Skip to content

Music in Interventional Radiology Procedures

Music in Interventional Radiology Procedures: Effect on Patient and Staff Experience

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05728398
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-02-15
Start date
2023-04-01
Completion date
2024-01-31
Last updated
2023-02-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patient Satisfaction

Keywords

Interventional radiology, Music, procedure sedation, patient experience

Brief summary

The use of music as medical therapy for the treatment of mental health conditions like depression and anxiety is well established. Furthermore, music is sometimes played in operating rooms and several small single center studies done during cardiology and interventional radiology procedures have demonstrated that the use of music can decrease in the use of sedation medications, pain, and anxiety during the procedures. These past studies have only looked at the impact on the participants, as the music was delivered to the participants only through headphones. This means that the impact of music on the healthcare team was not studied. However, separate systematic literature reviews on the impact of playing music in operating rooms during surgical procedures have highlighted some positive effects music has on the surgeon and the surgical team. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of playing music during interventional radiology procedures on the participants and the healthcare team. One way of studying this is to compare the responses and experience of participants and healthcare team that hear ambient music during the procedure with those who did not.

Interventions

OTHERMusic

Music played within the fluoroscopy suite during an interventional radiology procedure.

OTHERNo Music

No music played within the fluoroscopy suite during an interventional radiology procedure.

Sponsors

Western University, Canada
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Undergoing an out-patient or non-emergent in-patient interventional radiology procedure

Exclusion criteria

* Participants unable to consent or complete survey information * Participants receiving procedures under general anesthesia * Participants unable to receive IV conscious sedation * Emergent cases or those performed outside of routine hospital hours

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedural Sedation requiredIntra-procedureDosage of Fentanyl and Midazolam required during interventional radiology procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participant intra-procedural anxietyIntra-procedureAssess peri-procedural anxiety using State-Trait Anxiety Inventory scale
Participant procedural painImmediately post-procedureParticipant qualitative assessment of procedural pain using Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Participant Procedural ExperienceImmediately post-procedureParticipant Experience qualitative assessment using Likert scale
Interventional radiology procedure lengthIntra-procedureMeasure the total time required to perform the IR procedure
Healthcare team experienceImmediately post-procedureAssess procedural healthcare team's (physician, IR nurse, & IR technologist) perceived impact of music on the procedure experience (Likert scale)

Contacts

Primary ContactDerek W Cool, MD, PhD
derek.cool@lhsc.on.ca5196858500

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026