Skip to content

Three-dimensional Virtual Imaging to Improve the Accuracy of Standard CT-based Nephrometric Scores: a Prospective Multicentric Observational Study

Three-dimensional Virtual Imaging to Improve the Accuracy of Standard CT-based Nephrometric Scores: a Prospective Multicentric Observational Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05729763
Enrollment
300
Registered
2023-02-15
Start date
2019-06-01
Completion date
2022-09-30
Last updated
2023-02-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Kidney Neoplasms

Keywords

minimally-invasive partial nephrectomy, nephrometry scores, 3D virtual imaging, HA3D, postoperative complications

Brief summary

STUDY DESIGN: prospective multicentric observational SAMPLE SIZE OF THE STUDY: The estimated number of patients to enroll in the multicenter study is at least 270 patients (statistically calculated referring to the results of a monocentric analysis including 101 patients with the same design, already performed by the Coordinator Center). NUMBER OF CENTERS INVOLVED: Considering a total number of patients enrolled of at least 270, number of Centers to be involved: 5. STUDY PROCEDURES: 3D virtual model rendering * CT-scan images sent in DICOM format to MEDICS (Turin, Italy) after anonymization. * Dedicated online platform available to upload the anonymized CT images, after registration. * CT imaging processing by bioengineers and 3DVM building within 72 hours * 3D-PDF download from the same online platform Nephrometric score assessment * All CT-scans and their 3DVMsevaluation in order to assess surgical complexity, as classified by the PADUA nephrometry score and its relative PADUA risk category. * For each Center: * assessment of the PADUA score on the basis of the CT-scans (2D-NS) by one urologist; * assessment of the PADUA score on the basis of the 3DVMs (3D-NS) by another urologist. Surgical intervention and pathological assessment * Dedicated expert surgeon for each Center performing NSS to all patients with the same surgical technique. * Dedicated uro-pathologist for each Center performing the histopathological evaluations of the specimens.

Interventions

OTHER3D-PADUA nephrometric score

Evaluation of the PADUA nephrometric score with 3D images

OTHER2D-PADUA nephrometric score

Evaluation of the PADUA nephrometric score with 2D images

Sponsors

San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* four-phase (unenhanced, corticomedullary, nephrographic and urographic phases) contrast enhanced CT-scan

Exclusion criteria

* evidence of anatomical abnormalities, like horse-shoe shaped or ectopic kidney. * preoperative imaging inadequate to perform a 3DVM (such as those with a CT-scan with \>3 mm acquisition interval of the slices, or suboptimal difference of enhancement among the enhanced phases) or older than 3 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PADUA nephrometry score calculated via 3D virtual modelling and standard bidimensional CT scan imagesBaselineThe PADUA nephrometry score predicts the risk of surgical and medical perioperative complications in patients who underwent partial nephrectomy. The PADUA nephrometry score evaluates different tumor characteristics: * Longitudinal (polar) location (Superior/inferior: 1pt; Middle: 2 pt), * Exophytic rate (\>=50%: 1pt; \<50%: 2pt; Endophytic: 3pt) * Renal rim (Lateral: 1pt; Medial: 2pt) * Renal sinus (Not involved: 1pt; Involved: 2pt) * Urinary collecting system (Not involved: 1pt; Dislocated/infiltrated: 2pt) * Tumor size (\<=4 cm: 1pt; 4.1-7 cm: 2pt; \>7: 3pt) The PADUA score, calculated as the sum of these parameters, stratify patients from PADUA 6 tumors, that have low risk of complications, to PADUA 14, with high risk of perioperative complications.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To compare the occurrence of postoperative complications, assessed by Clavien-Dindo classification90 days after surgeryThe Clavien-Dindo classification evaluates severity of complications in 5 groups: * Grade I: Any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic and radiological interventions; * Grade II: Requiring pharmacological treatment with drugs other than such allowed for grade I complications; * Grade III: Requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention (IIIa: Intervention not under general anesthesia; IIIb: Intervention under general anesthesia); * Grade IV Life-threatening complication requiring IC/ICU-management (IVa: single organ dysfunction; IVb: multiorgan dysfunction); * Grade V: Death of a patient.

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026