Skip to content

Comparative Study of Prognosis and QOL Between APD-RPM and CAPD

Comparative Study of Automated Peritoneal Dialysis With Remote Patient Management And Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis on the Prognosis and QOL in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05738525
Enrollment
750
Registered
2023-02-22
Start date
2023-06-30
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2023-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

End-stage Renal Disease

Keywords

APD-RPM, CAPD, Prognosis, QOL, Comparative Study

Brief summary

This is an observational, multicenter, parallel control study, planning to enroll 750 eligible patients to receive automated peritoneal dialysis with remote patient management (APD-RPM) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Patients will attend follow-up every 12 ± 1 weeks for a total of 156 weeks. This study aims to compare the effects of APD-RPM and CAPD treatment on the prognosis and quality of life.

Detailed description

This is an observational study based on the real-word diagnosis and treatments. Target subject population include end-stage renal disease patients (aged 18-75 years) with peritoneal dialysis 3 months and longer. Standard peritoneal balance test of eligible patients should be rapid peritoneal solute transfer rate (4-hour D/P creatinine value \> 0.65). Patients will be divided into two groups to receive standard APD-RPM or CAPD with a ratio of 1:2. Peritoneal dialysis in APD-RPM group (n=250): (1) APD mode is recommended but not limited to continuous circulating peritoneal dialysis (CCPD); (2) Dialysis dose ranges from 5 to 10 liters per day and depends on previous APD prescription and dialysis adequacy; (3) Glucose concentration starts from low concentration (1.5%) and depends on previous dialysis prescription. Peritoneal dialysis in CAPD group (n=500): (1) Dialysis dose ranges from 5 to 10 liters per day at the run-in period. For those with regular peritoneal dialysis, the original dose can be used according to the volume status and solute clearance effect in the past 3 months; (2) Exchange time and abdominal retention time is generally 2-5 times and 1 time at daytime and night, separately; (3) Glucose concentration includes 1.5%, 2.5% or 4.25%; (4) The treatments can be adjusted according to the change of residual renal function, peritoneal transport characteristics, volume status, solute clearance, clinical status and peritonitis.

Interventions

DEVICEAPD-RPM

APD mode is recommended but not limited to continuous circulating peritoneal dialysis (CCPD); (2) Dialysis dose ranges from 5 to 10 liters per day and depends on previous APD prescription and dialysis adequacy; (3) Glucose concentration starts from low concentration (1.5%) and depends on previous dialysis prescription. Remote monitoring includes dynamic changes of the overall treatment situation, warning or any abnormal notes, and drainage, retention and duration of APD per day.

Sponsors

Chinese PLA General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18 years to 75 years * Confirmed diagnosis of end-stage renal disease * Standard peritoneal balance test shows rapid peritoneal solute transfer rate, defined as 4 hours D/P creatinine value greater than 0.65 * Be able to comply with the standard peritoneal dialysis treatment at home * Peritoneal dialysis time 3 months and longer * Fully understand the study and have signed the informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Prepare for kidney transplantation within 3 years * Need combined treatment of hemodialysis * Be allergic to components of peritoneal dialysis fluid * Complicated with severe cardio-cerebrovascular diseases such as congestive heart failure, grade III and above of NYHA classification, acute myocardial infarction within 3 months, malignant arrhythmia requiring treatment, dilated cardiomyopathy, acute cerebral infarction or acute cerebral hemorrhage within 3 months, etc. * Complicated with serious liver diseases, such as cirrhosis or acute liver injury \[Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 2 times greater the the normal\] * Active or treated residual malignant tumors, HIV infection * Pregnant or lactating women at childbearing age who disagree to use effective contraceptives during the trial * History of alcohol or drug (illegal drugs) abuse * Unable to continue CAPD due to ultrafiltration failure * Mental retardation or mental illness * Patients who use icodextrin dialysate * Participation in other clinical trials in the past 3 months * Peritonitis in the past 3 months * Other situations decided by the investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite endpoint of all-cause deaths/technical failure156 weeks from baselineThe time from baseline to all-cause death or technical failure
Quality of life (QOL)156 weeks from baselineChange of quality of life (QOL) score from the baseline
Returning to society156 weeks from baselineChange of assessment of returning to society from the baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hypertension and antihypertension drugsUp to 156 weeksProportion of well-controlled hypertension. Quantity of antihypertension drugs
Peritonitis156 weeks from baselineProportion of peritonitis. Time to first peritonitis from enrollment
Glomerular Filtration RateUp to 156 weeksChange of slope of renal function Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)
Cardio-cerebrovascular eventsUp to 156 weeksIncidence of cardio-cerebrovascular events, including sudden cardiac death, serious arrhythmia, coronary heart disease requiring interventional treatment, congestive heart failure with grade III and above of New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, acute cerebral infarction, and acute cerebral hemorrhage
Adequacy of dialysisUp to 156 weeksProportion of adequacy of dialysis
Prescription adjustment, outpatient follow-up and unplanned outpatient visitsUp to 156 weeksTimes of prescription adjustment, outpatient follow-up and unplanned outpatient visits
HospitalizationUp to 156 weeksProportion of hospitalization and unplanned hospitalization
Nutritional status24, 48, 72, 96 120, 144, 156 weekChange of subjective global assessment (SGA) score from baseline
Ultrafiltration rateUp to 156 weeksChange of ultrafiltration rate from baseline
Capacity overloadUp to 156 weeksDegree, proportion and frequency of capacity overload

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactXiangmei Chen
xmchen301@126.com86-10-66935462
Backup ContactJianhui Zhou
china_pd@126.com86-10-66937011

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026