Skip to content

Ethical Deliberation in the Intensive Care Unit, Impact of Formalized Multidisciplinary Team Meetings, a Pilot Study

Ethical Deliberation in the Intensive Care Unit, Impact of Formalized Multidisciplinary Team Meetings, a Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05722431
Enrollment
450
Registered
2023-02-10
Start date
2023-02-15
Completion date
2024-10-31
Last updated
2026-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ethics, Narrative

Keywords

End of life decisions in the ICU, Multidisciplinary team meetings, Ethical decision making climate, Nurses job satisfaction

Brief summary

Most patients who die in the intensive care unit do so after a withholding or withdrawing of life sustaining treatments (WWLST) decision. The implementation of formalized interdisciplinary team meetings for ethical deliberation in the ICU may improve nurses participation in WWLST decisions. The investigators decided to implement such team meetings in their ICU. At this occasion, the investigators will measure job satisfaction, job related frustration and ethical decision making climate climate.

Detailed description

Most patients who die in the intensive care unit do so after a withholding or withdrawing of life sustaining treatments (WWLST) decision. Because those decisions are value-laden, guidelines as well as french regulations recommend that they should involve not only medical doctors but also nurses. Despite that, nurses' involvement remains incomplete. Poor collaboration between doctors and nurses on ethical decisions is associated with job dissatisfaction, burnout and desire to quit. The implementation of formalized interdisciplinary team meetings for ethical deliberation in the ICU may improve nurses participation in WWLST decisions. For those reasons the investigators decided to implement such team meetings in their ICU. At this occasion, the investigators will measure job satisfaction, job related frustration and ethical decision making climate climate.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University Hospital, Tours
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients admitted in the ICU

Exclusion criteria

* Age below 18

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in nurses perception of ethical decision making climate in the ICUjune 2023, january 2024Nurses answers to the questionnaire "Ethical Decision-Making Climate Questionnaire (7 factors evaluated, for each factor score ranges from 1 to 5, higher scores indicate a better climate)".

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in nurses psychological well being at work2 evaluations: may 2023, january 2024Nurses answers to the Index of psychological well being at work (5 factors, for each factor score ranges from 1 to 5, higher scores indicate more well being).
Change in nurses frustration of job's related psychological needs2 evaluations: may 2023, january 2024Nurses answers to the Job related psychological needs frustration score (3 factors, for each factor score ranges from 1 to 5, higher score indicate more frustration)
Change in nurses desire to leave2 evaluations: may 2023, january 2024Nurses answers to a one question questionnaire: "I have thoughts about leaving my current position/job" (lickert scale, score range from 1 to 5, higher score indicate a higher desire to leave)
Non beneficial careJanuary 2024Duration of mechanical ventilation in patients who ultimately die (number of days)

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORROMAIN MIGUEL MONTANES, MD

University Hospital of TOURS

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORServane Barrault, PhD

University of Tours

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 2, 2026