Knee Disease
Conditions
Brief summary
Primary objective: To compare medial uni compartimental knee arthroplasty between patients who had a limit factor prior to the surgery ans patients who fill thé historical criteria. Secondary objectives 1 to compare survival of medial UKA between patients with one limit factor and those with multiple limits. 2\. To identify the prognosis factors of failure in medial UKA in our center during the time of our analysis (2009-2015)
Detailed description
7 year follow up survival if no amputation or no removal of UKA for TKA
Interventions
PROCEDUREUnicompartmental knee arthroplasty
medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Sponsors
Central Hospital, Nancy, France
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
\- medial UKA implanted between 2009 and 2015 at the CCEG
Exclusion criteria
* no other UKA * lost to follow up * patient refuses
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Survival of medial UKA | 7 years | UKA changed or replaced by TKA |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| to compare UKA survival if multiple limit indication | 7 years | UKA changed or replaced by TKA |
| to identify prognostic factors of re operation of patients with a medial UKA implanted between 2009 and 2015 at the CCEG | 7 years | ACL, flessum, HKA, weight |
Countries
France
Contacts
Primary ContactGrégoire Vaz
Backup ContactAndrea Fernandez, Dr
Outcome results
None listed