Skip to content

Stick Together - Pilot Intervention Study

Stick Together - a Dyadic Web-intervention for Younger Patients with Breast Cancer and Their Partners

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05760755
Enrollment
44
Registered
2023-03-08
Start date
2023-02-01
Completion date
2024-08-06
Last updated
2024-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer Female

Brief summary

This pilot study investigates the acceptability and feasibility of 'Stick Together', a self-guided online intervention, for younger women with breast cancer and their cohabiting partners.

Detailed description

This one-arm feasibility study pilots the 'Stick Together' intervention among 20 women newly diagnosed with breast cancer at age 25-49 and their cohabiting partners. The intervention aims to strengthen couples' positive dyadic coping and communication, as well as participants mental health and quality of life, as well as quality of life of underage children.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALStick Together

The intervention consists of 12 online modules, completed flexibly during and immediately after primary cancer treatment. The intervention contains interviews with other couples, psychoeducational information, and interactive exercises on themes such as dyadic coping and communication, being diagnosed at a young age, fertility and children, and life after treatment.

Sponsors

Danish Committee for Health Education
CollaboratorOTHER
TrygFonden, Denmark
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Sygekassernes Helsefond
CollaboratorOTHER
Danish Cancer Society
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen
CollaboratorOTHER
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
25 Years to 49 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

(patients): * women newly diagnosed with first primary breast cancer, treated with curative intent at Department of breast surgery, Gentofte Hospital * living with a romantic partner Inclusion Criteria (partners): * living in romantic partnership with a patient eligible for the intervention

Exclusion criteria

(both patients and partners): * severe relationship difficulties or current couples counselling * severe, untreated mental illness in one or both partners * capable of participating (mastery of Danish language, available smartphone, tablet or other device, no cognitive impairment)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participation (Acceptability 1)baselinePercentage of eligible participants consenting to participate
Participants satisfaction (Acceptability 2)Post-intervention follow-up (7-9 months post diagnosis)Percentage of participants satisfied with the intervention
Completion (Feasibility)Post-intervention (7-9 months post diagnosis)Percentage of participants completing the intervention (65% completion)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline to post-intervention in stress communicationBaseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)Score on stress communication (min 4, max 20), as measured by the Dyadic coping inventory subscale. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
Change from baseline to post-intervention in satisfaction with dyadic copingBaseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)Score on satisfaction with dyadic coping (min 2, max 10), as measured by the Dyadic coping inventory subscale. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
Change from baseline to post-intervention in joint dyadic copingBaseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)Score on joint dyadic coping (min 5, max 25), as measured by the Dyadic coping inventory subscale. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
Change from baseline to post-intervention in perceived stressBaseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)Score on perceived stress (min 0, max 16), as measured by the Perceived Stress Scale. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Change from baseline to post-intervention in anxietyBaseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)Score on anxiety symptoms (min 0, max 21), as measured by the Generalized anxiety scale-7. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Change from baseline to post-intervention in depressionBaseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)Score on depression symptoms (min 0, max 27), as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Change from baseline to post-intervention in supportive dyadic copingBaseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)Score on supportive dyadic coping (min 5, max 25), as measured by the Dyadic coping inventory subscale. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
Change from baseline to post-intervention in active engagementBaseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)Score on active engagement (min 5, max 25), as measured by the Ways of Giving Support-questionnaire subscale. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
Change from baseline to post-intervention in overprotectionBaseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)Score on overprotection (min 6, max 30), as measured by the Ways of Giving Support-questionnaire subscale. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Change from baseline to post-intervention in psychological quality of lifeBaseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)Score on psychological quality of life (min 0, max 100), as measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version subscale (WHOQOL-BREF). Higher scores indicate better outcome.
Change from baseline to post-intervention in physical quality of lifeBaseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)Score on physical quality of life (min 0, max 100), as measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version scubscale (WHOQOL-BREF). Higher scores indicate better outcome.
Change from baseline to post-intervention in social quality of lifeBaseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)Score on social quality of life (min 0, max 100), as measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version subscale (WHOQOL-BREF). Higher scores indicate better outcome.
Change from baseline to post-intervention in children's quality of lifeBaseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)Total mean score on quality of life (min 0, max 100), as measured by the Pediatric Quality of LIfe inventory (PEDSQL). Higher scores indicate better outcome.
Change from baseline to post-intervention in protective bufferingBaseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)Score on protective buffering (min 8, max 40), as measured by the Ways of Giving Support-questionnaire subscale. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Change from baseline to post-intervention in delegated dyadic copingBaseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)Score on delegated dyadic coping (min 2, max 10), as measured by the Dyadic coping inventory subscale. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
Change from baseline to post-intervention in negative dyadic copingBaseline, after intervention completion (average 8 months after diagnosis)Score on negative dyadic coping (min 4, max 20), as measured by the Dyadic coping inventory subscale. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026