Skip to content

Effects of Developing a Mobile-based Interactive Simulation Scheme for Assisting the Personalized Hands-on Learning of Nasogastric Tube Insertion

Effects of Developing a Mobile-based Interactive Simulation Scheme for Assisting the Personalized Hands-on Learning of Nasogastric Tube Insertion: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05742659
Enrollment
73
Registered
2023-02-24
Start date
2020-08-17
Completion date
2021-05-20
Last updated
2023-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nasogastric Tube Insertion

Brief summary

A mobile-based interactive simulation scheme (MISS) was proposed and developed to investigate its effects on facilitating hands-on learning of nasogastric tube insertion in undergraduate medical students.

Interventions

OTHERA mobile-based interactive simulation scheme (MISS)

A mobile-based interactive simulation scheme (MISS) was proposed and developed to investigate its effects on facilitating hands-on learning of NG insertion in undergraduate medical students.

Sponsors

National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* fifth-year undergraduate medical students * at least 20 years old * without any practical clinical experience

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The 10-item evaluation questionnaire on Nasogastric tube insertion knowledgeone week0-100. Zero is the worst, and 100 is the best.
The self-confidence scale (C-scale)one week1-5. One is high uncertainty, and five is complete certainty.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
System Usability Scale (SUS)one week1-5. One is strongly disagree, and five is strongly agree.
The NASA-TLX (Task load index)one week1-5. One is strongly disagree, and five is strongly agree.
The overall learning satisfactionone week1-5 each. One is strongly disagree, and five is strongly agree. The questionnaire included 20 questions, divided into 11 categories: perceived enjoyment, comparison, diagnosis report, satisfaction, intension to use, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, image, output quality, result demonstrability, and cognitive load.
The OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) testone week0-100. Zero is the worst, and 100 is the best.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026