Skip to content

The Impact of Food Reformulation on Energy Intake

The Impact of Food Reformulation on Energy Intake

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05744050
Enrollment
32
Registered
2023-02-24
Start date
2023-02-13
Completion date
2023-06-01
Last updated
2024-06-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diet, Healthy, Eating Behavior, Obesity

Brief summary

Food prepared outside of the home tends to have a high energy content, and high levels of nutrients of concern (sodium, fat, saturated fat and sugar), especially when compared to home-cooked food. A number of studies suggest that when energy density of a food is manipulated it has a linear effect on energy intake, because consumers tend to eat a constant weight of food. However, recent observational research suggested that up to approximately 1.5-2kcal/g, individuals are relatively insensitive to changes in energy density, and there is no indication of compensation through altering meal size. However, upwards of approximately 1.5-2kcal/g, the authors proposed that individuals compensate for increases in energy density by selecting and consuming smaller meal sizes. The investigators aim to measure participant's consumption (in grams and kilocalories) of three meals at low, medium and high energy densities, and to measure later food intake to observe any evidence of later compensation in response to experimental condition

Detailed description

See attached protocol document.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALLow energy density lunch

Particpants will be provided with a lunch low in energy density (\ 1.1kcal/g)

BEHAVIORALMedium energy density lunch

Participants will be provided with a lunch medium in energy density(\ 1.7kcal/g)

BEHAVIORALHigh energy density lunch

Participants will be provided with a lunch high in energy density (\ 3kcal/g)

Sponsors

University of Liverpool
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Repeated measures

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Currently reside in the United Kingdom * Over the age of 18 years * Fluent English speaker * Like the test foods * Have a BMI between the ranges of 18.5 and 35.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant/breastfeeding * Partaking in a fast or other restrictive eating for religious reasons at time of participation * Currently following a diet * On medication that affects appetite * Being a smoker * Current or historic eating disorder * Dietary restrictions/intolerances including: * Any allergies * Vegan/vegetarian * Gluten-free * Dairy-free * Sugar-free

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acute intake30 minutes after intervention administeredThe investigators will observe differences in consumption (g/kcal) when participants are given a meal covertly manipulated to be low, medium or high in energy density.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Later intakeUp to 7 hours after intervention administeredThe investigators will measure later food intake, in order to observe any evidence of later compensation in response to experimental condition.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026