Skip to content

Safety of Argatroban Infusion in Conduction Disturbances

SAICoDis - Safety of Argatroban Infusion in Conduction Disturbances. A Prospective, Open, Multicenter Safety Study to Investigate Conduction Disturbances in Patients Receiving Argatroban Therapy.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05740371
Acronym
SAICoDis
Enrollment
50
Registered
2023-02-23
Start date
2017-04-18
Completion date
2021-05-06
Last updated
2025-12-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stable Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), Unstable Angina (Troponin Negative)

Brief summary

To determine change of QTc interval during intravenous argatroban infusion in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

Detailed description

Primary objective: To determine change of corrected QT interval (QTc) during intravenous argatroban infusion in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Secondary objectives: * Determination of the QTc interval after sufficient wash-out period by ECG-3 which needed to be performed \> 8 but ≤ 28 hours after termination of prolonged argatroban infusion. * Investigation of dependence of QTc interval on gender and applied doses. * Determination of coagulation status during argatroban therapy. * Assessment of safety-related events within the scope of anticoagulation with argatroban, for example bleeding events or thromboembolic events.

Interventions

DRUGArgatroban

Patients received an intravenous (i.v.) bolus of 300 μg/kg argatroban administered over a span of 3 to 5 minutes followed by the i.v. infusion of argatroban at 20 μg/kg/min until the end of the procedure. ACT was checked 5 minutes after bolus dose. If ACT remained below the target of 300 s, the patient received an additional i.v. bolus injection of 150 μg/kg and the infusion dose was raised up to 30 μg/kg/min. In cases ACT \> 450 s, the infusion was reduced to 15 μg/kg/min and the value was checked again after 5 minutes. As soon as the target ACT (between 300 s and 450 s) was reached, infusion dose remained unchanged during the PCI procedure. Depending on clinical relevancy further ACT assessments were possible.

Sponsors

Tanabe Pharma GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of stable CAD or unstable angina (troponin negative, i.e. within the normal range for the study site) with low to moderate anatomic risk. * Patient required elective percutaneous coronary angioplasty or stent insertion with an approved device in one or more de novo-treated or re-stenotic lesions in native vessels. * Patient was on adequate platelet inhibition therapy after having received a loading dose with ASA and clopidogrel before start of intervention (this additional inclusion criterion was introduced with study protocol version 1.6, dated 14.12.2018) * Willingness to give written informed consent, written consent for data protection (legal requirement in Germany datenschutzrechtliche Einwilligung) and willingness to participate and to comply with the requirements of the study protocol. * The patient (female/male) was at least 18 years of age. * Baseline ECG without changes that impair assessment of QTc interval.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient was indicated for highly complex 3-vessel intervention. * The female patient was pregnant (exclusion by routine urine test) or was nursing during therapy period. * Patients who were currently participating in another clinical trial or patients who participated in another clinical trial during the last 3 months prior to study start (date of treatment visit). * History of drug, alcohol or chemical abuse within 6 months prior to study start. * Planned surgical intervention other than study procedure within 7 days after study start. * Any condition, which contraindicated the use of argatroban, or endangered the patient if he/she participated in this study. Factors influencing QTc interval: * Marked baseline prolongation of QTc interval (repeated demonstration of a QTc interval \> 450 ms at baseline ECG). * A history of risk factors of Torsade de pointes (e.g. heart failure, hypokalemia, family history of Long QT Syndrome). * Known intraventricular conduction disturbance. * Bradycardia: heart rate \< 45 min-1. * Electrolyte level outside normal range (according to laboratory's reference values). * The use of concomitant medications that interfered with the QTc interval. * Intake of digitalis within the last 2 weeks before study start. * Acute myocardial infarction or troponin-positive unstable angina. Factors inhibiting use of argatroban in this study: * Intolerance to ingredients of Argatra® (sorbitol). * Known cirrhosis, hepatitis, clinically significant hepatic disorder at study start and/or history of clinically relevant hepatic disorder. * Current hepatic disorder indicated by laboratory liver profile at screening: Bilirubin, AST/SGOT, ALT/SGPT, gammaGT \> 3.0 times upper limit of the normal (ULN). * Renal insufficiency indicated by laboratory renal profile at study start: GFR \< 35 ml/min. * Uncontrolled hypertension (defined as blood pressure \>180/120 mmHg). * If any form of heparin was taken prior to study start and aPTT ≥ 35 s. * Intake of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) within 1 month prior to study start. * If anticoagulants of type of vitamin K antagonists (VKA) were taken prior to study start and INR \>1.2. * Platelet count \<125 x 109/l. * Documented coagulation disorder or bleeding diathesis. * Uncontrolled haemorrhage within the past 3 months. * Uncontrolled peptic ulcer disease or gastrointestinal bleeding within the past 3 months. * Cerebral aneurysm. * Haemorrhagic stroke or ischaemic stroke in the past 6 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Difference in QTc Interval Between ECG-2 and ECG-1 (ITT Population)ECG-2 was recorded immediately after cardiac intervention when patient was fully anticoagulated with argatroban and ECG-1 was recorded at baseline prior to first bolus dose of argatroban (argatroban-free status).It was investigated if a mean QTc prolongation of more than 10 ms occurred between ECG-2 and ECG-1
Mean Difference in QTc Interval Between ECG-2 and ECG-1 (ITT Population/Subgroup Male or Female)ECG-2 was recorded immediately after cardiac intervention when patient was fully anticoagulated with argatroban and ECG-1 was recorded at baseline prior to first bolus dose of argatroban (argatroban-free status).It was investigated if a mean QTc prolongation of more than 10 ms occurred between ECG-2 and ECG-1
Mean Difference in QTc Interval Between ECG-2 and ECG-1 (ITT Population/Centre 01 or Centre 02)ECG-2 was recorded immediately after cardiac intervention when patient was fully anticoagulated with argatroban and ECG-1 was recorded at baseline prior to first bolus dose of argatroban (argatroban-free status).It was investigated if a mean QTc prolongation of more than 10 ms occurred between ECG-2 and ECG-1

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Patients With a Prolongation of QTc Interval to >500 ms at ECG-2ECG-2 immediately after argatroban infusionNumber of patients of ITT population exhibiting QTc interval of \> 500 ms

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Argatroban Intravenous (i.v.) Bolus & i.v. Infusion
i.v. bolus of 300 μg/kg argatroban administered over a span of 3 to 5 minutes followed by the i.v. infusion of argatroban at 20 μg/kg/min until the end of the procedure.
50
Total50

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArgatroban Intravenous (i.v.) Bolus & i.v. Infusion
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
26 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
24 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
49 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
39 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 50
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Difference in QTc Interval Between ECG-2 and ECG-1 (ITT Population)

It was investigated if a mean QTc prolongation of more than 10 ms occurred between ECG-2 and ECG-1

Time frame: ECG-2 was recorded immediately after cardiac intervention when patient was fully anticoagulated with argatroban and ECG-1 was recorded at baseline prior to first bolus dose of argatroban (argatroban-free status).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Argatroban Intravenous (i.v.) Bolus & i.v. Infusion (ITT Population)Mean Difference in QTc Interval Between ECG-2 and ECG-1 (ITT Population)0.94 millisecondsStandard Deviation 46.37
Primary

Mean Difference in QTc Interval Between ECG-2 and ECG-1 (ITT Population/Centre 01 or Centre 02)

It was investigated if a mean QTc prolongation of more than 10 ms occurred between ECG-2 and ECG-1

Time frame: ECG-2 was recorded immediately after cardiac intervention when patient was fully anticoagulated with argatroban and ECG-1 was recorded at baseline prior to first bolus dose of argatroban (argatroban-free status).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Argatroban Intravenous (i.v.) Bolus & i.v. Infusion (ITT Population)Mean Difference in QTc Interval Between ECG-2 and ECG-1 (ITT Population/Centre 01 or Centre 02)15.0046 millisecondsStandard Deviation 44.9538
Argatroban Intravenous (i.v.) Bolus & i.v. Infusion (ITT Population/Sub Group Female)Mean Difference in QTc Interval Between ECG-2 and ECG-1 (ITT Population/Centre 01 or Centre 02)-13.1343 millisecondsStandard Deviation 44.2363
Primary

Mean Difference in QTc Interval Between ECG-2 and ECG-1 (ITT Population/Subgroup Male or Female)

It was investigated if a mean QTc prolongation of more than 10 ms occurred between ECG-2 and ECG-1

Time frame: ECG-2 was recorded immediately after cardiac intervention when patient was fully anticoagulated with argatroban and ECG-1 was recorded at baseline prior to first bolus dose of argatroban (argatroban-free status).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Argatroban Intravenous (i.v.) Bolus & i.v. Infusion (ITT Population)Mean Difference in QTc Interval Between ECG-2 and ECG-1 (ITT Population/Subgroup Male or Female)-5.8936 millisecondsStandard Deviation 46.4072
Argatroban Intravenous (i.v.) Bolus & i.v. Infusion (ITT Population/Sub Group Female)Mean Difference in QTc Interval Between ECG-2 and ECG-1 (ITT Population/Subgroup Male or Female)25.1460 millisecondsStandard Deviation 39.0616
Secondary

Proportion of Patients With a Prolongation of QTc Interval to >500 ms at ECG-2

Number of patients of ITT population exhibiting QTc interval of \> 500 ms

Time frame: ECG-2 immediately after argatroban infusion

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Argatroban Intravenous (i.v.) Bolus & i.v. Infusion (ITT Population)Proportion of Patients With a Prolongation of QTc Interval to >500 ms at ECG-21 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026