Skip to content

Ethnic Lip Augmentation With Hyaluronic Acid Filler

Ethnic Lip Augmentation With Hyaluronic Acid Filler: Utilization of a Validated Lip Fullness Scale and Determining Pre Injection Lips Size Preference and Post Injection Patient Satisfaction

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05730543
Enrollment
20
Registered
2023-02-16
Start date
2022-11-01
Completion date
2023-07-01
Last updated
2023-09-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lip Augmentation, Lip Fullness

Brief summary

Lip augmentation using hyaluronic acid filler in females with Fitzpatrick skin type V-VI

Detailed description

Using the revised Allergan Lip Fullness Scale (LFS) to improve post injection patient satisfaction in women with Fitzpatrick skin type (FPST) 5 and 6 (examples: Hispanic, African descendants, Indigenous Australians).

Interventions

DRUGVolbella or Juvederm Ultra XC filler

Hyaluronic acid filler

Sponsors

DeNova Research
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Females age 21 and above, with FPST 5 or 6, undergoing lip filler augmentation 2. Subjects will be required not to have had previous lip filler, fat injections, or other lip treatments in the last 12 months. 3. Subjects that understand the purpose and aspects of the study, freely sign the informed consent, complete the required treatment and follow up protocol.

Exclusion criteria

1. Females below the age of 21 2. Male patients 3. Subjects with LFS 5 4. Fitzpatrick skin Type 1-4 5. Subjects who have had previous lip filler, fat injections or other surgical lip augmentation in the last 12 months 6. Subjects who are pregnant or nursing 7. Subjects with a known allergy or sensitivity to any component of the study ingredients. 8. Subjects that do not understand the purpose and aspects of the study, do not sign the consent, and do not complete the required treatment and follow up visit will also be excluded. 9. Subjects with a history of bleeding disorders (Vitamin K deficiency, liver disease, renal disease, iatrogenic or otherwise). This includes persons who have undergone therapy with thrombolytics, anticoagulants, or inhibitors of platelet aggregation in the preceding 3 weeks (such as Coumadin, Plavix, heparin analogues) 10. Subjects should not be taking aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications, St. John's Wort, or high doses of Vitamin E supplements within 7 days prior to the start of the study 11. Subjects with active inflammation or infection in the area of treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lip size1 monthThe size of lip most desired based on the LFS scale. The possible choices are: 1) Minimal: flat or nearly flat contour, minimal red lip show. 2) Mild: some red lip show, no lower lip pout. 3) Moderate: Moderate red lip show with slight lower lip pout. 4) Marked: significant red lip show and lower lip pout, upper lip with moderate pout. 5) Very Marked: very significant red lip show, significant upper and lower lip pout.
Satisfaction level1 monthSatisfaction levels relative to baseline via the FACE-Q questionnaire. The questionnaire asks the following questions: 1) The shape of your lower lip? 2) How well your lips suit your face? 3) How nice your lips look when you smile. 4) How full your lower lip looks? 5) The style of your lips (e.g. pouty, natural)? 6) The shape of your upper lip? 7) How turned up your upper lip (cupids bow) looks? 8) The size of your lips? 9) How the outer corners of your lips look when your face is relaxed (still)? 10) How full your lips look? The possible choices for each question are as follows: very dissatisfied (1), somewhat dissatisfied (2), somewhat satisfied (3), very satisfied (4). Responses of very satisfied signify a more positive outcome. Overall scores closer to 40 signify a more favorable satisfaction level.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
LFS by age group1 monthLFS preference by age group (21-40 years old vs. 41+ years old). The size of lip most desired based on the LFS scale. The possible choices are: 1) Minimal: flat or nearly flat contour, minimal red lip show. 2) Mild: some red lip show, no lower lip pout. 3) Moderate: Moderate red lip show with slight lower lip pout. 4) Marked: significant red lip show and lower lip pout, upper lip with moderate pout. 5) Very Marked: very significant red lip show, significant upper and lower lip pout.
Improvement level1 monthSubjects will determine which LFS scale category they would like to be and then based upon final visit they will rate themselves again as to where they actually fall on the scale. Investigator will do the same but only at final visit.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026