Skip to content

Comparison of the Effects of External Focus and Internal Focus Instructions Applied Chronic Low Back Pain: RCT

Comparison of the Effects of External Focus and Internal Focus Instructions Applied in Balance Training on Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05722457
Enrollment
44
Registered
2023-02-10
Start date
2023-03-05
Completion date
2023-07-20
Last updated
2023-11-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Physical Therapy Techniques

Keywords

Physical Therapy, low back pain,, external focus

Brief summary

Postural control methods are impaired in people with chronic low back pain. While the person maintains balance with pain relief, fear of movement and pain increase with loss of balance. It was found that externally focused exercises are more effective than internal focus exercises in terms of motor control and motor learning. To investigate the place of externally focused balance exercises in conservative treatment of target low back pain. For this purpose, approval was obtained from the clinical research ethics committee of Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Faculty of Medicine, with the decision numbered 2022-18/163.

Detailed description

Focusing on the inside of the body while performing a movement is called internal (internal focus), focusing on the outside of the body is called external (external focus). Many previous studies have shown that external focus is substantially more effective than internal focus in the performance of a movement.In our randomized controlled study, there were two groups and 22 people were treated in each group. Volunteers between the ages of 18-65 who had low back pain for the last 3 months and had no musculoskeletal problems were included. Balances were evaluated with Biodex Balance Device, pain with Visual Analog Scale, performance with Physical Performance Test Battery, functional level with osvewstry disability index, posture, spinal mobility,postural endurance with spinal mouse device. 8 weeks of treatment were applied to both groups as external focus and control groups. Basically similar exercises were applied to both groups, and there were tasks in the exercises in the external focus group, and the focus were on the task other than the exercise. The results of the study show that externally focused balance exercises are effective on dynamic balance, fall risk, stability limits, physical performance, posture, spinal mobility, and postural endurance in individuals with CLBP.

Interventions

OTHERexternal focus task focus in addition to physiotherapy and rehabilitation exercises

The first study on the external focus was made in 1998 by Wulf, Ho ¨ß, & Prinz, (1998). Focusing on the inside of the body while performing a movement is called internal (internal focus), focusing on the outside of the body is called external (external focus). Previous studies have shown that external focus is substantially more effective than internal focus in the performance of a movement.

OTHERinternal focus task focus in addition to physiotherapy and rehabilitation exercises

he first study on the external focus was made in 1998 by Wulf, Ho ¨ß, & Prinz, (1998). Focusing on the inside of the body while performing a movement is called internal (internal focus), focusing on the outside of the body is called external (external focus). Previous studies have shown that external focus is substantially more effective than internal focus in the performance of a movement.

Sponsors

Kirsehir Ahi Evran Universitesi
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

the participant and evaluator do not know who the groups are

Intervention model description

2 groups will be formed using the random randomization model

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Those with ongoing low back pain symptoms in the last three months (diagnosed with chronic low back pain), * Individuals between the ages of 18-65 * Pain level 3 or more according to VAS * Individuals who volunteer to participate in the study will be included.

Exclusion criteria

* Individuals with lower extremity and spine orthopedic and neurological disorders, * Having a musculoskeletal injury in the last 9 months, * Surgery, injection, etc. for low back pain in the last 3 months. with a history of treatment * Those who are doing any sports activity, * Subjects who do not cooperate well will not be included in the study. Inclusion and

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain level Individuals are asked to indicate the degree of pain they have on the VAS scale numbered from 0 to 10 on a straight line, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the most severe pain.8 weeksThe units included in the study are the use of VAS (Visual Analog Scale) for the presence and burden of low back pain. At the beginning and end of each start-up, the presence and effect of pain is asked and taken away. The reason for preferring these variables VAS is that they have high validity and reliability. Individuals are asked to indicate the degree of pain they have on the VAS scale numbered from 0 to 10 on a straight line, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the most severe pain.
Evaluation of Functional Status (Oswestry Disability Index) Physical functions .The result is calculated with the formula patient's score / probable maximum score X 100. Each question has an answer rating from 0 to 5.8 weeksOswestry Disability Scale Evaluation of Physical Function Evaluation of Functional Status (Oswestry Disability Index) Physical functions will be evaluated with the Oswestry low back pain scale. It is a very common scale compiled to evaluate the general condition of the low back in patients with low back pain. Scoring of the answered questions is carried out by adding the numbers next to the checked box. Each question has an answer rating from 0 to 5. The maximum score can be 50 if the individual has answered each question. The result is calculated with the formula patient's score / probable maximum score X 100
The Physical Performance Level8 weeksThe physical performance test battery includes the following tests: lumbar flexion range of motion, walking fifty steps, walking for 5 minutes, sitting and standing with 5 repetitions, trunk flexion with 10 repetitions, and reaching forward with weight.
Balance8 weeksThe Biodex stability system (Biodex Medical System Inc., NY, USA, Model SW4530DE6N, SD 950304) was used to assess static and dynamic balance, fall risk, and the limit of stability
Assessment of Posture, Spinal Mobility, and Postural Endurance Spinal Mobilite8 weeksSpinal posture, spinal mobility, and postural competence were measured with a computer-assisted wireless Spinal Mouse device (the Spinal Mouse System, Idiag, Fehraltorf, Switzerland). By moving the Spinal Mouse device on the spine with its wheel, it measures the length of the spine, posture, and joint movements and transfers this sequence to the computer environment. Trunk flexion posture was recorded for spinal mobility. Upright posture was measured for the postural endurance (competence) values, and then, after holding a weight of 5% of the person's body weight between the hands parallel to the shoulder level for 30 seconds, the upright posture was re-measured while the weight was still in the person's hand.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026