Skip to content

Plan My Life Together; a Group Training for Adolescents With ADHD

A Group Training to Plan and Organize for Adolescents With ADHD: Effectiveness and Feasibility

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05726812
Enrollment
30
Registered
2023-02-14
Start date
2023-03-01
Completion date
2024-07-15
Last updated
2024-07-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ADHD, Adolescence

Keywords

Planning and organization skills, Plan My Life, Group Training

Brief summary

This observational study is a first orientation on the effects and feasibility of a group training to plan and organize for adolescents with attention deficit disorder (ADHD). This study focuses on the following questions: * Is there an improvement on planning skills after training? * Are there fewer ADHD characteristics after training? * Is there an improvement on self-esteem after training? * How feasible is a group training for adolescents with ADHD? * How satisfied are practitioners and adolescents about the training? Based on the effect-size of the individual training variant, the literature on the effect of group treatment and the adolescent target group, in which the peer group gets more important, the hypothesis is that the group training Plan My Life Together will have a medium to large effect on planning skills. Furthermore, positive effects on ADHD characteristics and self-esteem are also expected. The assumption is that Plan My Life Together is feasible and suitable.

Detailed description

Attention deficit and/or hyperactivity and impulsivity disorder (ADHD) has a high prevalence in the adolescence. In this age stage, where independence and personal responsibility become increasingly important, ADHD is characterized mainly by problems in executive functions and there are often problems in planning schoolwork.This is frequently accompanied by tensions in the family. More co-morbidity also develops, including problems in self-image, as a result of negative feedback from the environment. Individual behavioral treatment has been found to be effective in reducing ADHD symptoms. In the ADHD guidelines (cognitive) behavioral therapy aimed at planning and organization, with consideration for motivational interviewing elements, is recommended for adolescents. In the individual training Plan My Life, adolescents learn to plan their school and homework better through cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and motivational interviewing, so that they have fewer problems with their ADHD characteristics and have more positive experiences. The training is proven effective, few adolescents drop out, and parents and practitioners are positive about the training. The training was developed and studied on an individual basis. There may be advantages to offering this training in a group setting. Among other things, the group can serve as a catalyst and experiences can be shared. Group therapy has been shown to work for several mental disorders, in some cases even better than the individual therapy. It is obvious that in adolescence the group is relatively even more important. Also, group treatment can be more efficient.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPlan My Life Together

A group training for adolescents with ADHD in which they learn to plan and organize. The training consists of 8 weekly sessions of 90 minutes for the adolescent and 2 parent sessions of 90 minutes.

Sponsors

Universiteit Leiden
CollaboratorOTHER
GGZ Noord-Holland-Noord
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adolescents with an ADHD classification according to the DSM-5. * age 12 to 16 years. * outpatient treatment at GGZ-NHN (specialized mental health care service in the Netherlands)) or at Psychologenpraktijk Kuin (first-line psychological mental health care, Haarlem) * currently following secondary regular education * Intention to participate in the group and willingness to fill out questionnaires several times.

Exclusion criteria

* a DSM-5 classification of autism * acute crisis situation (acute suicidality, acute psychotic symptoms, addiction problems requiring immediate treatment, or unsafe home situation) * Insufficient mastery of the Dutch language.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the subscale scores plan/organize - self rated (from BRIEF-2, see description))Baseline (start study) - T0 (=9 weeks after start study, intervention starts) - T1 (=18 weeks after start study) - T2 (=27 weeks after start study)Subscale plan/organize from the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adolescent version Higher scores indicated better planning/organizing scales. Subscale ranges from 8 - 24
Change in the subscale score plan/organize - parent rated (from BRIEF-2, see description)Baseline (start study) - T0 (=9 weeks after start study, intervention starts) - T1 (=18 weeks after start study) - T2 (=27 weeks after start study)Subscale plan/organize from the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Parent version Higher scores indicated better planning/organizing scales. Subscale ranges from 8 - 24

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in AVL - parent rated (see description)Baseline (start study) - T0 (=9 weeks after start study, intervention starts) - T1 (=18 weeks after start study) - T2 (=27 weeks after start study)ADHD Vragenlijst - ouders (ADHD rating scale, Dutch version) Higher scores indicate more ADHD-symptoms. Range: 0 - 72
Change in RSES - self rated (see description)Baseline (start study) - T0 (=9 weeks after start study, intervention starts) - T1 (=18 weeks after start study) - T2 (=27 weeks after start study)Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale - Adolescent version Higher scores indicate more self-esteem. Range: 0-40
Change in RSES - parent rated (see description)Baseline (start study) - T0 (=9 weeks after start study, intervention starts) - T1 (=18 weeks after start study) - T2 (=27 weeks after start study)Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale - Parent version Higher scores indicate more self-esteem. Range: 0-40

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Scale questions on satisfactionOnly at T2 (=27 weeks after start study)Scale questions for practitioners and adolescents to measure satisfaction with the group training Higher scores indicate more satisfaction. Range: 1-10.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026