Skip to content

COMPARISON OF SECTIONAL MATRIX VERSUES CIRCUMFERENTIAL MATRIX FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF PROXIMAL CONTACT IN CLASS 2 RESTORATIONS

COMPARISON OF SECTIONAL MATRIX VERSUES CIRCUMFERENTIAL MATRIX FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF PROXIMAL CONTACT IN CLASS 2 RESTORATIONS

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05734027
Enrollment
80
Registered
2023-02-17
Start date
2022-08-27
Completion date
2023-03-10
Last updated
2023-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tooth Decay

Brief summary

Class II caries affects proximal surfaces of premolars and maintain their anatomical proximal contact of tooth, is important to avoid food impaction in the interdental area for protection of periodontium and occurrence of secondary carious lesion.Different types of Matrix band system are used to restore tooth cavities with missing proximal walls, including flat or pre-contoured bands, retainer-fixed circumferential systems, and sectional matrices, and either metal or plastic matrices which produces good contours and contacts for use with amalgam and can also be employed for insertion of composite resin.This study aimed at assessing the influence of different matricing techniques :either sectional matrix or circumferential matrix and the influence of operator experience on reproduction of optimum proximal contacts for posterior proximal resin composite restorations.

Detailed description

Local anesthesia will be administrated, and the whole quadrant containing the offending tooth will be isolated by using a rubber dam.After caries removal and cavity preparation, matrix systems will be applied by dentist ; using either a sectional matrix system and circumferential matrix system.A properly sized wedge will be used with both systems to secure both matrices in place cervically and to prevent gingival overhangs , Resin composite restorations will be completed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Selective enamel etching will be performed by using etchant followed by applying Single Bond Universal adhesive to the entire surface of the enamel and dentin. Then, a thin layer of flowable composite will be applied to ensure adaptation at the gingival margin. Finally, prepared cavities will be restored by using resin composite. using the centripetal technique to build a proximal wall initially followed by successive cusp building. Restorations will be finished by using a flame-shaped finishing stone and polished, and the occlusal contact points will be checked by using a articulating paper. Tightness of proximal contacts will be evaluated using dental floss . For assessment of the restoration, the patients will be sitting in a dental unit with a standardized seating position, which will be reproduced by the unit's preset positioning system, and assessors evaluated the proximal contact by using unwaxed dental floss following theFDI recommendations accordingly to be either optimum, tight, or open contact.Proximal contacts will be categorized as optimum, open, and tight; if the dental floss passed through the contact area as natural dentition on the other side, it will be considered as an optimum contact point. Open contact points will be considered when the dental floss passed through the contact area without resistance; however, when the dental floss could not be passed at all or tore, proximal contact will be considered as tight.

Interventions

DEVICESectional matrix

The sectional matrix is the best way to achieve a strong contact point in Class II restorations with composite resin in the posterior dental sector. The pre-wedging is essential to get a separation between teeth which avoid the matrix deformation during its insertion

DEVICECircumferential matrix

Circumferential matrix (thickness 0.038mm) ,the band encircle the tooth and secured by retainer on the buccal and lingual aspect

Sponsors

Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Tooth with compound class 2 cavities Patient with good general health. Patient with minimum age of 18 years. Fully erupted occluding premolar and molar teeth.

Exclusion criteria

Tooth complex class 2 cavities. Tooth with severe periodontal disease. Diastema between posterior teeth. Third molars are excluded. . Tooth mobility greater than 1 mm.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tightness of proximal contactimmediately after the procedureProximal contact either optimum, tight, or open contact by using dental floss

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

Primary Contactsheejia Asif, Bds
sheejiaasif344@gmail.com03165518512
Backup ContactAqsa Waheed, Bds
q.aqsa@rocketmail.com03063422518

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026