Achilles Tendinopathy
Conditions
Brief summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn more about and compare the effectiveness of standard of care (SOC) physical therapy (PT), PT with photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT; low-level laser therapy), PT with shockwave therapy (SWT; high-energy acoustic wave therapy), and PT with PBMT and SWT, to improve function, decrease pain, and resolve symptoms in individuals with non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy. The main question it aims to answer is: • What is the most effective treatment method for non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy? Participants will Researchers will compare PT, PT + SWT, PT + SWT and PBMT to assess the most effective treatment for Achilles tendinopathy.
Detailed description
Non-insertional Achilles Tendinopathy (AT) is a common overuse injury in adults who are both athletes and nonactive. Tendinopathy occurs when there is either a failed healing response or the failure of normal turnover or remodeling response, and results in pain and limited movement. In the military, lower-extremity injuries due to overuse, (e.g., AT) are the most common category of injuries. The most common treatment of choice for AT is exercise loading programs, however eccentric strengthening (ECC) may only improve symptoms in approximately 60% of patients. Laser-induced photobiomodulation (PBM) has been shown to increase cell proliferation and metabolism, which may aid in the repair and remodeling process. Studies have found that PBM was effective in the treatment of AT. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is a process in which energy is delivered to the muscles or tendons for pain relief. Current literature supports the use of ESWT as an effective treatment for AT in combination with ECC. Overall, studies indicate that ESWT and photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) will be effective in treating tendon injuries such as AT, however, these treatment methods have not been evaluated in comparison or combination with each other. The sub-section of AT amongst Active-Duty personnel has very limited research and given the high prevalence, should be addressed. Therefore, our study will compare three different treatment arms utilizing traditional physical therapy (PT), PT plus ESWT, PT plus PBMT, and PT plus ESWT and PBMT. Both self-reported questionnaires and measured outcomes will be used to assess the most effective treatment for AT.
Interventions
All participants may complete a PT program as standard of care (SOC) treatment addressing individual strength, mobility, and flexibility deficits in both proximal (e.g. spine and hip girdle) along with distal (thigh, leg, and foot/ankle) muscle groups. The provider may also use other modalities to address distal issues. To standardize the loading program, all participants will be given an at-home exercise program designed by Dr. Karin Sibernagel for progressive Achilles tendon loading. The participants will also follow the University of Delaware Return to Sport protocol for return to running. This will be completed alongside the standard of care PT participants will be receiving.
A medical provider will conduct SWT on study participants using the OrthoPlus Ultra 100. This Extracorporeal Pressure Activation Treatment device will be used at a radial shockwave of 3000 counts treatment settings of 15 Hz minimum 2 bars with a focus applicator head at mid-portion of Achilles using clinical focusing technique, and 3000 counts at 15 Hz minimum 2.5 bars using broad oscillator to myotendinous region and over symptomatic areas of gastrocnemius and soleus, treatment will be applied distally to proximally to facilitate lymphatic return adjusting treatment air pressure and amount of force applied by applicator head by patient comfort. The maximum setting for each treatment applicator will be 4 bars of air pressure, and the first 500 counts using each applicator will be applied at 1.5 bars to help desensitize the tissue prior to increasing energy settings. The settings used for each participant will be recorded and followed in a similar approach to treatment.
PBMT is delivered with the LightForce® XPi 25W device through the Smart Hand Piece technology. The therapy is transmitted with a rolling glass massage ball at 10 Joules/cm\^2 that is applied in a serpentine manner over the site of injury.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* DEERS Eligible * Between the ages of 18-64 * Currently Active Duty in any of the US Armed Forces * Clinical diagnosis of mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy (including both unilateral and bilateral) by a healthcare provider based on accepted diagnostic criteria. * Able to read and understand English language for consent purposes * Able to commit to 3-weeks of intervention and 6-months of follow-up
Exclusion criteria
* Primary insertional Achilles tendinopathy * Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP), corticosteroid injection, or prolotherapy within 3 months * Received dry needling within the past 4 weeks * Previously completed the Silbernagel protocol for Achilles tendinopathy within the past 3 months * Received SWT within the past 3 months to their Achilles * Tattoo in the area of treatment (due to sensitivity to PBMT) * Current use of pacemaker * Patients with a known underlying cardiac disease that could be affected by SWT * Patients with neuropathy affecting sensation to pain * Current use of medications associated with sensitivity to heat or light (e.g. amiodarone, chlorpromazine, doxycycline, hydrochlorothiazide, nalidixic acid, naproxen, piroxicam, tetracycline, thioridazine, voriconazole) * Current or chronic sciatica (lumbosacral radiculopathy) resulting in chronic or intermittent lower extremity pain, numbness, or tingling. * Achilles tendon tear or prior Achilles tendon surgery * Recent lower extremity injury within the last 3 months that required professional medical attention (e.g., ankle sprain, meniscus) * Concurrent participation in another research study addressing pain issue * Previously enrolled in the study for contralateral (opposite) leg * Currently pregnant or plan to become pregnant during intervention period (safety of PBM not established in pregnancy) as determined by hCG urine test * Diagnosis of rheumatological disease/connective tissue condition, symptomatic arthritis of foot and ankle, a primary running related injury outside of Achilles tendinopathy, or other contraindications to PBMT or SWT
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A) | Baseline | The VISA-A (Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles) is a questionnaire designed to assess the severity of Achilles tendinopathy. It consists of eight questions that evaluate pain, function in daily life, and sports activities. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100, with lower scores indicating more severe symptoms and limitations |
| Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) | Baseline | The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) is a questionnaire used to assess a person's ability to perform everyday activities involving the lower limbs. It consists of 20 questions, each scored from 0 to 4, with a minimum score of 0 and maximum total score of 80. Key Points: Higher scores indicate better lower extremity function. Lower scores suggest greater disability or difficulty in movement. |
| Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) | Baseline | The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a pain assessment tool designed specifically for military personnel and veterans Rating scale from 0-10. Higher scores equal worse outcomes. |
| University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) | Baseline | The University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) is a questionnaire designed to assess a runner's recovery from running-related injuries. Scores range from 0-36, with higher scores equaling better outcomes. |
| Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Baseline | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) has seven categories: Physical Function (higher scores = better function), Anxiety (higher scores = more anxiety), Depression (higher scores = more depression), Fatigue (higher scores = more fatigue), Sleep Disturbance (higher scores = more disturbance during sleep), Pain (higher scores = more pain), and Social Function (higher scores = more socialization). Minimum score is 20 and maximum is 80 for each of the seven categories. |
| Cross-sectional Area | Baseline | Measures of interest include cross-sectional area. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at baseline for both limbs, measured in centimeters (cm). |
| Cross Sectional Area | 6-month | Measures of interest include cross-sectional area. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at 6 months for both limbs, measured in centimeters (cm). |
| Width | Baseline | Measures of interest include width of tendon. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at baseline for both limbs, measured in centimeters (cm). |
| Degree of Thickening | Baseline | Measures of interest include degree of thickening of tendon. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at baseline for both limbs, measured in centimeters (cm). |
| Relative Neovascularity | Baseline | Measures of interest include relative neovascularity. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at baseline for both limbs. The relative level of neovascularization will be rated from grade 0: no visible vessels, grade 1: 1 to 2 vessels within the region of interest, grade 2: 3 to 5 vessels within the region of interest (ROI), or grade 3: vessel's in up to 30% of the ROI. |
| Elastography | Baseline | Measures of interest include elastography. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at baseline for both limbs. |
| Heel Raises-Quantitative Function in Heel Raises to Fatigue. | Baseline | Quantitative function in heel raises to fatigue on both limbs. |
| Hops | Baseline | Quantitative function in ankle strength, we will also ask the participants to complete 20 hops and rate their pain using the Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS). The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a pain assessment tool designed specifically for military personnel and veterans Rating scale from 0-10. Higher scores equal worse outcomes. |
| Ankle Range of Motion (ROM) | Baseline | Quantitative function in range of motion (ROM). |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
A total of 48 participants consented to be in the study. However, 2 participants were withdrawn prior to randomization due to failing formal screening criteria. This left 46 participants to be randomized into a study arm assignment.
Pre-assignment details
Formal Screening (prior to study arm randomization): Post-consent, secondary exclusion of pregnancy will be determined by an hCG urine pregnancy test for females of child-bearing age and capacity. Additionally, all participants will be screened for insertional AT as the primary clinical diagnosis with a 3 part test. If the insertional AT component is identified as the primary source of Achilles pain, we formally withdrew the participants from the study prior to randomization.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only In Part 1, the physical therapy only arm requires 8 visits. The participants will complete 2 check-in visits each week (remote or in person), for three weeks. Follow-up data will be collected at 6 weeks (virtual or in-person) and at 3 months (in-person). All participants may complete a PT program as standard of care (SOC) treatment addressing individual strength, mobility, and flexibility deficits in both proximal (e.g. spine and hip girdle) along with distal (thigh, leg, and foot/ankle) muscle groups. The provider may also use other modalities to address distal issues. To standardize the loading program, all participants will be given an at-home exercise program designed by Dr. Karin Sibernagel for progressive Achilles tendon loading. The participants will also follow the University of Delaware Return to Sport protocol for return to running. This will be completed alongside the standard of care PT participants will be receiving. | 11 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) The physical therapy + photobiomodulation therapy arm will receive PBMT twice a week, for three weeks, in addition to the PT treatment described above.
A member of the study team will measure the treatment area according to a standard protocol (Appendix N PBM Dose Calculations), to calculate and determine the treatment time, approximately 5-20 minutes. PBMT will be delivered at 25W.
Physical Therapy: All participants may complete a PT program as standard of care (SOC) treatment addressing individual strength, mobility, and flexibility deficits in both proximal (e.g. spine and hip girdle) along with distal (thigh, leg, and foot/ankle) muscle groups. The provider may also use other modalities to address distal issues. To standardize the loading program, all participants will be given an at-home exercise program designed by Dr. Karin Sibernagel for progressive Achilles tendon loading. The participants will also follow the University of Delaware Return to Sport protocol for return to running. This will be completed alongside the standard of care PT participants will be receiving.
Photobiomodulation Therapy: PBMT is delivered with the LightForce® XPi 25W device through the Smart Hand Piece technology. The therapy is transmitted with a rolling glass massage ball at 10 Joules/cm\^2 that is applied in a serpentine manner over the site of injury. | 11 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) The physical therapy + shockwave therapy arm will receive SWT once a week for three weeks in addition to the PT treatment.
In total, participants will receive one SWT treatment each week (in person) and complete two check-ins each week (remote or in person), for three weeks. The SWT will take approximately 5-20 minutes.
Shockwave Therapy: A medical provider will conduct SWT on study participants using the OrthoPlus Ultra 100. This Extracorporeal Pressure Activation Treatment device will be used at a radial shockwave of 3000 counts treatment settings of 15 Hz minimum 2 bars with a focus applicator head at mid-portion of Achilles using clinical focusing technique, and 3000 counts at 15 Hz minimum 2.5 bars using broad oscillator to myotendinous region and over symptomatic areas of gastrocnemius and soleus, treatment will be applied distally to proximally to facilitate lymphatic return adjusting treatment air pressure and amount of force applied by applicator head by patient comfort. The maximum setting for each treatment applicator will be 4 bars of air pressure, and the first 500 counts using each applicator will be applied at 1.5 bars to help desensitize the tissue prior to increasing energy settings. The settings used for each participant will be recorded and followed in a similar approach to treatment. | 12 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT The PT + SWT + PBMT arm will receive both SWT and PBMT treatments in addition to PT treatment described. Participants will receive PBMT twice a week and SWT once a week, for three weeks. The SWT visit may be combined with a PBMT visit in the same week. Up to two times each week after a treatment visit (for three weeks), a team member will check-in with the participants to ensure physical therapy exercise adherence, and response to treatment. During the second check-in of the week, the team member will also ensure the participant is keeping their activity/medication/pain log; the team member will also deliver the DVPRS with supplemental questions. When/if needed, these check-ins may occur virtually. (See Appendix F for check-in data collection CRF).
In Part 1, the PT+ SWT + PBMT treatment arm requires 8 visits: 3 for PBMT alone with check- ins (in person), 3 for PBMT & SWT with check-ins (in person), 6-week follow-up (virtual or in-person), and 3-month follow-up (in person). | 12 |
| Total | 46 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Physical Therapy (PT) Only | PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | PT + SWT and PBMT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 11 Participants | 11 Participants | 12 Participants | 12 Participants | 46 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race/Ethnicity American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race/Ethnicity Asian or Pacific Islander | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race/Ethnicity Black or African American (not Hispanic) | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race/Ethnicity Hispanic | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 4 Participants | 3 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race/Ethnicity Other | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race/Ethnicity White (not Hispanic | 6 Participants | 7 Participants | 5 Participants | 5 Participants | 23 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 11 participants | 11 participants | 12 participants | 12 participants | 46 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 3 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 9 Participants | 9 Participants | 8 Participants | 9 Participants | 35 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 11 | 0 / 10 | 0 / 12 | 0 / 12 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 8 / 11 | 8 / 10 | 9 / 12 | 7 / 12 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 4 / 11 | 2 / 10 | 2 / 12 | 0 / 12 |
Outcome results
Ankle Range of Motion (ROM)
Quantitative function in range of motion (ROM)
Time frame: 12-week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Ankle Range of Motion (ROM) | 14.89 degrees | Standard Deviation 3.14 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Ankle Range of Motion (ROM) | 13.80 degrees | Standard Deviation 6.29 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Ankle Range of Motion (ROM) | 10.60 degrees | Standard Deviation 3.58 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Ankle Range of Motion (ROM) | 10.80 degrees | Standard Deviation 3.37 |
Ankle Range of Motion (ROM)
Quantitative function in range of motion (ROM).
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Ankle Range of Motion (ROM) | 12.18 degrees | Standard Deviation 4.39 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Ankle Range of Motion (ROM) | 12.40 degrees | Standard Deviation 4.18 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Ankle Range of Motion (ROM) | 12.67 degrees | Standard Deviation 9.74 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Ankle Range of Motion (ROM) | 12.18 degrees | Standard Deviation 4.04 |
Ankle Range of Motion (ROM)
Quantitative function in range of motion (ROM)
Time frame: 6 Months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Ankle Range of Motion (ROM) | 15.75 degrees | Standard Deviation 7.64 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Ankle Range of Motion (ROM) | 10.22 degrees | Standard Deviation 3.46 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Ankle Range of Motion (ROM) | 10.67 degrees | Standard Deviation 4.32 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Ankle Range of Motion (ROM) | 11.60 degrees | Standard Deviation 5.12 |
Cross-sectional Area
Measures of interest include cross-sectional area. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at baseline for both limbs, measured in centimeters (cm).
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Cross-sectional Area | 0.64 cm | Standard Deviation 0.11 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Cross-sectional Area | 0.65 cm | Standard Deviation 0.15 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Cross-sectional Area | 0.69 cm | Standard Deviation 0.29 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Cross-sectional Area | 0.85 cm | Standard Deviation 0.27 |
Cross-sectional Area
Measures of interest include cross-sectional area. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at 12 weeks for both limbs, measured in centimeters (cm).
Time frame: 12-week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Cross-sectional Area | 0.67 cm | Standard Deviation 0.42 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Cross-sectional Area | 0.71 cm | Standard Deviation 0.21 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Cross-sectional Area | 0.62 cm | Standard Deviation 0.22 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Cross-sectional Area | 1.50 cm | Standard Deviation 1.39 |
Cross Sectional Area
Measures of interest include cross-sectional area. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at 6 months for both limbs, measured in centimeters (cm).
Time frame: 6-month
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Cross Sectional Area | 0.76 cm | Standard Deviation 0.38 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Cross Sectional Area | 0.74 cm | Standard Deviation 0.13 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Cross Sectional Area | 0.70 cm | Standard Deviation 0.33 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Cross Sectional Area | 0.80 cm | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)
The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a pain assessment tool designed specifically for military personnel and veterans Rating scale from 0-10. Higher scores equal worse outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) | 4.27 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.66 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) | 3.50 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.87 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) | 5.58 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.29 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) | 3.27 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.96 |
Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)
The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a pain assessment tool designed specifically for military personnel and veterans Rating scale from 0-10. Higher scores equal worse outcomes.
Time frame: 6-week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) | 2.33 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.83 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) | 2.22 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.93 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) | 3.64 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.84 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) | 1.80 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.72 |
Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)
The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a pain assessment tool designed specifically for military personnel and veterans Rating scale from 0-10. Higher scores equal worse outcomes.
Time frame: 6-month
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) | 1.88 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) | 1.67 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) | 2.11 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.47 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) | 2.60 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.65 |
Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)
The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a pain assessment tool designed specifically for military personnel and veterans Rating scale from 0-10. Higher scores equal worse outcomes.
Time frame: 12-week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) | 1.89 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.91 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) | 2.30 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.65 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) | 2.80 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.04 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) | 2.00 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.84 |
Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)
The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a pain assessment tool designed specifically for military personnel and veterans Rating scale from 0-10. Higher scores equal worse outcomes.
Time frame: 3-week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) | 2.67 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.33 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) | 2.50 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) | 4.17 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.15 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) | 2.60 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
Degree of Thickening
Measures of interest include degree of thickening of tendon. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at 6 months for both limbs, measured in centimeters (cm).
Time frame: 6-month
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Degree of Thickening | 1.45 cm | Standard Deviation 0.24 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Degree of Thickening | 1.53 cm | Standard Deviation 0.17 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Degree of Thickening | 1.37 cm | Standard Deviation 0.13 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Degree of Thickening | 1.55 cm | Standard Deviation 0.25 |
Degree of Thickening
Measures of interest include degree of thickening of tendon. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at baseline for both limbs, measured in centimeters (cm).
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Degree of Thickening | 1.4 cm | Standard Deviation 0.18 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Degree of Thickening | 1.52 cm | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Degree of Thickening | 1.45 cm | Standard Deviation 0.16 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Degree of Thickening | 1.49 cm | Standard Deviation 0.24 |
Degree of Thickening
Measures of interest include degree of thickening of tendon. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at 12 weeks for both limbs, measured in centimeters (cm).
Time frame: 12-week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Degree of Thickening | 1.43 cm | Standard Deviation 0.22 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Degree of Thickening | 1.37 cm | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Degree of Thickening | 1.46 cm | Standard Deviation 0.23 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Degree of Thickening | 1.49 cm | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
Elastography
Measures of interest include elastography. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at 12 weeks for both limbs.
Time frame: 12-week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Elastography | 6.70 m/s | Standard Deviation 0.66 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Elastography | 6.63 m/s | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Elastography | 6.40 m/s | Standard Deviation 1.04 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Elastography | 6.02 m/s | Standard Deviation 0.56 |
Elastography
Measures of interest include elastography. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at baseline for both limbs.
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Elastography | 6.64 m/s | Standard Deviation 0.72 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Elastography | 7.37 m/s | Standard Deviation 0.75 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Elastography | 6.17 m/s | Standard Deviation 0.94 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Elastography | 6.57 m/s | Standard Deviation 0.54 |
Elastography
Measures of interest include elastography. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at 6 months for both limbs.
Time frame: 6 Months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Elastography | 6.63 m/s | Standard Deviation 0.79 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Elastography | 6.76 m/s | Standard Deviation 0.95 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Elastography | 6.34 m/s | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Elastography | 6.89 m/s | Standard Deviation 0.72 |
Heel Raises-Quantitative Function in Heel Raises to Fatigue.
Quantitative function in heel raises to fatigue on both limbs.
Time frame: 6 Months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Heel Raises-Quantitative Function in Heel Raises to Fatigue. | 22.13 heel raises | Standard Deviation 5.56 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Heel Raises-Quantitative Function in Heel Raises to Fatigue. | 21.44 heel raises | Standard Deviation 6.96 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Heel Raises-Quantitative Function in Heel Raises to Fatigue. | 20.22 heel raises | Standard Deviation 4.13 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Heel Raises-Quantitative Function in Heel Raises to Fatigue. | 21.90 heel raises | Standard Deviation 10.52 |
Heel Raises-Quantitative Function in Heel Raises to Fatigue.
Quantitative function in heel raises to fatigue on both limbs.
Time frame: 12-week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Heel Raises-Quantitative Function in Heel Raises to Fatigue. | 28 heel raises | Standard Deviation 10.12 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Heel Raises-Quantitative Function in Heel Raises to Fatigue. | 20.60 heel raises | Standard Deviation 7.63 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Heel Raises-Quantitative Function in Heel Raises to Fatigue. | 21.80 heel raises | Standard Deviation 8.45 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Heel Raises-Quantitative Function in Heel Raises to Fatigue. | 21.90 heel raises | Standard Deviation 6.09 |
Heel Raises-Quantitative Function in Heel Raises to Fatigue.
Quantitative function in heel raises to fatigue on both limbs.
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Heel Raises-Quantitative Function in Heel Raises to Fatigue. | 16.5 heel raises | Standard Deviation 8.62 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Heel Raises-Quantitative Function in Heel Raises to Fatigue. | 15.50 heel raises | Standard Deviation 9.09 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Heel Raises-Quantitative Function in Heel Raises to Fatigue. | 12.67 heel raises | Standard Deviation 7.63 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Heel Raises-Quantitative Function in Heel Raises to Fatigue. | 15.73 heel raises | Standard Deviation 7.86 |
Hops
Quantitative function in ankle strength, we will also ask the participants to complete 20 hops and rate their pain using the Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS). The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a pain assessment tool designed specifically for military personnel and veterans Rating scale from 0-10. Higher scores equal worse outcomes.
Time frame: 6 Months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Hops | .88 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.69 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Hops | 2.38 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.91 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Hops | 3.00 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.11 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Hops | 2.10 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.88 |
Hops
Quantitative function in ankle strength, we will also ask the participants to complete 20 hops and rate their pain using the Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS). The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a pain assessment tool designed specifically for military personnel and veterans Rating scale from 0-10. Higher scores equal worse outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Hops | 3.18 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.21 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Hops | 3.20 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.71 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Hops | 4.92 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.15 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Hops | 2.70 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.85 |
Hops
Quantitative function in ankle strength, we will also ask the participants to complete 20 hops and rate their pain using the Defense and Veteran's Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS). The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a pain assessment tool designed specifically for military personnel and veterans Rating scale from 0-10. Higher scores equal worse outcomes.
Time frame: 12-week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Hops | .44 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.68 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Hops | 2.40 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.85 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Hops | 3.20 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.44 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Hops | 1.90 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.45 |
Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)
The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) is a questionnaire used to assess a person's ability to perform everyday activities involving the lower limbs. It consists of 20 questions, each scored from 0 to 4, with a minimum score of 0 and maximum total score of 80. Key Points: Higher scores indicate better lower extremity function. Lower scores suggest greater disability or difficulty in movement.
Time frame: 3-week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) | 51.33 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.76 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) | 60.90 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) | 47.75 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.58 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) | 57.70 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.6 |
Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)
The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) is a questionnaire used to assess a person's ability to perform everyday activities involving the lower limbs. It consists of 20 questions, each scored from 0 to 4, with a minimum score of 0 and maximum total score of 80. Key Points: Higher scores indicate better lower extremity function. Lower scores suggest greater disability or difficulty in movement.
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) | 47.91 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.47 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) | 50.10 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.64 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) | 46.75 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.87 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) | 59.55 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.9 |
Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)
The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) is a questionnaire used to assess a person's ability to perform everyday activities involving the lower limbs. It consists of 20 questions, each scored from 0 to 4, with a minimum score of 0 and maximum total score of 80. Key Points: Higher scores indicate better lower extremity function. Lower scores suggest greater disability or difficulty in movement.
Time frame: 6-week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) | 60.78 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.6 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) | 62.11 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.71 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) | 55.27 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.43 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) | 64.30 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.68 |
Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)
The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) is a questionnaire used to assess a person's ability to perform everyday activities involving the lower limbs. It consists of 20 questions, each scored from 0 to 4, with a minimum score of 0 and maximum total score of 80. Key Points: Higher scores indicate better lower extremity function. Lower scores suggest greater disability or difficulty in movement.
Time frame: 12-week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) | 65.11 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.47 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) | 65.30 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.3 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) | 54.10 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.18 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) | 60.40 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.58 |
Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)
The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) is a questionnaire used to assess a person's ability to perform everyday activities involving the lower limbs. It consists of 20 questions, each scored from 0 to 4, with a minimum score of 0 and maximum total score of 80. Key Points: Higher scores indicate better lower extremity function. Lower scores suggest greater disability or difficulty in movement.
Time frame: 6-month
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) | 62.38 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.09 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) | 64.89 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.14 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) | 62.33 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.53 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) | 67.10 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.94 |
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) has seven categories: Physical Function (higher scores = better function), Anxiety (higher scores = more anxiety), Depression (higher scores = more depression), Fatigue (higher scores = more fatigue), Sleep Disturbance (higher scores = more disturbance during sleep), Pain (higher scores = more pain), and Social Function (higher scores = more socialization). Minimum score is 20 and maximum is 80 for each of the seven categories.
Time frame: 6-week
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Anxiety | 43.30 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.49 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Physical Function | 46.18 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.97 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Sleep Disturbance | 49.27 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.89 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Depression | 44.24 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.82 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Social Function | 54.44 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.12 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Fatigue | 49.86 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.73 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Pain | 51.57 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.3 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Physical Function | 48.34 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.73 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Pain | 50.84 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.6 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Fatigue | 42.13 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.75 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Sleep Disturbance | 53.06 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.19 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Social Function | 53.00 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.33 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Depression | 44.07 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.75 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Anxiety | 43.44 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.08 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Pain | 55.26 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.51 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Anxiety | 53.60 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.99 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Depression | 52.16 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.81 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Fatigue | 49.05 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.77 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Sleep Disturbance | 49.96 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.85 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Physical Function | 46.33 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.8 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Social Function | 55.08 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.09 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Fatigue | 47.89 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.72 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Social Function | 54.02 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.26 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Physical Function | 46.73 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.17 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Depression | 43.92 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.54 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Anxiety | 44.52 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.11 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Sleep Disturbance | 50.45 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.6 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Pain | 51.21 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.18 |
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) has seven categories: Physical Function (higher scores = better function), Anxiety (higher scores = more anxiety), Depression (higher scores = more depression), Fatigue (higher scores = more fatigue), Sleep Disturbance (higher scores = more disturbance during sleep), Pain (higher scores = more pain), and Social Function (higher scores = more socialization). Minimum score is 20 and maximum is 80 for each of the seven categories.
Time frame: 3-week
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Anxiety | 47.54 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.76 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Physical Function | 43.02 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.78 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Sleep Disturbance | 50.58 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.45 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Depression | 45.39 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.5 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Social Function | 50.85 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.03 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Fatigue | 48.90 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.05 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Pain | 56.80 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.68 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Physical Function | 49.35 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.29 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Pain | 50.93 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.12 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Fatigue | 43.08 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.13 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Sleep Disturbance | 50.19 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.25 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Social Function | 54.56 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.17 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Depression | 43.12 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.36 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Anxiety | 47.99 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.38 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Pain | 55.35 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.37 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Anxiety | 52.88 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.25 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Depression | 51.37 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.63 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Fatigue | 49.92 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.15 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Sleep Disturbance | 52.48 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.23 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Physical Function | 43.05 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.02 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Social Function | 50.93 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.93 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Fatigue | 43.89 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.29 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Social Function | 56.12 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.16 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Physical Function | 48.36 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.94 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Depression | 43.59 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.63 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Anxiety | 43.38 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.22 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Sleep Disturbance | 47.92 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.77 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Pain | 53 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.47 |
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) has seven categories: Physical Function (higher scores = better function), Anxiety (higher scores = more anxiety), Depression (higher scores = more depression), Fatigue (higher scores = more fatigue), Sleep Disturbance (higher scores = more disturbance during sleep), Pain (higher scores = more pain), and Social Function (higher scores = more socialization). Minimum score is 20 and maximum is 80 for each of the seven categories.
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Anxiety | 46.96 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.02 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Physical Function | 40.13 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.36 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Sleep Disturbance | 52.35 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.67 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Depression | 44.55 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.09 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Social Function | 52.75 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.96 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Fatigue | 53.49 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.56 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Pain | 57.86 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.32 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Physical Function | 46.52 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.83 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Pain | 53.65 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.74 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Fatigue | 42.73 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.92 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Sleep Disturbance | 50.59 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.91 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Social Function | 53.27 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.64 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Depression | 41 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Anxiety | 49.20 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.29 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Pain | 59.46 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.31 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Anxiety | 53.81 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.55 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Depression | 49.63 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.19 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Fatigue | 49.33 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.54 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Sleep Disturbance | 54.44 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Physical Function | 40.36 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.19 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Social Function | 50.20 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.06 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Fatigue | 43.95 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.78 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Social Function | 54.99 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.67 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Physical Function | 44.32 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.85 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Depression | 43.88 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.82 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Anxiety | 43.92 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.99 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Sleep Disturbance | 48.16 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.55 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Pain | 56.69 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.77 |
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) has seven categories: Physical Function (higher scores = better function), Anxiety (higher scores = more anxiety), Depression (higher scores = more depression), Fatigue (higher scores = more fatigue), Sleep Disturbance (higher scores = more disturbance during sleep), Pain (higher scores = more pain), and Social Function (higher scores = more socialization). Minimum score is 20 and maximum is 80 for each of the seven categories.
Time frame: 6-month
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Anxiety | 42.94 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.98 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Physical Function | 49.79 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.1 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Sleep Disturbance | 50.48 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.53 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Depression | 43.24 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.92 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Social Function | 53.86 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.15 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Fatigue | 44.89 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.97 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Pain | 52.46 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.85 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Physical Function | 48.64 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.43 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Pain | 50.30 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.43 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Fatigue | 44.87 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.47 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Sleep Disturbance | 50.90 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.77 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Social Function | 55.78 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.69 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Depression | 44.07 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.75 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Anxiety | 45.47 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.31 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Pain | 52.63 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.36 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Anxiety | 55.58 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.81 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Depression | 49.96 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.45 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Fatigue | 46.17 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.26 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Sleep Disturbance | 52.40 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.16 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Physical Function | 46.46 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.1 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Social Function | 52.27 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.65 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Fatigue | 40.42 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.9 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Social Function | 59.82 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.58 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Physical Function | 50.98 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.56 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Depression | 44.63 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.85 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Anxiety | 43.95 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.62 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Sleep Disturbance | 50.49 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.6 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Pain | 48.11 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.24 |
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) has seven categories: Physical Function (higher scores = better function), Anxiety (higher scores = more anxiety), Depression (higher scores = more depression), Fatigue (higher scores = more fatigue), Sleep Disturbance (higher scores = more disturbance during sleep), Pain (higher scores = more pain), and Social Function (higher scores = more socialization). Minimum score is 20 and maximum is 80 for each of the seven categories.
Time frame: 12-week
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Anxiety | 43.30 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.49 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Physical Function | 49.71 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.41 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Sleep Disturbance | 53.71 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.37 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Depression | 43.94 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.33 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Social Function | 54.26 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.75 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Fatigue | 47.43 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.48 |
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Pain | 48.56 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.55 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Physical Function | 49.70 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.32 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Pain | 51.44 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.99 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Fatigue | 46.16 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.14 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Sleep Disturbance | 50.51 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.36 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Social Function | 55.00 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.17 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Depression | 45.54 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.95 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Anxiety | 46.59 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.26 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Pain | 53.72 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.91 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Anxiety | 52.07 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.44 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Depression | 50.04 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.76 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Fatigue | 50.91 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.42 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Sleep Disturbance | 54.57 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.82 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Physical Function | 45.27 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.3 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Social Function | 52.36 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.85 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Fatigue | 46.74 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.28 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Social Function | 60.40 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.98 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Physical Function | 48.70 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.81 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Depression | 44.27 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.53 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Anxiety | 43.18 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.49 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Sleep Disturbance | 51.71 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.33 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | Pain | 50.46 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.04 |
Relative Neovascularity
Measures of interest include relative neovascularity. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at 12 weeks for both limbs. The relative level of neovascularization will be rated from grade 0: no visible vessels, grade 1: 1 to 2 vessels within the region of interest, grade 2: 3 to 5 vessels within the region of interest (ROI), or grade 3: vessel's in up to 30% of the ROI.
Time frame: 12-week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Relative Neovascularity | .56 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.07 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Relative Neovascularity | .89 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Relative Neovascularity | .60 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Relative Neovascularity | 1.10 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
Relative Neovascularity
Measures of interest include relative neovascularity. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at baseline for both limbs. The relative level of neovascularization will be rated from grade 0: no visible vessels, grade 1: 1 to 2 vessels within the region of interest, grade 2: 3 to 5 vessels within the region of interest (ROI), or grade 3: vessel's in up to 30% of the ROI.
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Relative Neovascularity | .25 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.66 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Relative Neovascularity | .67 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.94 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Relative Neovascularity | .43 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.73 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Relative Neovascularity | 1.00 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.15 |
Relative Neovascularity
Measures of interest include relative neovascularity. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at 6 months for both limbs. The relative level of neovascularization will be rated from grade 0: no visible vessels, grade 2: 3 to 5 vessels within the region of interest (ROI), grade 3: vessel's in up to 30% of the ROI
Time frame: 6-months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Relative Neovascularity | .88 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.27 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Relative Neovascularity | .56 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.83 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Relative Neovascularity | .89 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.99 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Relative Neovascularity | .60 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.92 |
University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI)
The University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) is a questionnaire designed to assess a runner's recovery from running-related injuries. Scores range from 0-36, with higher scores equaling better outcomes.
Time frame: 12-week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) | 17.89 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.95 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) | 17.30 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.4 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) | 15.50 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.99 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) | 20.80 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.07 |
University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI)
The University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) is a questionnaire designed to assess a runner's recovery from running-related injuries. Scores range from 0-36, with higher scores equaling better outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) | 9.91 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.24 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) | 12 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.88 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) | 12 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) | 12.18 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.57 |
University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI)
The University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) is a questionnaire designed to assess a runner's recovery from running-related injuries. Scores range from 0-36, with higher scores equaling better outcomes.
Time frame: 3-week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) | 15.56 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.69 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) | 14.90 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.12 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) | 13.42 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.38 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) | 14.10 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.17 |
University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI)
The University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) is a questionnaire designed to assess a runner's recovery from running-related injuries. Scores range from 0-36, with higher scores equaling better outcomes.
Time frame: 6-month
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) | 16.25 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.67 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) | 20.78 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.67 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) | 19.11 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.43 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) | 20.20 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.43 |
University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI)
The University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) is a questionnaire designed to assess a runner's recovery from running-related injuries. Scores range from 0-36, with higher scores equaling better outcomes.
Time frame: 6-week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) | 16.11 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.64 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) | 16.44 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) | 13.36 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.05 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) | 16.40 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.09 |
Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A)
The VISA-A (Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles) is a questionnaire designed to assess the severity of Achilles tendinopathy. It consists of eight questions that evaluate pain, function in daily life, and sports activities. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100, with lower scores indicating more severe symptoms and limitations
Time frame: 3-week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A) | 56.33 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.86 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A) | 63.90 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.91 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A) | 50.17 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.92 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A) | 58.30 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.25 |
Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A)
The VISA-A (Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles) is a questionnaire designed to assess the severity of Achilles tendinopathy. It consists of eight questions that evaluate pain, function in daily life, and sports activities. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100, with lower scores indicating more severe symptoms and limitations
Time frame: 6-month
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A) | 67.50 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.51 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A) | 76.11 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.37 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A) | 61.22 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.21 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A) | 69 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.99 |
Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A)
The VISA-A (Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles) is a questionnaire designed to assess the severity of Achilles tendinopathy. It consists of eight questions that evaluate pain, function in daily life, and sports activities. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100, with lower scores indicating more severe symptoms and limitations
Time frame: 12-week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A) | 69.33 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.67 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A) | 61.10 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.63 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A) | 58.10 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.21 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A) | 68.40 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.9 |
Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A)
The VISA-A (Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles) is a questionnaire designed to assess the severity of Achilles tendinopathy. It consists of eight questions that evaluate pain, function in daily life, and sports activities. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100, with lower scores indicating more severe symptoms and limitations.
Time frame: 6-week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A) | 61.11 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.8 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A) | 64 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.75 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A) | 54.09 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.35 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A) | 63.20 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.59 |
Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A)
The VISA-A (Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles) is a questionnaire designed to assess the severity of Achilles tendinopathy. It consists of eight questions that evaluate pain, function in daily life, and sports activities. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100, with lower scores indicating more severe symptoms and limitations
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A) | 37.55 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.56 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A) | 43.82 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.88 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A) | 36.08 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.55 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A) | 46.92 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.17 |
Width
Measures of interest include width of tendon. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at 6 months for both limbs, measured in centimeters (cm).
Time frame: 6-month
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Width | .63 cm | Standard Deviation 0.19 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Width | .65 cm | Standard Deviation 0.12 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Width | .59 cm | Standard Deviation 0.14 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Width | .68 cm | Standard Deviation 0.14 |
Width
Measures of interest include width of tendon. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at 12 weeks for both limbs, measured in centimeters (cm).
Time frame: 12-week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Width | .66 cm | Standard Deviation 0.21 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Width | .56 cm | Standard Deviation 0.21 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Width | .65 cm | Standard Deviation 0.25 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Width | .66 cm | Standard Deviation 0.14 |
Width
Measures of interest include width of tendon. A study team member will assess ultrasound measures at baseline for both limbs, measured in centimeters (cm).
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy (PT) Only | Width | .563 cm | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
| PT + Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) | Width | .59 cm | Standard Deviation 0.13 |
| PT + Shockwave Therapy (SWT) | Width | .59 cm | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
| PT + SWT and PBMT | Width | .69 cm | Standard Deviation 0.16 |