Skip to content

Addressing Disparities in Food Access Among Young Children in Louisiana: A Farm to ECE Approach

Addressing Disparities in Food Access Among Young Children in Louisiana: A Farm to ECE Approach

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05745376
Acronym
FarmtoECE
Enrollment
228
Registered
2023-02-27
Start date
2023-09-01
Completion date
2024-07-31
Last updated
2024-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Food Insecurity, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Nutrition, Healthy

Brief summary

The goal of this pilot project is to increase access to healthy food, improve diets, and reduce food insecurity and, in turn, reduce health disparities among low-income, minority children under the age of five attending early childcare centers. Specific aims are to: 1) examine the feasibility of a six-month Farm to ECE intervention and 2) collect preliminary data to evaluate the efficacy of the program to 2.1) improve the ECE nutrition environment from baseline to follow-up; 2.2) increase access to local fruits and vegetables among children at ECEs from baseline to follow-up; and 2.3) increase parent knowledge and use of community food resources. The investigators will use this preliminary data to develop a larger scale project to test intervention efficacy.

Detailed description

The pilot study will take place at four centers within a network of Catholic Charities Early Head Start and Head Start Centers in New Orleans, Louisiana. Two centers will serve as intervention sites and two as comparison sites. Over 90% of the network centers' students identify as Black, and all qualify for federally funded free meals and snacks. The intervention will include: (1) assisting ECEs with conducting self-assessments; (2) connecting ECEs with local farmers and food producers; (3) providing technical assistance for menu changes, procuring healthy food, identifying and implementing best feeding practices and policies for the environment; (4) delivering nutrition education; and (5) connecting parents/guardians with local food resources and affordable fresh food to be consumed at home. The intervention will be implemented for 6 months. Aim 1 uses a cross-sectional mixed methods design, collecting both quantitative and qualitative data in intervention centers. Aim 2 uses a pre-post design with a comparison group, collecting quantitative survey data at the center and parent level. At baseline and six-month follow-up, the investigators will conduct short surveys with staff and parents/caregivers of children attending ECEs.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALFarm to ECE programming

Students and parents at this center will receive program elements described in arm descriptions.

Sponsors

Xavier University of Louisiana.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

intervention and comparison

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

(Key informant interviews and center assessments): * Director or staff of participating center * 18 years of age minimum

Exclusion criteria

(Key informant interviews and center assessments): • Staff not involved with educational programming Inclusion Criteria (Parent/guardian surveys): * Parent or guardian of current student at participating center * 18 years of age minimum

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
incidence of parent/guardian use of community food resources6 monthsParent/guardian surveys will ask questions about use of community food resources. Frequencies will be calculated based on results.
nutrition environment score measured by NAPSACC6 monthsEnvironmental assessments and pre/post staff surveys using validated tools (Nutrition and Physical Activity Self-Assessment for Child Care NAPSACC) will be used to determine changes in the nutrition environment and healthy options. Nutrition environment scores will be calculated using the tool scoring guide.
percent completion of program components (fidelity)6 monthsStaff will be asked to complete tracking records of all executed program components. Percent completion will be calculated by dividing program components executed by total program components.
satisfaction score with program implementation6 monthsStaff will be asked to complete a post intervention survey to indicate their satisfaction (scale of 1-5) with the program implementation and its components.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026