Skip to content

Smartphone-based Aftercare for Inpatients With Bulimia Nervosa

Efficacy of a Therapist-guided Smartphone-based Intervention to Support Recovery From Bulimia Nervosa: a Randomized Controlled Multi-center Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05728021
Acronym
SMART-BN
Enrollment
172
Registered
2023-02-14
Start date
2020-09-01
Completion date
2024-08-31
Last updated
2023-02-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bulimia Nervosa

Keywords

Bulimia nervosa, Smartphone, Aftercare, Inpatient

Brief summary

Inpatient treatment for patients with bulimia nervosa (BN) is recommended in extreme or severe cases and/or after failure of outpatient treatment and is highly effective. However, a number of patients show symptom increase and relapse after discharge. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a guided smartphone-based aftercare intervention following inpatient treatment of patients with BN to support recovery.

Detailed description

Bulimia nervosa (BN) is a severe mental disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of binge eating and recurrent inappropriate compensatory behaviors to prevent weight gain. Evidence-based psychological treatments exist, however, even if treatment is successful in reducing behaviors such as binge eating and purging, abstinence rates may remain low and even if remission or abstinence have been received after treatment relapse rates are substantial. There is evidence that the stability of remission increases if the corresponding symptom improvement lasts at least for 4 months. Studies on the effectiveness of inpatient treatment in adult patients with BN show responder rates of up to 77%. However, it is often difficult for patients to maintain therapy success after discharge, as relapse rates reach up to 40% with the highest risk during the first 5 or 6 months after remission. There is preliminary evidence for efficacy regarding the potential of technology-based interventions in aftercare for patients with BN. However, so far, there is no study evaluating a smartphone-based aftercare intervention for patients with BN. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of a guided smartphone-based aftercare intervention as an add-on element to treatment as usual (TAU) compared to TAU alone in inpatients with BN. Our primary hypothesis is that the intervention group shows a significantly higher remission rate than TAU at end of treatment. Eligible patients with BN who are discharged from inpatient treatment will be randomized either to receive a 4-month smartphone-based aftercare intervention with therapist feedback as an add-on element to treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. Assessment points will be as follows: at hospital discharge (=baseline, T0), 16 weeks (=end of the aftercare intervention, T1) and after 10 months (=6-month follow-up, T2).

Interventions

Patients randomized to IG receive a therapist-guided smartphone-based aftercare intervention for a period of 16 weeks. The patients are invited to download for free the German version of Recovery Record at the App Store (iPhone) or the Google Play Store (android) to their smartphone and to link with the aftercare therapist. After discharge, patients are asked to monitor their meals at least three times per day (breakfast, lunch, and dinner), that is, to produce a minimum of three logs per day over the subsequent 16 weeks. Furthermore, patients are instructed to monitor their thoughts and feelings as well as their (eating disordered) behaviors. The aftercare therapist also sets the patients clinical post-discharge goals and makes coping skill suggestions. Individual therapist feedback is provided in-app twice per week during the first four weeks, once per week in weeks 5-8 and every other week in weeks 9-16.

BEHAVIORALTreatment as usual (TAU)

Patients randomized to CG receive TAU i.e. patients and their physicians or therapists decide on post-discharge treatment which is documented at T1 and T2. Patients from the CG are also assessed at all assessment points.

Sponsors

Schoen Clinic Roseneck
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Schoen Clinic Bad Bramstedt
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Schoen Clinic Bad Arolsen
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Klinik Lüneburger Heide
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Else Kröner Fresenius Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
13 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. primary diagnosis of BN (DSM-5: 307.51) at admission as assessed by the diagnostically relevant items from the Eating Disorder Examination (Hilbert et al. 2016b), 2. sex: female, 3. age: from 13 years onwards to 60 years, 4. regular completion of inpatient treatment, 5. at least a length of inpatient stay of 6 weeks, 6. remission defined as less than once a week of binge eating and compensatory behavior in the past 28 days thus no longer meeting the full criteria for BN according to DSM-5, 7. owner of a smartphone, 8. informed consent of the patient and, in case of minors, also of the parents.

Exclusion criteria

1. major depression (Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) \> 29 at discharge), 2. suicidal tendency (item 9 of BDI-II \> 1 at discharge), 3. very high level of care after inpatient treatment (e.g. therapeutic living community, day clinic), 4. pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Eating Disorder Severity (assessor-based)Measured at baseline (discharge), at week 16 (end of treatment) and 6 month follow-upThe Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) will be used to measure assessor-based eating disorder symptom severity over time. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 6. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Body-Mass-Index (BMI)Measured at baseline, week 16 and 6 month follow-upWeight and height will be used to measure BMI over time.
Changes in depressive symptomsMeasured at baseline, week 16 and 6 month follow-upThe Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) will be used to measure depressive symptoms. Minimal value: 0, maximum value: 63. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Changes in stages of change regarding specific eating disorder behaviorsMeasured at baseline, week 16 and 6 month follow-upThe Stages of Change Questionnaire for Eating Disorders (SOCQ-ED) will be used to measure changes in stages of change (precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, maintenance, termination) specific eating disorder behaviors over time.
Changes in general self-efficacyMeasured at baseline, week 16 and 6 month follow-upThe General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) will be used to measure self-efficacy over time. Minimum value: 10, maximum value: 40. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Changes in eating disorder specific self-efficacyMeasured at baseline, week 16 and 6 month follow-upA self-efficacy scale will be used to measure self-efficacy regarding patients' confidence about resisting binge eating over time. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 3. Higher scores mean better outcomes.
Changes in Eating Disorder Severity (self-report)Measured at baseline, week 4, week 16 and 6 month follow-upThe Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) will be used to measure self-reported eating disorder symptom severity over time. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 6. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Ratings of suitability of treatment and expectancy of treatment outcomeMeasured at week 4Ten-point visual analogue scales will assess patients' perceptions of the suitability of the aftercare intervention and their expectations that they would maintain their remission status. Higher scores mean a better suitability and expectancy.
Participant satisfaction with the app and the aftercare interventionMeasured at week 16A self-developed questionnaire will be used to assess self-reported satisfaction with the app and the aftercare intervention. Minimum value: 1, maximum value: 5. Higher scores mean a better satisfaction.
Additional outpatient and inpatient treatment after dischargeMeasured at week 16 and 6 month follow-upNumber and length of outpatient or inpatient treatment (rehospitalization) since discharge will be assessed.
Adherence to the smartphone-based aftercare interventionMeasured from baseline to week 16Adherence will be measured via dichotomous outcome of drop-out (individuals will be considered as drop-out if they fail to login to the app at all for a period of 14 consecutive days. Adherence will be assessed through application usage data.
Adherence to self-monitoring tasksMeasured from baseline to week 16Frequency of self-monitoring entries will be tracked automatically through the program server
Therapeutic AllianceMeasured at week 4 and week 16The Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAQ) will be used to measure therapeutic alliance. Minimum value: 11, maximum value: 66. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactSandra Schlegl, PhD
sandra.schlegl@med.uni-muenchen.de+4989440053369
Backup ContactUlrich Voderholzer, MD
uvoderholzer@schoen-klinik.de+49805168100102

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026