Skip to content

CPAP Versus HFNO for the Treatment of Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Due to Community Acquired Pneumonia

CPAP Versus High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen for the Treatment of Patients With Community Acquired Pneumonia Induced Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in the Ward

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05755425
Enrollment
100
Registered
2023-03-06
Start date
2022-02-22
Completion date
2024-01-30
Last updated
2023-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pneumonia, Respiratory Failure

Keywords

CPAP, HFNO

Brief summary

the study compares two non-invasive respiratory support modalities ie CPAP and High Flow nasal cannula oxygen for the treatment of severe hypoxemic respiratory failure attributed to Community acquired Pneumonia.

Detailed description

CPAP and High Flow nasal cannula oxygen are two established modalities for non-invasive respiratory support . In COVID pandemic era both CPAP and HFNO were widely used in the ward for the treatment of COVID-19 induced acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in order to prevent progression to intubation. Head to head comparison between the two modalities mentioned for the treatment of severe hypoxemic respiratory failure is not available neither in COVID pneumonia or Community acquired pneumonia (CAP).

Interventions

DEVICECPAP

CPAP will be delivered with a CPAP valve with venturi flow system with full-face mask. Treatment will start with CPAP set at 10cmH2O and FiO2 60% to target a SpO2 ≥90% or PO2 ≥60mmHg and then adjusted according to SpO2, respiratory distress and clinical tolerance

DEVICEHFNO

HFNO will be applied initially at maximal settings: 100% FiO2, flow rate 60 L/min and temperature 37C . Within 1 to 2 h, the HFNO settings should be titrated based on patients respiratory rate (\<25-30 per minute), SpO2 (92-96%) and comfort

Sponsors

University of Thessaly
CollaboratorOTHER
Evangelismos Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients with age \>18 year old. * Been hospitalized with community acquired pneumonia * hospitalized in common ward (not ICU) * Patients should have pneumonia- pulmonary infiltrates in chest-xray and hypoxemic respiratory failure. * Patients should be unable to keep: SpO2\>93% with FiO2 50%, or SpO2 95% with FiO2 50% and have evidence of respiratory distress defined as Respiratory rate -RR\>35/min

Exclusion criteria

* Need for immediate or imminent intubation * not fit for escalation of treatment: defined as intubation, mechanical ventilation and ICU support. * Pregnant women * Contraindication to CPAP or HFNO

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
days free from ventilatory support28 daysdays without support with either mechanical ventilation, HFNO, CPAP

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
intubation rate28 days
hospital mortality28 days
treatment failure defined28 daysno of patients that needed intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation or died
hospital length of stay28 days
Partial pressure of oxygen PaO2 change at 2h, 12h and 24h28 days
days under non-invasive respiratory support28 daysdays without support with HFNO or CPAP

Countries

Greece

Contacts

Primary ContactIOANNA SIGALA, PhD
giannasig@yahoo.com+302132041712
Backup ContactIOANNIS KALOMENIDIS, PhD
ikalom@med.uoa.gr+302132041712

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026