Skip to content

Failed Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Stone Extraction: Surgical Interference

Failed Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Stone Extraction: Surgical Interference Versus Follow up on Stent.

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05746832
Enrollment
3
Registered
2023-02-28
Start date
2024-09-30
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2024-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Common Bile Duct Calculi

Brief summary

Assessment of the differences in stone size and the largest CBD diameter before and after stenting in one or two sessions. Stone clearance and complications were also determined with the ERCP, and factors associated with complete clearance were evaluated in patients with difficult CBD stones (a large \[≥ 20 mm\] or multiple \[≥ 3 sized ≥ 15 mm\] CBD stones). And also compared the outcomes with conventional procedure of open surgery.

Detailed description

Gallstones are a very common problem in developed countries. Most patients with gallstones remain asymptomatic throughout their lifetime, but 10 % - 25 % of them may develop biliary pain or complications, with an annual risk of about 2 % - 3 % for symptomatic disease and 1 % - 2 % for major complications. The development of symptomatic disease and complications is mostly related to the migration of stones into the common bile duct (CBD). Common bile duct stones (CBDSs) may be treated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or surgically during cholecystectomy. Removal of common bile duct (CBD) stones can still be difficult in patients with large or multiple stones despite an adequate sphincterotomy. Procedures such as mechanical, extracorporeal, electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy, and chemical dissolution have been introduced as effective therapeutic interventions for irretrievable CBD stones. However, these techniques have their drawbacks, are not widely available, or are still under clinical evaluation. Several studies have shown that insertion of an endoscopic biliary stent is a safe, effective, and widely available measure. An indwelling stent provides biliary drainage and fragments large stones, thereby reducing the risk of cholangitis and allowing stones to pass spontaneously or rendering them more extractable at a later procedure. Thus, this study intends to shed a light on advances in diagnosis and management in patients with biliary difficult stones.

Interventions

PROCEDUREEndoscopic stenting Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)

Assessment of the differences in stone size and the largest CBD diameter before and after stenting in one or two sessions. Stone clearance and complications were also determined with the ERCP, and factors associated with complete clearance were evaluated in patients with difficult CBD stones (a large \[≥ 20 mm\] or multiple \[≥ 3 sized ≥ 15 mm\] CBD stones). And also compared the outcomes with conventional procedure of open surgery.

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. All cases of difficult common bile duct stones leading to variable occlusion. 2. Patients fit for intervention. 3. Patients informed consent for study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Surgically unfit cases according to ASA 2. Locally advanced irresectable cases. 3. Patients refuse consent to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative morbidity and mortality.Baseline.Those are measures in percentage of patients in the study.
Time of procedure.On the day of determined procedure.This is measured in hours.
Rate of stone size reduction.Baseline.This is measured in millimeters.
Width of CBD.Baseline.This is measured in millimeters.
Degree of stone clearance and complications.Baseline.Those are determined by close monitoring of patients whether after ERCP or surgery.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blood loss during the procedure.Baseline.This is measured in milliliters.
Postoperative wound infection.Baseline.This is measured in percentage of patients in the study.
Postoperative hospital stay.Baseline.This is measured in days.
Postoperative hemorrhage.Baseline.This is measured in milliliters.
Postoperative 30 day mortality rate.Baseline.This is measured in percentage of patients in the study.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactZyad Osama Harith, resident
zyadosama200000@gmail.com01149863511
Backup ContactMostafa Mahmoud Mohammed Sayed, ass prof
mostafa.sayed@aun.edu.eg+201271207839

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026