Bisexuality, HIV Infections, Homosexuality
Conditions
Brief summary
Participants are Vietnamese national. Over the course of the study activities, approximately 184 self-identified Vietnamese national gay and bisexual men ages 18 and above living in HCMC, Viet Nam, as well as 10 key informants (about 5 females) ages 18 and above will participate in the study.
Detailed description
The mixed-method study will involve: (1) preparation stage; (2) formative stage, where qualitative data from Vietnamese GBM and key informants will inform the adaptation of the ESTEEM package; (3) feasibility test, where the adapted intervention will be piloted-test in a small sample (4 small group, N = 24) of GBM and further adjusted on the pilot-test results; and (4) small-scale efficacy test of the adjusted intervention using a randomized waitlist controlled design in a cohort of 120 GBM, where they will be randomly assigned to either the immediate intervention (6 groups) or a waitlist arm (6 groups) with 10 men per groups. During the preparation stage, the investigators will obtain ethical approval from the Florida State University's Institutional Review Board. The investigators will identify and hire staff knowledgeable about the local socio-cultural context pertaining to GBM, fluent in Vietnamese, and familiar with research-oriented studies. All personnel and individual contacting with the study on human participants will be trained on human subject protection. During the qualitative formative stage, the investigators will conduct individual interviews (N = 15) of GBM community representatives, focus group (4 group, N = 25) with GBN community representative and individual interviews (N = 10) of key informants. Key informants (e.g., outreach workers, counselors, consultant, psychologists, program managers) will consist of adults with experience working with GBM in the areas of mental or sexual health, stigma, and/or legal protection. Interviews and focus groups will be audio-recorded. The investigators will intersperse key informant interviews, individual interviews, and focus groups with GBM and the process of ESTEEM adaptation in an iterative manner. For the feasibility test stage, the investigators will recruit 24 GBM to pilot test the adapted intervention in small groups (N = 6 per group) setting to meet once weekly for a period of 8 week. During the intervention, qualitative data will be collected via baseline and endline surveys. Qualitative data will be collected from individual interviews after each individual session in addition to ta final individual and 4 focus groups after completion of all sessions in the intervention. These data will be used to revise the intervention as needed for the small-scale efficacy stage. Audio-recordings of interviews and focus groups from the formative and feasibility test stages will be transcribed verbatim and analyzed in MaxQDA software using thematic analysis. Data from interviews and focus groups will be complemented by information from peer facilitators' oral feedback and participants' open-ended questionnaires. Qualitative data analysis will be guided by the intervention feasibility domains --acceptability, demand, implementation, practicality, adaptation, integration, and expansion. Due to the small sample size (N = 24) in the feasibility test no inferential statistical analysis of quantitative data will be performed. The investigators will only determine the direction of changes in the primary outcomes and assess effect sizes. For the small-scale efficacy stage, the investigators will enroll and assign 120 consented participants to 12 small groups and with 10 individuals in each group. Then the investigators will randomize the small groups into the immediate intervention and waitlist arms (6 groups in each arm). All participants will complete 3 waves of data collection: baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up. Power calculations (using PROC POWRR in SAS 9.4 and assuming an intra-cluster correlation of 10%) demonstrates that a sample size of 120 is sufficiently large to detect medium effect size of d = 0.477 via a one-sided independent t-test. The investigators will include all randomized participants into the analysis using an intent-to-treat approach. The investigators will use mixed models with appropriate distribution and link functions based on endpoint variable properties along with repeated measures approach to account for within individual and group correction.
Interventions
The investigators propose and pilot test a community-based, peer-driven minority stress as well as HIV-stigma reduction program in small group of GBM in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
This study does not involve masking of participants, care providers, or investigators.
Intervention model description
This study follows a parallel design, where participants are randomized into two arms-immediate intervention and waitlist control. The study aims to test the feasibility and efficacy of the ESTEEM intervention in small groups, with ongoing assessment over a 6-month period.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* born as a biological male and self-identifying as a man * ages 18 and above, * self-reported as gay or bisexual * a verifiable HIV-negative status * reporting at least one episode of unprotected anal sex with a casual male partner or male partner with positive or unknown HIV-status in the past 30 days * able and willing to provide verbal and written informed consent in Vietnamese * intending to stay in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam, not to leave the city for more than one week in the next two months.
Exclusion criteria
* Has a known psychiatric disorder * is under influence of alcohol and/or drugs * ages 17 and below.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Audit-C | T1Intervention: Mean time from baseline 0.09 months (SD 0.28), T1Waitlist: 0.03 mo. (SD 0.20). T2Intervention: Mean timing 1.73 months (SD 0.87), T2Waitlist: 2.02 mo. (SD 1.04). T3Intervention: Mean timing 5.51 mo. (SD 0.57), T3Waitlist 3.41 mo. (SD 0.95) | Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test Min Score: 0 Max Score: 12 Higher score correlates with worse outcome |
| Illicit Drug Use | T1Intervention: Mean time from baseline 0.09 months (SD 0.28), T1Waitlist: 0.03 mo. (SD 0.20). T2Intervention: Mean timing 1.73 months (SD 0.87), T2Waitlist: 2.02 mo. (SD 1.04). T3Intervention: Mean timing 5.51 mo. (SD 0.57), T3Waitlist 3.41 mo. (SD 0.95) | Any illicit drug use and count of illicit drug use by intervention arm and time |
| Condom Use | T1Intervention: Mean time from baseline 0.09 months (SD 0.28), T1Waitlist: 0.03 mo. (SD 0.20). T2Intervention: Mean timing 1.73 months (SD 0.87), T2Waitlist: 2.02 mo. (SD 1.04). T3Intervention: Mean timing 5.51 mo. (SD 0.57), T3Waitlist 3.41 mo. (SD 0.95) | Condom use episodes with main partner in last 3 months |
| HIV Testing | Over course of participant's lifetime | HIV testing results (ever) Measures number of participants who have ever been tested for HIV, at least once Administered at T2 timepoint Participants must be HIV-negative to enroll and maintain enrollment in study |
| CES-D | T1Intervention: Mean time from baseline 0.09 months (SD 0.28), T1Waitlist: 0.03 mo. (SD 0.20). T2Intervention: Mean timing 1.73 months (SD 0.87), T2Waitlist: 2.02 mo. (SD 1.04). T3Intervention: Mean timing 5.51 mo. (SD 0.57), T3Waitlist 3.41 mo. (SD 0.95) | Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale Min Score: 0 Max Score: 60 Higher score correlates with worse outcome |
| ODSIS | T1Intervention: Mean time from baseline 0.09 months (SD 0.28), T1Waitlist: 0.03 mo. (SD 0.20). T2Intervention: Mean timing 1.73 months (SD 0.87), T2Waitlist: 2.02 mo. (SD 1.04). T3Intervention: Mean timing 5.51 mo. (SD 0.57), T3Waitlist 3.41 mo. (SD 0.95) | Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale Min Score: 0 Max Score: 20 Higher score correlates with worse outcome |
| OASIS | T1Intervention: Mean time from baseline 0.09 months (SD 0.28), T1Waitlist: 0.03 mo. (SD 0.20). T2Intervention: Mean timing 1.73 months (SD 0.87), T2Waitlist: 2.02 mo. (SD 1.04). T3Intervention: Mean timing 5.51 mo. (SD 0.57), T3Waitlist 3.41 mo. (SD 0.95) | Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale Min Score: 0 Max Score: 20 Higher score correlates with worse outcome |
Countries
Vietnam
Contacts
Florida State University
Participant flow
Recruitment details
194 people assessed for eligibility. 20 did not meet inclusion criteria for attendance. 7 could not be reached despite repeated contact attempts. 167 people were thus enrolled in the study.
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | — |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 26.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3 |
| Education Bachelor | 87 Participants |
| Education Don't Know | 0 Participants |
| Education Elementary | 0 Participants |
| Education High School | 26 Participants |
| Education Junior HS | 1 Participants |
| Education Masters/PhD | 2 Participants |
| Education No school | 0 Participants |
| Education Refused | 1 Participants |
| Education Vocational | 6 Participants |
| Household Income 10-14.9M Vietnamese dong | 20 Participants |
| Household Income 15-19.9M Vietnamese dong | 5 Participants |
| Household Income >20M Vietnamese dong | 14 Participants |
| Household Income 5-9.9M Vietnamese dong | 10 Participants |
| Household Income <5M Vietnamese dong | 1 Participants |
| Household Income Don't Know | 17 Participants |
| Household Income Refused to Answer | 19 Participants |
| Household Size | 2.9 people STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7 |
| Housing Dorm | 2 Participants |
| Housing Family Home | 23 Participants |
| Housing Motel/Hotel | 8 Participants |
| Housing Non-Family Home | 2 Participants |
| Housing Other | 1 Participants |
| Housing Own | 3 Participants |
| Housing Refused to Answer | 2 Participants |
| Housing Rent | 24 Participants |
| Housing Street/Public | 0 Participants |
| Marital Status Declined to Answer | 1 Participants |
| Marital Status Married | 2 Participants |
| Marital Status Relationship | 38 Participants |
| Marital Status Single | 103 Participants |
| Monthly Income 10-14.9M Vietnamese dong | 18 Participants |
| Monthly Income 15-19.9M Vietnamese dong | 1 Participants |
| Monthly Income >20M Vietnamese dong | 1 Participants |
| Monthly Income 5-9.9M Vietnamese dong | 18 Participants |
| Monthly Income <5M Vietnamese dong | 24 Participants |
| Monthly Income Don't Know | 1 Participants |
| Monthly Income Refused to Answer | 4 Participants |
| Number of Children | 0.1 Number of children STANDARD_DEVIATION 1 |
| Occupation Refused to Answer | 1 Participants |
| Occupation School | 9 Participants |
| Occupation Unemployed | 2 Participants |
| Occupation Work | 34 Participants |
| Occupation Work and School | 20 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Ethnicity Kinh (Viet) | 71 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Ethnicity Other | 6 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Vietnam | 77 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 77 Participants |
| Sexual Orientation Bisexual | 2 Participants |
| Sexual Orientation Heterosexual | 0 Participants |
| Sexual Orientation Homosexual | 75 Participants |
| Sexual Orientation Other | 7 Participants |
| Years of Residence | 10 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 83 | 0 / 84 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 83 | 0 / 84 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 83 | 0 / 84 |