Skip to content

Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) of Open Debridement Versus Tenex

Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) of Open Debridement Versus Percutaneous Ultrasonic Treatment for Symptomatic Lateral Epicondylitis.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05757739
Acronym
Tenex
Enrollment
90
Registered
2023-03-07
Start date
2023-02-09
Completion date
2028-12-01
Last updated
2026-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Orthopedic Devices Associated With Misadventures

Brief summary

Lateral epicondylitis (Tennis Elbow) can cause pain and keep individuals from completing their daily activities and require them to miss work. There are currently different treatment options to address tennis elbow. However surgeons do not know if one is better than the other. This study will compare two treatment options for tennis elbow. Participants will either be treated by Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Tenotomy Technique or Open Surgical Debridement. Traditional open surgical debridement is a surgical procedure that requires the surgeon to make an incision to remove the damaged tissue. This procedure is done under anesthesia in a surgery center. In the Tenex procedure, the surgeon inserts a special needle into the damaged portion of the tendon under ultrasound guidance. Ultrasonic energy vibrates the damaged tissue and it can be suctioned out. This procedure is done with local anesthesia in surgeon's office.

Detailed description

During the initial screening visit, the physician will obtain your medical history and perform a physical exam. If you pass the screening, you will be randomized into either Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Tenotomy Technique or Open Surgical Debridement. It will be a 50% chance. It will be compared to flipping a coin. Once you have been placed in your treatment group, your treatment will be scheduled. You will have follow up appointments with your physician to monitor your progress at 3 week(visit 3), 6 weeks (visit 4), 3 months (visit 5) 6 month (visit 6), and 12 month (visit 7) time points. You will also be requested to complete patient questionnaires about your progress at visits 3-7.

Interventions

PROCEDUREOpen Debridement Surgical Intervention Treatment Plan

Operative treatment will be performed under anesthesia, and debridement of the extensor tendon's common origin will be performed with an open assessment of the tendon origin with tendon repair or reattachment

PROCEDURETenex Procedure

In the Tenex procedure, the surgeon inserts a special needle into the damaged portion of the tendon under ultrasound guidance. Ultrasonic energy vibrates the damaged tissue and it can be suctioned out. This procedure is done with local anesthesia in surgeon's office.

Sponsors

Sean Mc Millan
Lead SponsorOTHER
Dr. Sean Mcmillan
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Dr. Thomas Plut
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Dr. Nathan Bodin
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Individuals 18-70 years of age * Clinically documented chronic lateral epicondylitis with a minimum of 6 months of persistent elbow pain that impedes daily activities. * Failed alternative treatment for \> 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

* Surgical procedure on affected extremity within last six months. * Dermatological disorder in affected area * Currently pregnant, confirmed via pregnancy test. * Blood disorders, autoimmune disorders, disorders requiring immunosuppression, cancer, malignancies, an ongoing infectious disease, or sickle cell or other blood disorders. * Failed prior surgical procedure on the affected joint. * No prior effort to treat (stretching, rest, medication) or implementation of external protocol in an effort to improve condition (physical therapy, massage treatment, rehabilitation techniques).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The objective of this study is to compare, complications, function outcomes, in patients treated with traditional open surgical techniques versus ultrasonic ablationStudy Enrollment PeriodThe objective of this study is to compare, complications, function outcomes, in patients treated with traditional open surgical techniques versus ultrasonic ablation

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTDonna Hoopes
dhoopes@virtua.org856-355-1206

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 13, 2026