Skip to content

Comparison of the Effect of Two Types of Physical Exercises in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Comparison of the Effect of Two Types of Physical Exercise on the Improvement of Exercise Capacity, Diastolic Function, Endothelial Function, and Arterial Stiffness in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (ExIC-FEp Study)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05726474
Acronym
ExIC-FEp
Enrollment
72
Registered
2023-02-14
Start date
2023-01-23
Completion date
2025-05-15
Last updated
2025-06-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arterial Stiffness, Diastolic Function, Endothelial Function, Exercise Capacity, Heart Failure, Physical Exercise

Brief summary

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a chronic disease with a very important and increasingly severe social and health impact with a prevalence of 6.8% in Spain. HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represents approximately 50% of all patients with HF. In the absence of pharmacological treatments that have succeeded in reducing mortality or morbidity in this pathology, it is recommended that interventions be directed at prevention, symptomatic treatment of HF and treatment of comorbidities to avoid exacerbations, thus physical exercise is recognized as an important adjunct in the treatment of HF and is recommended by the guidelines of the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Currently, aerobic exercise is the most studied physical exercise in this population, but in recent years high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and the combination of aerobic exercise with strength training (combined exercise) have emerged. Objectives: The overall objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of combined training and HIIT on exercise capacity, diastolic function, endothelial function, and arterial stiffness in patients with HFpEF. The specific objectives of this study are: a) to compare the effectiveness of combined training and HIIT on quality of life in patients with HFpEF and b) to analyze the cost-effectiveness of combined training and HIIT versus conventional treatment in patients with HFpEF. Methodology: The ExIC-FEp study will be a single-blind randomized clinical trial with 3 arms (combined exercise, HIIT and a control group), conducted at the Health and Social Research Center of the University of Castilla-La Mancha, to analyze two types of supervised physical exercise in patients with HFpEF for 6 months. Patients with HFpEF will be randomly assigned (1:1:1) to the combined exercise, HIIT or control group. All participants will be examined, at baseline (prior to randomization), at three months (mid-intervention) and at six months (at the end of the intervention). Participants will undergo physical examination, echocardiography, maximal cardiopulmonary stress test, and measurement of endothelial function and arterial stiffness. In addition, sociodemographic variables, quality of life, physical activity, adherence to the Mediterranean diet, strength, spirometry and blood sampling will be measured. Expected scientific contributions: this randomized clinical trial will represent a a significant advance in the scientific evidence available on the efficacy of physical exercise in the treatment of HFpEF, through: (a) transfer of the results to physicians, nurses and patients; (b) dissemination of results through scientific articles, doctoral theses and participation in congresses; (c) press releases and press conferences with the aim of disseminating the research results to the population; (d) dissemination through social networks to improve the social impact; and (e) design and content development of a web page.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCombined exercise

Patients will exercise for 40 minutes three times a week on an ergometric bicycle at 50-60% of VO2max, 60-70% of HRmax, 11-13 on the Borg scale, without ergometer at 50-60% of VO2max, 60-70% of HRmax, 11-13 on the Borg scale, without shortness of breathing difficulty. In addition, strength training will be performed (bench press, leg press, leg curl, leg machine, bench press, leg press, leg curl, leg curl, leg machine). leg curls, leg curls, rowing machine, triceps dips, pectoral pull-ups) twice a week. week. Strength training will be performed with 15 repetitions per exercise and per session, with a corresponding workload of 15 repetitions. session, with a workload corresponding to 60% to 65% of the 1-repetition maximum (1RM) measured at (1RM) measured at the beginning and at the end of the intervention.

BEHAVIORALHigh interval training

Patients will perform three training sessions per week. Each training session begins with a 10-minute warm-up at moderate intensity (corresponding to 50-60% of VO2max, 60-70% of HRmax, 11-13 on the Borg scale, no shortness of breath) before cycling, four 4-minute intervals at high intensity (corresponding to 85-90% of VO2max, 90-95% of HRmax, 15-17 on the Borg scale, shortness of breath). Each interval will be separated by 3 minutes of active pauses, with a HRmax of 50-70%. The training session will end with 3 minutes of cool down at moderate intensity (corresponding to 50-60%). moderate intensity (corresponding to 50-60% of VO2max, 60-70% of HRmax, 11-13 on the Borg scale, without difficulty). Borg scale, no shortness of breath). The total exercise time will be 40 minutes for the HIIT group.

Sponsors

University of Castilla-La Mancha
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Heart Failure with preserved ejection fraction picture (diagnosis according to ESC 2021 criteria) 1. Signs and symptoms of Heart Failure 2. A left ventricular ejection fraction of ≥50%. 3. Objective evidence of cardiac structural and/or functional abnormalities consistent with the presence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction/elevated left ventricular filling pressures, including elevated natriuretic peptides. 2. Sedentary men and women (structured exercise \<2 x 30 min/week). 3. Age ≥40 years 4. Written informed consent 5. Clinically stable for 6 weeks 6. Optimal medical treatment for ≥6 weeks

Exclusion criteria

1. Non-cardiac causes of heart failure symptoms: * Significant valvular or coronary artery disease - Uncontrolled hypertension or arrhythmias. * Primary cardiomyopathies 2. Significant pulmonary disease (FEV1\<50% predicted, GOLD III-IV) 3. Inability to exercise or conditions that may interfere with exercise intervention. 4. Myocardial infarction in the last 3 months 5. Signs of ischaemia during maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test. 6. Comorbidity that may influence one-year prognosis 7. Participation in another clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
E velocityChange from Baseline E velocity at 3 monthsE velocity in m/s
Exercise capacityChange from Baseline exercise capacity at 3 monthsMaximal cardiopulmonary stress test with Ergoline600 ergometer bicycle.
Endothelial functionChange from Baseline endothelial function at 3 monthsCarotid intima-media thickness: by ultrasound with the Sonosite SII device.
Arterial stiffnessChange from Baseline arterial stiffness at 3 monthsPulse wave velocity and augmentation index
A velocityChange from Baseline A velocity at 3 monthsA velocity in m/s
E/A ratioChange from Baseline E/A ratio at 3 monthsE/A ratio
e' velocityChange from Baseline e' velocity in m/s at 3 monthse' velocity in m/s
E/e' ratioChange from Baseline E/e' ratio at 3 monthsE/e' ratio
ejection fractionChange from Baseline ejection fraction at 3 monthspercentage of ejection fraction
left ventricular volume indexChange from Baseline left ventricular volume index at 3 monthsleft ventricular volume index
end-diastolic volumeChange from Baseline end-diastolic volume at 3 monthsend-diastolic volume
left ventricular massChange from Baseline left ventricular mass at 3 monthsleft ventricular mass
left atrial diameterChange from Baseline left atrial diameter at 3 monthsleft atrial diameter
isovolume relaxation timeChange from Baseline isovolume relaxation time at 3 monthsisovolume relaxation time in seg
deceleration timeChange from Baseline deceleration time at 3 monthsdeceleration time in m/s
left atrial volume indexChange from Baseline left atrial volume index at 3 monthsleft atrial volume index

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
heightChange from Baseline height at 3 monthsheight in centimeters
HDL-cholesterolChange from Baseline HDL-cholesterol at 6 monthsHDL-cholesterol
LDL-cholesterolChange from Baseline LDL-cholesterol at 6 monthsLDL-cholesterol
apolipoproteins A1 and BChange from Baseline apolipoproteins A1 and B at 6 monthsapolipoproteins A1 and B
insulinChange from Baseline insulin at 6 monthsinsulin
ultra-sensitive C-reactive proteinChange from Baseline ultra-sensitive C-reactive protein at 6 monthsultra-sensitive C-reactive protein
N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)Change from Baseline N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) at 6 monthsN-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)
HbA1cChange from Baseline HbA1c at 6 monthsHbA1c
waist circumferenceChange from Baseline waist circumference at 3 monthswaist circumference in cm
body fatChange from Baseline body fat at 3 monthspercentage of body fat
blood pressureChange from Baseline blood pressure at 3 monthssystolic and diastolic blood pressure in mmHg
total cholesterolChange from Baseline total cholesterol at 6 monthstotal cholesterol
triglyceridesChange from Baseline triglycerides at 6 monthstriglycerides
BMIChange from Baseline BMI at 3 monthsBMI in kg/m2
Sociodemographic variablesBaselineAge, sex and socioeconomic level
Patient's medical historyBaselineComorbidities and medication
WeightChange from Baseline weight at 3 monthsWeight in kilogram
Muscular strengthChange from Baseline Muscular strength at 3 monthsHandgrip force to be determined with TKK 5401 Grip-D dynamometer.
SpirometryChange from Baseline spirometry at 3 monthsForced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and FEV1/FVC ratio.
GlucoseChange from Baseline Glucose at 3 monthsGlucose
Physical activityChange from Baseline phisical activity at 3 monthsAccelerometry. Time of physical activity
HQoLChange from Baseline HQoL at 3 monthsValidated 12-item health questionnaire (SF-12). From 0 to 12 (higher values better HQoL)
Adherence to the Mediterranean dietChange from Baseline Adherence to the Mediterranean diet at 3 monthsValidated 14-item questionnaire on adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MEDAS-14). From 0 to 14 (higher values better Adherence)

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026