Skip to content

Trapeziectomy: Internal Brace vs. Ligament Reconstruction (Prospective)

Trapeziectomy With Internal Brace Versus Ligament Reconstruction With Tendon Interposition; a Prospective Study

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05753891
Enrollment
28
Registered
2023-03-03
Start date
2023-04-01
Completion date
2024-07-03
Last updated
2026-04-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Basilar Thumb Arthritis

Brief summary

This study seeks to compare two methods of trapeziectomy for basilar thumb arthritis. The first is trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition, which means removing the trapezium bone and filling the void with a tendon graft. This is the most commonly used procedure and the control group. The experimental group is trapeziectomy with suture tape suspension of the 1st metacarpal to the 2nd metacarpal. This is using a device called the InternalBrace, produced by Arthrex.

Interventions

DEVICESuture Tape Reconstruction

This intervention will utilize a suture tape to suspend the 1st and 2nd metacarpal post trapeziectomy compared to the standard procedure of a trapeziectomy followed by ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition.

Sponsors

Henry Ford Health System
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients of Henry Ford Orthopedic Service Line * Symptomatic basilar thumb arthritis refractory to conservative management

Exclusion criteria

* Significant medical comorbidity precluding safe surgery, as determined by the operating surgeon. This may include cardiac disease, renal disease, liver disease, pulmonary disease, or heavy substance abuse. * Requirement for additional procedures at the 1st carpometacarpal joint, including trapezoid excision-whole or partial-or metacarpal osteotomy. Of note other existing conditions requiring intervention on a separate surgical site such as concomitant carpal tunnel syndrome or trigger fingers will NOT be used as

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pinch Strength6 months post procedurePinch Strength measurements

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PROMIS-UE6 months post procedurePROMIS-UE scores are reported as T-scores standardized to the U.S. population (mean 50, SD 10; typical range \~15-61). Higher scores indicate better upper extremity function.

Countries

United States

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
18 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants
Age, Continuous66.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 170 / 5
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 170 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 170 / 5

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 18, 2026