Skip to content

Trial With Two New Tooth-colored Restorative Materials in Class I/II Cavities

Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial (RCT) of the New Tooth-colored Restorative Material 'Cention Forte' (Ivoclar Vivadent) vs. 'Equia Forte HT' (GC) in Class-I/II Cavities

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05748327
Enrollment
58
Registered
2023-02-28
Start date
2022-11-22
Completion date
2028-04-01
Last updated
2024-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Caries, Defective Restorations

Brief summary

This is a randomized-controlled clinical trial to investigate the success rate of two new tooth-colored restorative materials in class I and II cavities over 5 years according to FDI criteria scores (1, 2 and 3).

Detailed description

The primary outcome of the study is the SUCCESS RATE of restorations placed with both filling materials in class I and II cavities after 5 years of clinical service. A failure which leads to repair or replacement of the restoration can have esthetic (marginal staining, loss of anatomical form), functional (i.e. fracture of restoration, loss of retention) or biological reasons (i.e. secondary caries). A restoration is defined as a failure (no success) as soon as at least one FDI criterion is scored as 4 or 5.

Interventions

DEVICEAlcasite restorative material

Cavity preparation, pulp protection (if necessary), placing matrix/ interdental wedge (if necessary), conditioning with primer, mixing alcasite capsula, place restoration, polymerizing and finishing

DEVICEBulk fill glass hybrid restorative material

Cavity preparation, pulp protection (if necessary), placing matrix/ interdental wedge (if necessary), mixing bulk fill glass hybrid capsula, conditioning, place restoration, apply coating, polymerizing and finishing

Sponsors

KU Leuven
CollaboratorOTHER
Ivoclar Vivadent AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Split-Mouth Design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject's age between 18 and 65 years old * Class I and Class II (with a cavity margin 1-1.5 mm from the cusp tip) (caries treatment, removal of existing defective amalgam/composite restorations), on premolars/molars * Vital teeth * 2 restorations per patient: both cavities should have comparable size and dimensions * Presence of neighbour tooth and antagonist (molars with no neighbour tooth at the distal side can also be included) * Low to moderate caries rate/normal periodontal status with good home care

Exclusion criteria

* Hospitalized and medically compromised patients (medical history may not compromise the outcome of the results) * Pulp exposure or signs of pulpal infection * No signs of pulpitis or hypersensitivity (Visual analog scale \< 3 on biting and temperature sensitivity) * History of allergy to glass ionomer, acrylate/methacrylate monomers * Pregnancy * Chronic disease with oral manifestations or primary oral pathology * Bad oral hygiene * High caries rate or periodontal problems * Absence of antagonists * Absence of adjacent teeth (except last molar in the row with no neighbour tooth at the distal side)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success Rate5 yearsassessed following FDI criteria on a scale from 1 very good to 5 unacceptable: e.g. post-operative hypersensitivity, surface lustre, staining, fracture of material, retention, occlusal contour and wear, and colour match of restorations (Success: Scores equal to/above 3)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success Rate6 months to 3 yearsassessed following FDI criteria on a scale from 1 very good to 5 unacceptable: e.g. post-operative hypersensitivity, surface lustre, staining, fracture of material, retention, occlusal contour and wear, and colour match of restorations (Success: Scores equal to/above 3)
Survival Rate6 months to 5 yearsassessed following FDI criteria on a scale from 1 very good to 5 unacceptable: e.g. post-operative hypersensitivity, surface lustre, staining, fracture of material, retention, occlusal contour and wear, and colour match of restorations (Survival: Score equal to/above 4)
Quality criteria (Clinical performance)6 months to 5 yearsassessed following FDI criteria on a scale from 1 very good to 5 unacceptable: e.g. post-operative hypersensitivity, surface lustre, staining, fracture of material, retention, occlusal contour and wear, and colour match of restorations

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026