Skip to content

Decision Making Support for Parents and Caregivers

Decision Making Support for Parents and Caregivers

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05733975
Enrollment
104
Registered
2023-02-17
Start date
2023-05-02
Completion date
2024-01-29
Last updated
2025-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neonatal Critical Illness, Pediatric Critical Illness

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility and acceptability of a tool to support decision making for parents of critically ill infants.

Detailed description

In this single-arm mixed methods prospective feasibility study, we will enroll infants, parents, and clinicians. The intervention is a paper-based decision guide that contains a values clarification exercise and question prompt list.

Interventions

OTHERDecision Making Guide

The tool includes a brief introduction to the tool and decision-making, a values clarification exercise, and a question prompt list.

Sponsors

National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
CollaboratorNIH
Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Days to 1 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Study participants will include English-speaking parents of critically ill infants and children admitted to Duke University Hospital. Infant inclusion criteria will include 1. age \< 1 year, 2. admission to a critical care unit, and 3. an anticipated serious health care decision All parents of eligible infants will be considered for inclusion. Parent

Exclusion criteria

will include 1) age \< 18 years, 2) hearing or speech impairment, and 3) non-English speakers. All clinicians of eligible infants will be considered for inclusion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Enrollment Rate (Critically Ill Infants)At enrollment (approximately 9 months)Intervention and study procedures considered feasible if infant enrollment rate is greater than or equal to 50%.
Complete Data Collection (Critically Ill Infants)approximately 9 monthsComplete data collection defined as all eligible infant, parent, and clinician data points collected for a given case and was determined at the level of the critically ill infant. Data points for which the participant withdrew prior to relevant data collection were excluded. Intervention and study procedures considered feasible if complete data collection rate is greater than or equal to 80%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Parent and Clinician AcceptabilityUp to 4 weeks following use of the toolAcceptability will be measured using an acceptability questionnaire, consisting of close-ended items with 5-point likert scale response options (strongly disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, strongly agree).
Parent Psychological Distress, as Measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Baseline, and up to 4 weeks following use of the toolPROMIS measures assess the extent to which patients experience challenges with symptoms over the past 7 days. Scores are derived using a standardized T-score metric, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores reflect greater symptom severity.
Parent Preparation for Decision Making, as Measured by the PrepDMUp to 4 weeks following use of the toolItems can be summed and scored. Score ranges from 0-100, where a higher score indicates higher perceived preparedness for decision making.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited based on assessment of infant eligibility and approval from primary physician. Parental consent was obtained based on eligible participants. The first participant was enrolled on May 2, 2023 and the last participant was enrolled January 29, 2024.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Critically Ill Infants
Parent(s) of critically ill infants received the decision making guide intervention and could choose to share their completed tool with their infant's clinicians.
30
Parent(s) of Critically Ill Infant
Parent(s) of critically ill infants received the decision making guide intervention and could choose to share their completed tool with their infant's clinicians.
43
Clinicians
Parent(s) of critically ill infants received the decision making guide intervention and could choose to share their completed tool with their infant's clinicians.
30
Total103

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCritically Ill InfantsTotalParent(s) of Critically Ill InfantClinicians
Age, Continuous
Age at enrollment
20 days20 days
Age, Continuous34.0 years30.0 years41.0 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants10 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
26 Participants93 Participants39 Participants28 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants5 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
15 Participants33 Participants15 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants5 Participants4 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
13 Participants57 Participants19 Participants25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants62 Participants30 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants41 Participants13 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 300 / 440 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 300 / 440 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 300 / 440 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Complete Data Collection (Critically Ill Infants)

Complete data collection defined as all eligible infant, parent, and clinician data points collected for a given case and was determined at the level of the critically ill infant. Data points for which the participant withdrew prior to relevant data collection were excluded. Intervention and study procedures considered feasible if complete data collection rate is greater than or equal to 80%.

Time frame: approximately 9 months

Population: Critically ill infants who completed the study.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Critically Ill InfantsComplete Data Collection (Critically Ill Infants)Completed data collection29 Participants
Critically Ill InfantsComplete Data Collection (Critically Ill Infants)Incomplete data collection1 Participants
Primary

Enrollment Rate (Critically Ill Infants)

Intervention and study procedures considered feasible if infant enrollment rate is greater than or equal to 50%.

Time frame: At enrollment (approximately 9 months)

Population: Eligible critically ill infants.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Critically Ill InfantsEnrollment Rate (Critically Ill Infants)Not enrolled/ consented24 Participants
Critically Ill InfantsEnrollment Rate (Critically Ill Infants)Enrolled/ Consented30 Participants
Secondary

Parent and Clinician Acceptability

Acceptability will be measured using an acceptability questionnaire, consisting of close-ended items with 5-point likert scale response options (strongly disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, strongly agree).

Time frame: Up to 4 weeks following use of the tool

Population: Not applicable to the infant group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Critically Ill InfantsParent and Clinician AcceptabilityFound to be helpful (all other response items)10 Participants
Critically Ill InfantsParent and Clinician AcceptabilityWould recommend to other parents (all other response items)5 Participants
Critically Ill InfantsParent and Clinician AcceptabilityFound to be helpful (agreed/strongly agreed)30 Participants
Critically Ill InfantsParent and Clinician AcceptabilityWould use in the future (agreed/strongly agreed)33 Participants
Critically Ill InfantsParent and Clinician AcceptabilityWould recommend to other parents (agreed/ Strongly agreed)35 Participants
Critically Ill InfantsParent and Clinician AcceptabilityWould use in the future (all other response items)7 Participants
CliniciansParent and Clinician AcceptabilityWould use in the future (all other response items)1 Participants
CliniciansParent and Clinician AcceptabilityFound to be helpful (agreed/strongly agreed)28 Participants
CliniciansParent and Clinician AcceptabilityFound to be helpful (all other response items)2 Participants
CliniciansParent and Clinician AcceptabilityWould recommend to other parents (agreed/ Strongly agreed)29 Participants
CliniciansParent and Clinician AcceptabilityWould recommend to other parents (all other response items)1 Participants
CliniciansParent and Clinician AcceptabilityWould use in the future (agreed/strongly agreed)29 Participants
Secondary

Parent Preparation for Decision Making, as Measured by the PrepDM

Items can be summed and scored. Score ranges from 0-100, where a higher score indicates higher perceived preparedness for decision making.

Time frame: Up to 4 weeks following use of the tool

Population: Only applicable to the parent group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Critically Ill InfantsParent Preparation for Decision Making, as Measured by the PrepDM73.75 score on a scale
Secondary

Parent Psychological Distress, as Measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)

PROMIS measures assess the extent to which patients experience challenges with symptoms over the past 7 days. Scores are derived using a standardized T-score metric, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores reflect greater symptom severity.

Time frame: Baseline, and up to 4 weeks following use of the tool

Population: Only applicable to the parent group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Critically Ill InfantsParent Psychological Distress, as Measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Baseline PROMIS: Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities53.8 score on a scale
Critically Ill InfantsParent Psychological Distress, as Measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Post Intervention PROMIS: Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities51.8 score on a scale
Critically Ill InfantsParent Psychological Distress, as Measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Baseline PROMIS: Emotional Distress-Anxiety57.7 score on a scale
Critically Ill InfantsParent Psychological Distress, as Measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Post Intervention PROMIS: Emotional Distress-Anxiety57.5 score on a scale
Critically Ill InfantsParent Psychological Distress, as Measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Baseline PROMIS: Emotional Distress - Depression47.8 score on a scale
Critically Ill InfantsParent Psychological Distress, as Measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Post Intervention PROMIS: Emotional Distress - Depression52.5 score on a scale
Critically Ill InfantsParent Psychological Distress, as Measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Baseline PROMIS: Fatigue53.9 score on a scale
Critically Ill InfantsParent Psychological Distress, as Measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Post Intervention: Fatigue53.2 score on a scale
Critically Ill InfantsParent Psychological Distress, as Measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Baseline PROMIS: Pain Interference49.2 score on a scale
Critically Ill InfantsParent Psychological Distress, as Measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Post Intervention PROMIS: Pain Interference41.6 score on a scale
Critically Ill InfantsParent Psychological Distress, as Measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Baseline PROMIS: Physical Function57.0 score on a scale
Critically Ill InfantsParent Psychological Distress, as Measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Post Intervention PROMIS: Physical Function57.0 score on a scale
Critically Ill InfantsParent Psychological Distress, as Measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Baseline PROMIS: Sleep Disturbance50.1 score on a scale
Critically Ill InfantsParent Psychological Distress, as Measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Post-Intervention PROMIS: Sleep Disturbance51.4 score on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026