Skip to content

Prediction of Clinical Outcome in Axillary Block

Perfusion Index Value in Predicting the Clinical Outcome of Axillary Block

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05723419
Enrollment
70
Registered
2023-02-10
Start date
2023-02-13
Completion date
2023-11-30
Last updated
2023-02-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Chronic

Brief summary

The primary endpoint of this study was to identify that Perfusion index (PI) has any predictive value for the treatment outcome of cervical radiculopathy

Detailed description

The interscalene brachial plexus block is an effective intervention for reducing postoperative pain but is related to side effects, Suprascapular nerve block and a block of the axillary nerve have been introduced as alternatives to the interscalene brachial plexus for the control of postoperative pain. Previous study demonstrated new method of axillary block using interfascial plane injection guided by ultrasoud. Axillary block has been used widely for the relief of postoperative arm pain. Recent study deomonstrated good pain relief when ultrasound guided fascial plane injection was performed in patients with cervical radiuculopathy. The perfusion index (PI) is a numerical value for the ratio between pulsatile and non-pulsatile blood flow measured by a special pulse oximeter. Although the special probe for PI measurement is relatively more expensive compared with ordinary pulse oximetery probes, its benefit as a marker of peripheral perfusion and as an idex for sympathetic stimulation have increased its use progressively. PI has been used widely for the prediction of success of brachial plexus block or axillary block. Changes of PI ratio value showed an excellent predictive value for the success of block. There have been no studies demonstrating any predictive value of PI in axillary block for the relief of cervical radiulopathy

Interventions

PROCEDUREaxillary block using 5 ml local anesthetics

ultrasoud guided axillary block

Sponsors

Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

* Cervical foraminal stenosis * Cervical central stenosis * Cervical disc herniation * Cervical spondylolisthesis

Exclusion criteria

* Infection * pregnancy * allergy to local anesthetic agents * previous cervical spine surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perfusion index changes among 4 time periodsbaseline, 10 minutes, 20 minutes, 30 minutes after axillary blockPerfusion index changes among 4 time periods
Number of patients showing numerical rating scale reduction more than 50%1 month after axillary blockNumber of patients showing numerical rating scale reduction more than 50%
Number of patients showing numerical rating scale reduction less than 50%1 month after axillary blockNumber of patients showing numerical rating scale reduction less than 50%
Number of patients showing no reduction in numerical rating scale1 month after axillary blockNumber of patients showing no reduction in numerical rating scale
Neck disability index changes between 2 time periodsbaseline, 1 month after axillary blockNeck disability index changes between 2 time periods

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactJi H Hong
swon13@daum.net01046794343
Backup ContactJi Hoon Park
cmjihoon@gmail.com+82532587760

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026