Skip to content

Outcomes of Perforation After Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Outcomes of Perforation After Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05728710
Enrollment
350
Registered
2023-02-15
Start date
2019-09-01
Completion date
2023-04-01
Last updated
2023-02-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Neoplasms, Perforation Colon, Perforation of Rectum

Keywords

endoscopic submucosal dissection, laterally spreading tumors, perforation

Brief summary

Endoscopic resection of superficial colorectal neoplasms decrease risk of colorectal cancer. En bloc resection is necessary for large superficial lesions with risk of superficial submucosal cancer and is advised if feasible for all lesions. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows en bloc resection of large superficial colorectal neoplasms, increasing curative resection rate and decreasing local recurrence risk. However, the risk of perprocedural or delayed perforation is higher compared to wild field piece meal endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscoping clipping and closing methods mostly allow conservative treatment, but some case still necessitate surgery. The aim of our study is to describe and ananalyse outcomes after perprocedural or delayed perforation in all patients undergoing ESD and analyse the need for surgical intervention.

Interventions

PROCEDUREEndoscopic submucosal dissection

standard ESD performed and complicated with a perprocedural or delayed perforation

Sponsors

Central Hospital, Nancy, France
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients from the FECCO (NCT04592003) cohort experiencing perprocedural or delayed perforation * age over 18 years old

Exclusion criteria

* patients refusing exploitations of health datas * patient treated with endoscopic mucosal resection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Surgery30 daysRate of surgery following perforation after ESD

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hospital readmission30 days
Curative resection rate60 days
Hospital stay60 dayslength of hospital stay (days)
Risk factors for endoscopic closure failure30 days
30-days mortality rate30 days
Endoscopically closed perforation rate30 days

Countries

Belgium, France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026