Skip to content

Intravenous Tirofiban Versus Thrombolysis Before Mechanical Thrombectomy in Stroke

Intravenous Adjuvant With Tirofiban Versus Thrombolysis Before Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion: a Multicenter, Open Label, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05728333
Acronym
ADJUVANT
Enrollment
1014
Registered
2023-02-15
Start date
2023-11-28
Completion date
2026-05-25
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke, Acute Ischemic

Keywords

endovascular thrombectomy, large vessel occlusion, intravenous thrombolysis, tirofiban

Brief summary

In patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion, the role of intravenous adjunctive medications, such as tirofiban, or thrombolysis before endovascular thrombectomy has not been well investigated. This trial aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous tirofiban versus thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion piror to endovascular thrombectomy.

Detailed description

Intravenous thrombolysis bridging with endovascular treatment (EVT) has been proven to be effective therapy in acute ischemic stroke patients due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). Several randomized controlled trials, aiming to explore the benefits and risks of intravenous thrombolysis prior to EVT in LVO stroke, have suggested that intravenous thrombolysis should not be omitted. Although intravenous thrombolysis results in successful reperfusion in approximately 10% to 20% of LVO patients, obviating the need for EVT, it has limitations. First, the time window for intravenous thrombolysis is narrow with strict indications and contraindications. Second, it may increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Furthermore, thrombolysis is expensive. The above limitations lead to a very low proportion of patients who receive intravenous thrombolysis. Tirofiban is a selective IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor, and it's effective in preventing thrombosis complications. Intravenous tirofiban has been increasingly used as an adjunctive treatment in acute ischemic stroke patients receiving EVT. However, a direct comparison between tirofiban and thrombolysis in LVO stroke has not been performed. We therefore conduct a randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous tirofiban versus thrombolysis prior to EVT for acute ischemic stroke patients with LVO.

Interventions

DRUGTirofiban

Intravenous tirofiban before endovascular thrombectomy.

DRUGThrombolysis

Intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular thrombectomy.

Sponsors

Xinqiao Hospital of Chongqing
Lead SponsorOTHER
Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Westlake University School of Medicine
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Aged 18 years or older; 2. Acute ischemic stroke patient eligible for intravenous thrombolysis who are present within 4.5 hours of last known well, or present within 4.5-24 hours of last known well with demonstrated salvageable brain tissue (defined as an estimated ischemic core volume \<70 ml, a mismatch ratio ≥1.8 and a mismatch volume ≥15 ml); 3. Occlusion of the internal carotid artery, M1 or M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery, or basilar artery confirmed by CTA or MRA; 4. Endovascular thrombectomy is planned by clinical care team; 5. Informed written consent obtained from patients or their legal representatives.

Exclusion criteria

1. Acute intracranial hemorrhage on admission; 2. Contraindication to intravenous thrombolytics or tirofiban; 3. Pretreatment with intravenous thrombolysis after index stroke; 4. Significant pre-stroke disability defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score greater than 2; 5. Known pregnancy or lactation; 6. Allergy to radiographic contrast agents, nickel, titanium metals or their alloys; 7. Current participation in other drug clinical trials; 8. Arterial tortuosity and/or other arterial disease that would prevent the thrombectomy device from reaching the target vessel; 9. Patient with a preexisting neurological or psychiatric disease that would confound the outcome assessments; 10. Radiologically confirmed mass effect or intracranial tumor except for small meningioma; 11. Radiologically confirmed intracranial arteriovenous malformation or aneurysm. 12. Any terminal disease with a life expectancy less than half a year.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional independence90 days post-endovascular treatmentmodified Rankin scale score of 0 to 2. (The modified Rankin scale scores range from 0 to 6, with 0 indicating no disability, 1 no clinically significant disability, 2 slight disability, 3 moderate disability but able to walk unassisted, 4 moderately severe disability, 5 severe disability, and 6 death)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Modified Rankin scale score at 90 days90 days post-endovascular treatment
Excellent outcome90 days post-endovascular treatmentModified Rankin Scale score 0 to 1, or Modified Rankin scale score return to baseline
Successful reperfusion before thrombectomyPrior to thrombectomyThe expanded Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) reperfusion grading system is a 6-point scale: 0 indicates no reperfusion noted; 1, reduction in thrombus without filling of distal arterial branches; 2a, reperfusion of \<50% of the territory; 2b, a reperfusion of ≥50% of the territory; 2c, near-complete perfusion with distal slow flow or presence of small cortical emboli; and 3, complete reperfusion. Successful reperfusion at initial angiogram prior to thrombectomy was defined as an eTICI grade of 2b, 2c, or 3 on the first intracranial angiogram.
Successful reperfusion on the final angiogramEnd-of-procedure angiographyAchieve eTICI 2b, 2c or 3
First pass excellent reperfusionAfter the first thrombectomy passAchieve eTICI 2c or 3
First pass successful reperfusionAfter the first thrombectomy passAchieve eTICI 2b, 2c or 3
Time from puncture to reperfusion or procedure completionfrom puncture to reperfusion or procedure completion
Use of balloon angioplasty or stenting during procedureDuring endovascular treatment
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at 5 to 7 days or discharge if earlierAt 5 to 7 days post-endovascular treatment or discharge if earlierScores on National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) range from 0 to 42, with less scores indicating less severe neurologic deficits.
EQ-5D-5L scale score at 90 days90 days post-endovascular treatmentScores on the European Quality Five-Dimension Five-Level Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) range from -0.39 to 1, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life; 0 is the value of a health state equivalent to death.

Countries

China

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORCongguo Yin, Doctor

Hangzhou First Hospital of Westlake University

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORZhongming Qiu, Doctor

The 903rd Hospital of PLA, China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 15, 2026