Skip to content

Immediate Versus Optional Delayed Surgical Repair for Treatment of Acute ACL Injuries

Comparison of Immediate Versus Optional Delayed Surgical Repair for Treatment of Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Through a Parallel, Multicentric, Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05747079
Acronym
IODA
Enrollment
280
Registered
2023-02-28
Start date
2023-03-02
Completion date
2028-03-02
Last updated
2024-06-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ACL Injury

Keywords

ACL, RCT, Conservative treatment, ACL reconstruction

Brief summary

Currently, most patients with an anterior cruciate ligament injury undergo surgery. There is a general belief that surgical reconstruction is necessary to safely return to sports and to prevent early knee osteoarthritis or additional meniscus injuries. But there is insufficient scientific evidence to support this belief. Moreover, several studies show that surgical reconstruction of the cruciate ligament does not guarantee successful return to sports or the prevention of osteoarthritis and secondary meniscus injuries. Therefore, immediate surgery after an anterior cruciate ligament injury is questioned. So far, only two RCTs (KANON study and COMPARE study) have assessed this, and they could not show that immediate reconstruction is an added value (in terms of symptoms, knee function, activity level, osteoarthritis or additional meniscal injuries) compared to a conservative approach consisting of rehabilitation and late surgery for persistent knee instability. Therefore, this additional multicenter RCT, aims to 1) verify these results and 2) to identify predictors that predict which patients in the conservative group will not require late surgery. This has not been investigated to date. It is suspected that factors such as symptoms, strength, findings on the MRI scan and psychological factors may play a role in whether or not a patient will be able to successfully rehabilitate without surgical repair. This information is invaluable to physicians because it allows them to decide which treatment is best for the patient.

Interventions

OTHERRehabilitation

All patients complete rehabilitation under supervision of their own physiotherapist. The investigators will provide some guidelines and criteria, but it is the physiotherapist's choice how to implement these guidelines in clinical practice.

If a patient complains about persistent symptomatic instability of the knee or the inability to progress in rehabilitation, delayed surgery can be considered. ACL insufficiency induced instability in combination with a positive pivot shift and an additional MRI are needed to confirm the cause of instability. This surgery will not be performed within the first 12 weeks after the ACL injury.

No guidelines on type of ACL reconstruction will be imposed to keep the trial pragmatic. The decision of graft type and surgery technique is a clinical decision made by the orthopaedic surgeons of the participating centra. This surgery will be performed within 12 weeks after the ACL injury.

Sponsors

Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Jessa Ziekenhuis Hasselt
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege
CollaboratorOTHER
Clinique Saint-Luc Bouge
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University Hospital Brussel
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Rotational trauma to a knee that had no previous serious injury and for which medical advice was sought within 4 weeks after the injury. * Medical diagnosis of ACL insufficiency including MRI (both partial and complete ruptures) * Minimum of 16 years

Exclusion criteria

* Participant has a history of a previous ACL injury or knee surgery to the index knee * Indication for acute surgery because of related injuries to the knee * Female who is pregnant or plans to become pregnant in the first 4 months of the trial. Since MRI assessment cannot be performed.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical effectiveness (long-term)12 months post-injuryKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Subscale Quality of Life (score between 0-100, higher scores mean better outcome)
Clinical effectiveness (short-term)7 months post-injuryKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Subscale Quality of Life (score between 0-100, higher scores mean better outcome)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prediction analysis to identify patient-specific factors that predict whether (or not) a patient will require delayed surgery36 months post-injuryDependent variable = whether or not delayed surgery is performed (binary event) Independent variables (candidate predictors): * Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Subscale Quality of Life at baseline * MRI findings at baseline scored with the modified ACLOAS (Anterior Cruciate Ligament OsteoArthritis Score) * Degree of hemarthrosis determined by MRI at baseline * Expectations regarding the effectiveness of physical therapy at baseline, measured with the illness perception questionnaire * Pre-injury activity level, measured with the Tegner Activity Score

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

Primary ContactAnnemie Smeets, phd
annemie.smeets@kuleuven.be+32 16 37 91 02

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026