Skip to content

Skills to Empower Affirmative Men

Stress and HIV-related Stigma Among Men in Viet Nam

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05732675
Acronym
VINA STEAM
Enrollment
167
Registered
2023-02-17
Start date
2021-09-01
Completion date
2025-03-01
Last updated
2026-08-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bisexuality, HIV Infections, Homosexuality

Brief summary

Participants are Vietnamese national. Over the course of the study activities, approximately 184 self-identified Vietnamese national gay and bisexual men ages 18 and above living in HCMC, Viet Nam, as well as 10 key informants (about 5 females) ages 18 and above will participate in the study.

Detailed description

The mixed-method study will involve: (1) preparation stage; (2) formative stage, where qualitative data from Vietnamese GBM and key informants will inform the adaptation of the ESTEEM package; (3) feasibility test, where the adapted intervention will be piloted-test in a small sample (4 small group, N = 24) of GBM and further adjusted on the pilot-test results; and (4) small-scale efficacy test of the adjusted intervention using a randomized waitlist controlled design in a cohort of 120 GBM, where they will be randomly assigned to either the immediate intervention (6 groups) or a waitlist arm (6 groups) with 10 men per groups. During the preparation stage, the investigators will obtain ethical approval from the Florida State University's Institutional Review Board. The investigators will identify and hire staff knowledgeable about the local socio-cultural context pertaining to GBM, fluent in Vietnamese, and familiar with research-oriented studies. All personnel and individual contacting with the study on human participants will be trained on human subject protection. During the qualitative formative stage, the investigators will conduct individual interviews (N = 15) of GBM community representatives, focus group (4 group, N = 25) with GBN community representative and individual interviews (N = 10) of key informants. Key informants (e.g., outreach workers, counselors, consultant, psychologists, program managers) will consist of adults with experience working with GBM in the areas of mental or sexual health, stigma, and/or legal protection. Interviews and focus groups will be audio-recorded. The investigators will intersperse key informant interviews, individual interviews, and focus groups with GBM and the process of ESTEEM adaptation in an iterative manner. For the feasibility test stage, the investigators will recruit 24 GBM to pilot test the adapted intervention in small groups (N = 6 per group) setting to meet once weekly for a period of 8 week. During the intervention, qualitative data will be collected via baseline and endline surveys. Qualitative data will be collected from individual interviews after each individual session in addition to ta final individual and 4 focus groups after completion of all sessions in the intervention. These data will be used to revise the intervention as needed for the small-scale efficacy stage. Audio-recordings of interviews and focus groups from the formative and feasibility test stages will be transcribed verbatim and analyzed in MaxQDA software using thematic analysis. Data from interviews and focus groups will be complemented by information from peer facilitators' oral feedback and participants' open-ended questionnaires. Qualitative data analysis will be guided by the intervention feasibility domains --acceptability, demand, implementation, practicality, adaptation, integration, and expansion. Due to the small sample size (N = 24) in the feasibility test no inferential statistical analysis of quantitative data will be performed. The investigators will only determine the direction of changes in the primary outcomes and assess effect sizes. For the small-scale efficacy stage, the investigators will enroll and assign 120 consented participants to 12 small groups and with 10 individuals in each group. Then the investigators will randomize the small groups into the immediate intervention and waitlist arms (6 groups in each arm). All participants will complete 3 waves of data collection: baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up. Power calculations (using PROC POWRR in SAS 9.4 and assuming an intra-cluster correlation of 10%) demonstrates that a sample size of 120 is sufficiently large to detect medium effect size of d = 0.477 via a one-sided independent t-test. The investigators will include all randomized participants into the analysis using an intent-to-treat approach. The investigators will use mixed models with appropriate distribution and link functions based on endpoint variable properties along with repeated measures approach to account for within individual and group correction.

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL"VINA STEAM" (Skills to Empower Affirmative Men)

The investigators propose and pilot test a community-based, peer-driven minority stress as well as HIV-stigma reduction program in small group of GBM in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.

Sponsors

Florida State University
Lead SponsorOTHER
Fogarty International Center of the National Institute of Health
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

This study does not involve masking of participants, care providers, or investigators.

Intervention model description

This study follows a parallel design, where participants are randomized into two arms-immediate intervention and waitlist control. The study aims to test the feasibility and efficacy of the ESTEEM intervention in small groups, with ongoing assessment over a 6-month period.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* born as a biological male and self-identifying as a man * ages 18 and above, * self-reported as gay or bisexual * a verifiable HIV-negative status * reporting at least one episode of unprotected anal sex with a casual male partner or male partner with positive or unknown HIV-status in the past 30 days * able and willing to provide verbal and written informed consent in Vietnamese * intending to stay in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam, not to leave the city for more than one week in the next two months.

Exclusion criteria

* Has a known psychiatric disorder * is under influence of alcohol and/or drugs * ages 17 and below.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Audit-CT1Intervention: Mean time from baseline 0.09 months (SD 0.28), T1Waitlist: 0.03 mo. (SD 0.20). T2Intervention: Mean timing 1.73 months (SD 0.87), T2Waitlist: 2.02 mo. (SD 1.04). T3Intervention: Mean timing 5.51 mo. (SD 0.57), T3Waitlist 3.41 mo. (SD 0.95)Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test Min Score: 0 Max Score: 12 Higher score correlates with worse outcome
Illicit Drug UseT1Intervention: Mean time from baseline 0.09 months (SD 0.28), T1Waitlist: 0.03 mo. (SD 0.20). T2Intervention: Mean timing 1.73 months (SD 0.87), T2Waitlist: 2.02 mo. (SD 1.04). T3Intervention: Mean timing 5.51 mo. (SD 0.57), T3Waitlist 3.41 mo. (SD 0.95)Any illicit drug use and count of illicit drug use by intervention arm and time
Condom UseT1Intervention: Mean time from baseline 0.09 months (SD 0.28), T1Waitlist: 0.03 mo. (SD 0.20). T2Intervention: Mean timing 1.73 months (SD 0.87), T2Waitlist: 2.02 mo. (SD 1.04). T3Intervention: Mean timing 5.51 mo. (SD 0.57), T3Waitlist 3.41 mo. (SD 0.95)Condom use episodes with main partner in last 3 months
HIV TestingOver course of participant's lifetimeHIV testing results (ever) Measures number of participants who have ever been tested for HIV, at least once Administered at T2 timepoint Participants must be HIV-negative to enroll and maintain enrollment in study
CES-DT1Intervention: Mean time from baseline 0.09 months (SD 0.28), T1Waitlist: 0.03 mo. (SD 0.20). T2Intervention: Mean timing 1.73 months (SD 0.87), T2Waitlist: 2.02 mo. (SD 1.04). T3Intervention: Mean timing 5.51 mo. (SD 0.57), T3Waitlist 3.41 mo. (SD 0.95)Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale Min Score: 0 Max Score: 60 Higher score correlates with worse outcome
ODSIST1Intervention: Mean time from baseline 0.09 months (SD 0.28), T1Waitlist: 0.03 mo. (SD 0.20). T2Intervention: Mean timing 1.73 months (SD 0.87), T2Waitlist: 2.02 mo. (SD 1.04). T3Intervention: Mean timing 5.51 mo. (SD 0.57), T3Waitlist 3.41 mo. (SD 0.95)Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale Min Score: 0 Max Score: 20 Higher score correlates with worse outcome
OASIST1Intervention: Mean time from baseline 0.09 months (SD 0.28), T1Waitlist: 0.03 mo. (SD 0.20). T2Intervention: Mean timing 1.73 months (SD 0.87), T2Waitlist: 2.02 mo. (SD 1.04). T3Intervention: Mean timing 5.51 mo. (SD 0.57), T3Waitlist 3.41 mo. (SD 0.95)Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale Min Score: 0 Max Score: 20 Higher score correlates with worse outcome

Countries

Vietnam

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORFrankie Wong

Florida State University

Participant flow

Recruitment details

194 people assessed for eligibility. 20 did not meet inclusion criteria for attendance. 7 could not be reached despite repeated contact attempts. 167 people were thus enrolled in the study.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous26.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
Education
Bachelor
87 Participants
Education
Don't Know
0 Participants
Education
Elementary
0 Participants
Education
High School
26 Participants
Education
Junior HS
1 Participants
Education
Masters/PhD
2 Participants
Education
No school
0 Participants
Education
Refused
1 Participants
Education
Vocational
6 Participants
Household Income
10-14.9M Vietnamese dong
20 Participants
Household Income
15-19.9M Vietnamese dong
5 Participants
Household Income
>20M Vietnamese dong
14 Participants
Household Income
5-9.9M Vietnamese dong
10 Participants
Household Income
<5M Vietnamese dong
1 Participants
Household Income
Don't Know
17 Participants
Household Income
Refused to Answer
19 Participants
Household Size2.9 people
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
Housing
Dorm
2 Participants
Housing
Family Home
23 Participants
Housing
Motel/Hotel
8 Participants
Housing
Non-Family Home
2 Participants
Housing
Other
1 Participants
Housing
Own
3 Participants
Housing
Refused to Answer
2 Participants
Housing
Rent
24 Participants
Housing
Street/Public
0 Participants
Marital Status
Declined to Answer
1 Participants
Marital Status
Married
2 Participants
Marital Status
Relationship
38 Participants
Marital Status
Single
103 Participants
Monthly Income
10-14.9M Vietnamese dong
18 Participants
Monthly Income
15-19.9M Vietnamese dong
1 Participants
Monthly Income
>20M Vietnamese dong
1 Participants
Monthly Income
5-9.9M Vietnamese dong
18 Participants
Monthly Income
<5M Vietnamese dong
24 Participants
Monthly Income
Don't Know
1 Participants
Monthly Income
Refused to Answer
4 Participants
Number of Children0.1 Number of children
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
Occupation
Refused to Answer
1 Participants
Occupation
School
9 Participants
Occupation
Unemployed
2 Participants
Occupation
Work
34 Participants
Occupation
Work and School
20 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Kinh (Viet)
71 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Other
6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Vietnam
77 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
77 Participants
Sexual Orientation
Bisexual
2 Participants
Sexual Orientation
Heterosexual
0 Participants
Sexual Orientation
Homosexual
75 Participants
Sexual Orientation
Other
7 Participants
Years of Residence10 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 830 / 84
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 830 / 84
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 830 / 84

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 7, 2026