Skip to content

A Study of Remote Electrical Neuromodulation for Acute Procedural Pain

Remote Electrical Neuromodulation for Acute Procedural Pain in Chronic Migraine Patients Receiving onabotulinumtoxinA

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05730556
Enrollment
80
Registered
2023-02-16
Start date
2023-02-13
Completion date
2024-09-09
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Migraine

Keywords

OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) injections

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of using remote electrical neuromodulation, using the Nerivio ® device, to relieve pain associated with receiving onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) injections for chronic migraine prevention.

Interventions

DEVICENerivio ®

Non-invasive wearable, remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) device controlled by a smartphone application worn on an armband on the upper arm.

DEVICESham

Electrical stimulation to mimic study treatment intervention

Sponsors

Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Meet the criteria for 1.3 chronic migraine based on ICHD3 criteria. * Currently receiving onabotulinumtoxinA per PREEMPT protocol for the treatment of chronic migraine. * Patient is willing and able to comply with the protocol to the satisfaction of the investigator. * Patient has the capacity to provide written, informed consent for themselves.

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with an active implanted electrical and/or neurostimulator device (e.g., cardiac pacemaker, cochlear implant). * Participants with congestive heart failure (CHF), severe cardiac or cerebrovascular disease. * Participants with uncontrolled epilepsy. * Pregnant, trying to get pregnant or breastfeeding female participants. * Subjects participating in any other interventional clinical study. * Participants with other significant pain, medical or psychological problems that in the opinion of the investigator may confound the study assessments. * Participants who have previous experience with the device. * Patients with cranial deformities, prior cranial surgeries with violation of the calvarium, or shunt placement. * Patients receiving concurrent nerve blocks or trigger point injections within the same visit

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline, Week 12, Week 24Measured by VAS values reported by participants using the 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS line will be 100 mm long with no intermediate delineations. Each end will be marked with no pain on the left, and worst possible pain on the right. Participants will identify their pain level by indicating a point on the line between each end. That point will be measured from the No pain end, and the number of millimeters will be reported as the pain score. Scores can range from 0 to 100, with higher score indicating worse pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Presence of Post-procedural HeadacheBaseline, Week 12, Week 24Number of subjects to report the presence of post-procedural headache, defined as a headache that lasts for 4 hours or more and is at least moderate in severity or during which abortive medications are used to treat the patient's head pain.
Adverse Events24 weeksNumber of adverse events reported

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

80 participants were consented to the study and of those 80 participants, 20 were withdrawn prior to randomization.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Electrical Neuromodulation, Then Sham
Subjects first had the Nerivio ® applied 20 minutes prior to clinical care onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) injection, and continued to wear the device for a total of 40 to 45 minutes at week 12. Subjects then had the sham device applied 20 minutes prior to clinical care onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) injection, and continued to wear the device for a total of 40 to 45 minutes at week 24. Nerivio ®: Non-invasive wearable, remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) device controlled by a smartphone application worn on an armband on the upper arm. Sham: Electrical stimulation to mimic study treatment intervention
30
Sham, Then Electrical Neuromodulation
Subjects first had the sham device applied 20 minutes prior to clinical care onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) injection, and continued to wear the device for a total of 40 to 45 minutes at week 12. Subjects then had the Nerivio ® applied 20 minutes prior to clinical care onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) injection, and continued to wear the device for a total of 40 to 45 minutes at week 24. Nerivio ®: Non-invasive wearable, remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) device controlled by a smartphone application worn on an armband on the upper arm. Sham: Electrical stimulation to mimic study treatment intervention
30
Total60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSham, Then Electrical NeuromodulationTotalElectrical Neuromodulation, Then Sham
Age, Continuous44.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
48.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
51.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
30 participants60 participants30 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants49 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants11 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 600 / 60
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 600 / 60
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 600 / 60

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Measured by VAS values reported by participants using the 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS line will be 100 mm long with no intermediate delineations. Each end will be marked with no pain on the left, and worst possible pain on the right. Participants will identify their pain level by indicating a point on the line between each end. That point will be measured from the No pain end, and the number of millimeters will be reported as the pain score. Scores can range from 0 to 100, with higher score indicating worse pain.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24

Population: Seven (7) participants in the Electrical Neuromodulation, Then Sham arm and Eight (8) participants in Sham, Then Electrical Neuromodulation arm did not have Week 24 data as the trial was stopped early as the stopping rule for efficiency was reached in the interim analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Electrical Neuromodulation, Then ShamChange in Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline Intra-Procedure52.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.6
Electrical Neuromodulation, Then ShamChange in Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 12 Post-Procedure38.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.7
Electrical Neuromodulation, Then ShamChange in Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 12 Pre-Procedure21.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.3
Electrical Neuromodulation, Then ShamChange in Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 24 Pre-Procedure19.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.7
Electrical Neuromodulation, Then ShamChange in Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline Post-Procedure59.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.1
Electrical Neuromodulation, Then ShamChange in Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 24 Intra-Procedure50.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.5
Electrical Neuromodulation, Then ShamChange in Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 12 Intra-Procedure37.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.3
Electrical Neuromodulation, Then ShamChange in Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 24 Post-Procedure54.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.4
Electrical Neuromodulation, Then ShamChange in Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline Pre-Procedure23.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.3
Sham, Then Electrical NeuromodulationChange in Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 24 Post-Procedure46.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.3
Sham, Then Electrical NeuromodulationChange in Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline Pre-Procedure32.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.8
Sham, Then Electrical NeuromodulationChange in Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline Intra-Procedure58.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.2
Sham, Then Electrical NeuromodulationChange in Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline Post-Procedure62.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.2
Sham, Then Electrical NeuromodulationChange in Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 12 Pre-Procedure27.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.7
Sham, Then Electrical NeuromodulationChange in Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 12 Intra-Procedure60.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.6
Sham, Then Electrical NeuromodulationChange in Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 12 Post-Procedure64.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.5
Sham, Then Electrical NeuromodulationChange in Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 24 Pre-Procedure25.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.3
Sham, Then Electrical NeuromodulationChange in Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 24 Intra-Procedure44.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.8
Secondary

Adverse Events

Number of adverse events reported

Time frame: 24 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Electrical Neuromodulation, Then ShamAdverse Events0 events
Sham, Then Electrical NeuromodulationAdverse Events0 events
Secondary

Presence of Post-procedural Headache

Number of subjects to report the presence of post-procedural headache, defined as a headache that lasts for 4 hours or more and is at least moderate in severity or during which abortive medications are used to treat the patient's head pain.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24

Population: Seven (7) participants in the Electrical Neuromodulation, Then Sham arm and Eight (8) participants in Sham, Then Electrical Neuromodulation arm did not have Week 24 data as the trial was stopped early as the stopping rule for efficiency was reached in the interim analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Electrical Neuromodulation, Then ShamPresence of Post-procedural HeadacheBaseline12 Participants
Electrical Neuromodulation, Then ShamPresence of Post-procedural HeadacheWeek 124 Participants
Electrical Neuromodulation, Then ShamPresence of Post-procedural HeadacheWeek 249 Participants
Sham, Then Electrical NeuromodulationPresence of Post-procedural HeadacheBaseline11 Participants
Sham, Then Electrical NeuromodulationPresence of Post-procedural HeadacheWeek 1220 Participants
Sham, Then Electrical NeuromodulationPresence of Post-procedural HeadacheWeek 244 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026