGICALthe Quadrivalent Vaccine (Gardasil)

• Intralesional injection of the quadrivalent HPV vaccine (Gardasil) at a dose of 0.5ml, into the largest wart at 4-week intervals until complete clearance is achieved or for a maximum of three sessions.

Sponsors

Zagazig University
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- Patients with clinically diagnosed multiple anogenital warts who had not received treatment in the last 2 months before the study

Exclusion criteria

* Patient refusal, pregnancy, lactation, age less than 10 years, and immunosuppressive conditions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
improvement of lesion6 monthThe response will be considered complete if there is disappearance of the warts, partial if the warts regressed in size by 50-99% and no response if there is 0-49% decrease in wart size.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026