Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Roux En-y Gastric Bypass

Can Robotic Gastric Bypass be Considered a Valid Alternative to Laparoscopy: Our Early Experience

Status

Completed

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT05746936

Enrollment

Registered

2023-02-28

Start date

2020-01-01

Completion date

2023-01-15

Last updated

2023-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anastomosis; Complications, Bypass Complication, Obesity, Morbid, Roux-en-y Anastomosis Site, Surgery-Complications

Brief summary

This study retrospectively identified 33 consecutive obese patients who underwent either laparoscopic or robotic gastric bypass procedures over a 2-year period.

Interventions

PROCEDURERoux en-Y gastric bypass

gastric bypass with jejuna-jenual anastomosis and gusto-jejunal anastomosis

Study design

Observational model

COHORT

Time perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

* Body mass index (BMI) ≥35-39 kg/m2 with one obesity- associated co-morbidity * BMI≥40kg/m2, age ≥ 18 years.

Exclusion criteria

* Re-do surgery procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
differences between the robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass	two years period	incidence of mortality and morbidity (percentage)

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026