Skip to content

A Closed Surgical Technique vs Papilla Preservation Techniques

A Closed Surgical Technique for the Treatment of Residual Periodontal Pockets vs Access Flap Utilizing Papilla Preservation Techniques. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05754307
Acronym
CST
Enrollment
44
Registered
2023-03-03
Start date
2023-03-03
Completion date
2024-12-30
Last updated
2024-04-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Periodontitis

Keywords

interdental periodontal defect, periodontal surgery, papilla preservation, tunnelling technique, closed surgical technique

Brief summary

A pioneer periodontal surgical approach employing the closed surgical technique (CST) has been designed to gain access to isolated interdental periodontal defects and retain the soft-tissue architecture. This technique is based on a modified tunnelling technique to retract full-thickness gingival flaps from the osseous defect in a closed manner retaining intact the interproximal papilla thus, suturing is not required. A randomised controlled clinical trial will determine the efficacy of the CST versus the access flap employing papilla preservation techniques over a period of 6 months.

Detailed description

This randomised controlled clinical trial will compare the CST over the access flap employing papilla preservation techniques to treat isolated interdental defects in terms of gain in clinical attachment levels, radiographic evidence of bone apposition and local reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines over a period of 6 months. 1. First visit - initial examination - at least 3 months after initial non-surgical periodontal treatment (Step 1, 2) Update general and dental history Screening of subjects for suitability; Consent form; Randomization of suitable subjects Intra-oral photography Full-mouth charting: Probing pocket depth (PPD), Clinical Attachment Level (CAL), Plaque Index (PI), Bleeding on Probing (BoP), Gingival Recession (Rec) Oral hygiene instructions (soft toothbrush, modified Bass, interdental cleaning) Full mouth supragingival scaling 2. Second visit - Baseline - T0 Collection of Gingival Crevice Fluid (GCF) using sterilized paper strips Radiographic examination of the site (Long-cone paralleling technique using a digital sensor attached to a custom-made silicone bite block for reproducible radiographs) Periodontal site-selected clinical assessment Periodontal surgery (control: access flap with papilla preservation techniques or test: the CST) under local anaesthesia Modification of oral hygiene instructions; post-operative instructions Intra-oral photography 3. Third visit - T1 (2 weeks post-operatively) Suture removal (only in control group) Wound healing visual monitoring by the Early Healing Index (1-5) Oral hygiene instructions Intra-oral photography Questionnaire for subjective feelings and satisfaction 4. Fourth visit - T2 (6 weeks post-operatively) Oral hygiene instructions Intra-oral photography 5. Fifth visit - T3 - Re-evaluation (6 months post-operatively) GCF collection using sterilized paper strips Periodontal full-mouth charting Site-selected periodontal clinical assessment; Probing Pocket depth (PPD), Clinical Attachment Level (CAL), Plaque Index (PI), Bleeding on Probing (BoP), Gingival Recession (Rec Radiographic examination of the site Oral hygiene instructions Intra-oral photography

Interventions

PROCEDUREAccess Flap

Intrasulcular incisions at the teeth adjacent to the defect, using the simplified papilla preservation technique (SPPT) or modified papilla preservation technique (MPPT). Granulation tissue is excised and debridement via hand and power-driven instruments follows. Flaps are repositioned and papilla are sutured with horizontal internal mattress doubled by a single interrupted interdental suture.

Strictly intrasulcular incisions are performed at the teeth adjacent to the defect (mid-buccal to mid-lingual) without incising the interdental papilla. Full thickness gingival flaps, at the base of the papilla, which is retained intact, are elevated in a closed-tunneling manner, granting access to the interdental osseous defect. Debridement is performed via power-driven tips and mini curettes, without intentionally excising the granulation tissue that lines the osseous defect. Flaps are repositioned by gentle pressure and suturing is not required.

Sponsors

Danae A. Apatzidou
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Treatment is disclosed to the examiner after all data have been collected.

Intervention model description

Randomised controlled clinical trial having 2 parallel intervention arms for surgical treatment (step 3) of interproximal residual defects (PPD≥6mm and BoP)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Systematically healthy subjects, not having consumed antibiotics 3 months before surgical periodontal treatment (baseline) * Smokers \<5 cig/day, former smokers or no smokers * Periodontal patients fulfilling non surgical initial periodontal treatment at least 3 months before surgical periodontal treatment (baseline day) and presenting at least one residual pocket with PPD and CAL ≥6mm and bleeding on probing, located interproximally with intrerdental site ≥2mm. * Compliant patients presenting high standards of oral hygiene (full mouth Plaque Index \<20%) strictly susceptible in Supportive Periodontal Treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Untreated active periodontal inflammation * Poorly controlled systematic diseases * Disorders compromise wound healing * Bisphosphonate medications * Patients under radiotherapy or chemotherapy * Drug-indused gingival hyperplasia * Pregnancy or lactation * Poor compliance during steps 1 and 2 of cause-related periodontal treatment * Compromised oral hygiene (full mouth Plaque Index \>30%), circumferential bone defect or narrow intrerdental site ≤2mm.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Attachment Levelbaseline to 6 monthsDetermined by a manual periodontal probe(Hu-Friedy XP-23/QW) by a single examiner at the nearest of 1mm
Cementoenamel junction to Bottom of the defectbaseline to 6 monthsDetermined on standardised periapical radiographs obtained by the long cone parallel technique

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Levels of proinflammatory cytokinesbaseline to 6 monthsDetermined by ELISA in GCF
Probing Pocket Depthbaseline to 6 monthsDetermined by a manual periodontal probe
Patient satisfaction and perception2 weeks following sureryDetermined on questionnaires
Bleeding on Probingbaseline to 6 monthsDetermined by a manual periodontal probe
Recessionbaseline to 6 monthsDetermined by a manual periodontal probe

Countries

Greece

Contacts

Primary ContactDanae Apatzidou, Associate Professor
perioapatzidou@yahoo.gr6934770361
Backup ContactAthanasios Tsolakis, PG student
tantsisa@yahoo.gr+306980593980

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026