Skip to content

Efficacy of Music Listening to Shortening Time for Biophysical Profile

Efficacy of Music Listening to Shortening Time for Biophysical Profile

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05729750
Acronym
RRT
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-02-15
Start date
2022-02-01
Completion date
2022-12-26
Last updated
2023-02-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fetal Status, Nonreassuring

Keywords

Fetal biophysical profile, Music, Duration

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the timeing which assume for assesment of BPP in low risk pregnancy. The main question is the music can be shoetening the timing for BPP? Participants will in study froup will listening the music via headphone before and during the assessment and compre to control gruop which not listening to music during asseeement.

Detailed description

A single-blind randomized controlled trial conducted from February 2021 to December 2022. The study population consisted of 60 pregnant women with between 18 and 35 years old with gestational age of 32 weeks. An abdominal ultrasound was performed while listening to one song while wearing headphones in the experimental group preceding the biophysical profile assessment. As part of the control group, the same equipment was used and the same assessment protocol was followed, but music was not played during the test.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTTrans abdominal ultrasound for assess biophysical profile

The biophysical profile (BPP) was developed as a method of integrating real-time observation of the fetus in an intrauterine environment. Manning et al introduced the BPP test in 1980, and since then it has been widely used as a comprehensive assessment tool for both acute and chronic fetal health and fetal congenital malformations in the antepartum period which is a method that uses an overview of 5 key indicators, namely fetal tone, fetal breathing, fetal movement, deep ventricular pocket and NST, thus making it more accurate than either viewing.

Sponsors

Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Thailand
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

All participants whatever study or control gruops will get the headphone which may turn on the music in study gruop only that mean investigator will not known who are in listening to music.

Intervention model description

the participants were purpostive sampling, and devided into two groups. The study group listening to music before and suring the assessment while the control gruop will not listening to music.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Single pregnancy (Singleton) * Gestational age from 32 weeks onward * Pregnant women do not have underlying diseases such as pre-gestational diabetes. high blood pressure * No abnormalities in the fetus were found, such as fetal deformities.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant women receiving certain drugs or substances that affect the interpretation of the Biophysical Profile (BPP), e.g., sleeping pills, cigarettes. * Pregnant women have hearing problems. or hearing impaired * Pregnant women who are unable to wear headphones, e.g., otitis externa - Pregnant women with body mass index greater than 30 kg/m2 prior to pregnancy * Uterine contractions were observed during the examination

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total time used for the biophysical profileThrough study complete, an average 30 minutesTo compare the total time of biophysical profile assessment among pregnant women listening to music or not listening to music

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Satisfaction of musicAfter study complete, an average 30 minutesTo measure music listening satisfaction in experimental groups on a scale of 1 (unsatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied).

Countries

Thailand

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026