Skip to content

Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial

Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial: A Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05758857
Acronym
Ms FIT
Enrollment
30
Registered
2023-03-08
Start date
2022-11-06
Completion date
2023-06-28
Last updated
2023-12-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metabolic Disturbance, Sedentary Behavior

Keywords

primary prevention

Brief summary

Ms. FIT pilot is a pilot study of a 3-arm RCT with equal recruitment and stratification of pre and postmenopausal women with risk factors for chronic disease to: 1) Canadian guidelines-based physical activity alone; 2) Canadian guidelines-based physical activity and healthy eating; or 3) stretching attention control. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the interventions. The objectives are to: 1) pilot test the intervention delivery protocol in a real-world application (management and technical capabilities of the research group); 2) evaluate adherence and participant acceptability of a combined in-person and virtual intervention delivery in both pre and post-menopausal women; 3) identify the preliminary efficacy of the interventions on select cardiometabolic risk markers.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALExperimental: Guidelines-based physical activity

Through a combination of exercise trainer-led in-person and virtual sessions, as well as counselling for independent aerobic exercise, participants will be guided to achieve 150 weekly minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity and twice weekly whole-body muscle strengthening.

BEHAVIORALExperimental: Guidelines-based healthy eating

One-on-one phone/virtual counselling from a registered dietitian to change dietary habits to be in line with Canada's Food Guide.

BEHAVIORALStretching exercise

Twice weekly virtual instructor-led whole-body stretching class.

Sponsors

Women's College Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Toronto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

It is not possible to blind participants to their assigned intervention. Care providers are not involved. The outcome assessors for any assessments involving potential for subjectivity in data collection or analysis will be blinded to group assignment.

Intervention model description

3-arm parallel-group randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
30 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* females * pre- or postmenopausal * aged 30+ years * moderate or high Canadian Diabetes Risk Score score

Exclusion criteria

* diagnoses of cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, cancer (except for non-melanoma skin cancer), or respiratory disease (i.e., COPD) * major signs or symptoms (regardless of known diagnosis) of cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, or renal disease * pregnant or lactating * mobility limitations to exercise * smoking cigarettes within the past 3 months * using transdermal hormones, taking exogenous hormones or receiving exogenous hormones from other means (e.g. intrauterine device) * self-report of \>30 min/week of MVPA * following a specific dietary practice (e.g., vegan, ketogenic) in last 3 months * presenting with any of the American Heart Association's absolute or relative contraindications for symptom-limited maximal exercise testing * requiring and do not receive medical clearance for maximal exercise * cannot read and understand the consent form or communicate in English * individuals who are students in classes of the professors who are involved in the study or students with whom the professors have a supervisory relationship

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diet quality intervention feasibilityend of week 6Determined as a 5-point improvement in diet quality measured via healthy eating index from 3-day diet record
Physical activity intervention feasibilityend of week 6Determined as an average adherence to physical activity guidelines of ≥100% measured via Garmin smartwatch
Intervention acceptabilityend of week 6Assessed via researcher-developed questionnaire

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Framingham 10-year risk (%)6 weeksCalculated using standardized scoring system
Aortic stiffness (central to femoral)6 weeksMeasured via Shygmacor device
Lipid profile6 weeksanalyzed from blood
C-Reactive Protein6 weeksanalyzed from blood
Systemic insulin resistance6 weeksAs assessed by the Matsuda Index calculated from an oral glucose tolerance test
Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)6 weekscalculated as: (fasting insulin\*fasting glucose)/22.5
Cardiorespiratory fitness6 weeksMeasured as peak volume of oxygen consumption via indirect calorimetry
Whole-body fat and fat free mass6 weeksMeasured by BodPod
Body circumferences6 weeksWaist, hip and neck circumferences measured by inelastic tape
Depressive symptoms6 weeksmeasured by Beck Depression Inventory; score ranges from 0-63 with a higher score indicating more severe depression
Dietary intake6 weeksAssessed via ASA-24 3-day food records
Menopausal symptom presence and severity6 weeksassessed by The Menopause-specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) questionnaire. Each of four domains is constrained between 1 to 8 where a higher score indicates more symptoms.
Health-related quality of life6 weeksAssessed by RAND-36, where an independent score is provided for 8 scales ranging from 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating better quality of life
Psychosocial stress6 weeksassessed by the perceived stress scale where individual scores can range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress
Brachial artery endothelial function6 weeksMeasured via flow-mediated dilatation test
Blood pressure6 weeksMeasured after several minutes of supine rest

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Menopausal symptom presence and severity6 monthsassessed by The Menopause-specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) questionnaire. Each of four domains is constrained between 1 to 8 where a higher score indicates more symptoms.
Dietary intake6 monthsAssessed via ASA-24 3-day food records
Depressive symptoms6 monthsmeasured by Beck Depression Inventory; score ranges from 0-63 with a higher score indicating more severe depression
Body circumferences6 monthsWaist, hip and neck circumferences measured by inelastic tape
Whole-body fat and fat free mass6 monthsMeasured by BodPod
Cardiorespiratory fitness6 monthsMeasured as peak volume of oxygen consumption via indirect calorimetry
Blood pressure6 monthsMeasured after several minutes of supine rest
Physical activity intervention feasibility6 monthsDetermined as an average adherence to physical activity guidelines of ≥100% measured via Garmin smartwatch
Diet quality intervention feasibility6 monthsDetermined as a 5-point improvement in diet quality measured via healthy eating index from 3-day diet record
Psychosocial stress6 monthsassessed by the perceived stress scale where individual scores can range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress
Health-related quality of life6 monthsAssessed by RAND-36, where an independent score is provided for 8 scales ranging from 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating better quality of life
Intervention acceptability6 monthsAssessed via researcher-developed questionnaire

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 8, 2026