Skip to content

HFNC in Management of Bronchiectasis Exacerbation

High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Non-invasive Ventilation in Managing Acute Exacerbation of Bronchiectasis Patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05741697
Enrollment
20
Registered
2023-02-23
Start date
2023-03-01
Completion date
2026-10-01
Last updated
2026-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bronchiectasis

Brief summary

Patients with Bronchiectasis experience exacerbations with hypercapnic respiratory failure associated with an increased respiratory workload that may require intensive care unit (ICU) admission due to the inability of the respiratory muscles to compensate for increased demand. These exacerbations are frequently treated with noninvasive ventilation (NIV).

Detailed description

NIV has been shown to unload the respiratory muscles, increase alveolar ventilation and gas exchange and reverse the rapid and shallow breathing pattern commonly adopted by bronchiectasis patients with advanced lung disease. NIV is a cornerstone therapy for hypercapnic acute respiratory failure. Still, there is also an increasing interest in high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) as a potential alternative treatment in this indication. HFNC delivers an actively heated and fully humidified gas mixture with flow rates up to 60 L/min and adjustable FiO2 from 21 to 100%. The high flow rates generate small amounts of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) that may help counterbalance the effects of intrinsic PEEP (PEEPi) on the work of breathing and might act by washing out of the physiological dead space. Furthermore, it could help to facilitate secretion clearance from the humidified gas. Studies have demonstrated the benefits of HFNC in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, after cardiothoracic surgery, and in preventing post-extubation failure among unselected cohorts of critically ill patients during weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation. However, the current evidence of using HFNC in patients with hypercapnic acute respiratory failure is limited. We aime to spotlight this research area.

Interventions

DRUGbi-level ventillation

non-invasive mechanical ventilation

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER
WGEKHALEEL
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
AARMHUSSIEN
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

* Patients will be eligible for enrolment if diagnosed with bronchiectasis and admitted to the respiratory intensive care unit (RICU), requiring ventilator support without invasive mechanical ventilation.

Exclusion criteria

* Age: less than 18 years. Patients with post-arrest encephalopathy. Patient with the previous tracheotomy. Patients who received invasive ventilatory support. Patients with end-organ failure.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of efficacy and patient compliance of high flow nasal canula system in comparison to Noninvasive mechanical ventilation in management of acute exacerbation of BronchiectasisMarch 2023 to December 2023The duration of ICU admission days and the patient compliance to both devices will be compared.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

CONTACTahmad shaddad, MD
shaddad_ahmad@yahoo.com+201111171930
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAhmad M. Shaddad

Assiut University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 1, 2026